Show simple item record

Prevalence and appropriateness of indwelling urinary catheters in Japanese hospital wards: a multicenter point prevalence study

dc.contributor.authorKatayama, Kohta
dc.contributor.authorMeddings, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSaint, Sanjay
dc.contributor.authorFowler, Karen E.
dc.contributor.authorRatz, David
dc.contributor.authorTagashira, Yasuaki
dc.contributor.authorKawamura, Yumi
dc.contributor.authorFujikawa, Tatsuya
dc.contributor.authorNishiguchi, Sho
dc.contributor.authorKayauchi, Naomi
dc.contributor.authorTakagaki, Nobumasa
dc.contributor.authorTokuda, Yasuharu
dc.contributor.authorKuriyama, Akira
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:01:28Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:01:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-21
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infectious Diseases. 2022 Feb 21;22(1):175
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07162-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173458en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Indwelling urinary catheters are commonly used in hospitalized patients, which can lead to the development of urinary catheter complications, including catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Limited reports on the appropriateness of urinary catheter use exist in Japan. This study investigated the prevalence and appropriateness of indwelling urinary catheters, and the incidence of CAUTI in non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) wards in Japanese hospitals. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted in 7 non-ICU wards from 6 hospitals in Japan from October 2017 to June 2018. At each hospital the study teams evaluated urinary catheter prevalence through in-person bedside evaluation for at least 5 days of each week for 3 months. Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) incidence and appropriateness of catheter use was collected via chart review. Results We assessed 710 catheter-days over 5528 patient-days. The mean prevalence of indwelling urinary catheter use in participating wards was 13% (range: 5% to 19%), while the mean incidence of CAUTI was 9.86 per 1000 catheter-days (range: 0 to 33.90). Approximately 66% of the urinary catheter days assessed had an appropriate indication for use (range: 17% to 81%). A physician's order for catheter placement was present in only 10% of catheterized patients. Conclusion This multicenter study provides epidemiological information about the appropriate use of urinary catheters in Japanese non-ICU wards. A multimodal intervention may help improve the appropriate use of urinary catheters.
dc.titlePrevalence and appropriateness of indwelling urinary catheters in Japanese hospital wards: a multicenter point prevalence study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173458/1/12879_2022_Article_7162.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5189
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:01:27Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.