Show simple item record

A comparison of tobacco product prevalence by different frequency of use thresholds across three US surveys

dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Romero, Luz M.
dc.contributor.authorCadham, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorHirschtick, Jana L.
dc.contributor.authorMattingly, Delvon T.
dc.contributor.authorCho, Beomyoung
dc.contributor.authorFleischer, Nancy L.
dc.contributor.authorBrouwer, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorMistry, Ritesh
dc.contributor.authorLand, Stephanie R.
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Jihyoun
dc.contributor.authorMeza, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorLevy, David T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:05:00Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:05:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-24
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):1203
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11283-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173497en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background With the increasing changes in tobacco use patterns, “current use” definition and the survey used may have important implications for monitoring population use trends. Methods Using three US surveys (2014/15 TUS-CPS, NHIS and PATH), we compared the adult (age 18+) prevalence of four product groups (cigarettes, other combustibles, smokeless tobacco, and e-cigarettes) based on three past 30-day frequency of use thresholds: 1+, 10+, and 25+ days. We also examined mutually exclusive single, dual, and polytobacco users as a percentage of total users for each product group. Results Regardless of threshold or product, the prevalence was higher in PATH followed by NHIS and TUS-CPS, in some cases by large percentages. The differences in cigarette and smokeless tobacco use prevalence in going from the 1+ to 10+ days and to the 25+ days threshold were minimal. Applying different frequency thresholds had the largest impact on other combustibles prevalence, with a 60% reduction with the 10+ days threshold and a 80% reduction with the 25+ days threshold, compared to the 1+ days threshold, followed by e-cigarettes with 40 and 60% reductions, respectively. The proportion of dual and polytobacco users decreased considerably when using the 10+ vs. the 1+ days threshold and polytobacco use was almost non-existent with the 25+ days threshold. Conclusion The estimated prevalence of each tobacco product use depends largely on the survey and frequency of use threshold adopted. The choice of survey and frequency threshold merits serious consideration when monitoring patterns of tobacco use.
dc.titleA comparison of tobacco product prevalence by different frequency of use thresholds across three US surveys
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173497/1/12889_2021_Article_11283.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5228
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:05:00Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.