Show simple item record

Association between temperature exposure and cognition: a cross-sectional analysis of 20,687 aging adults in the United States

dc.contributor.authorKhan, Anam M.
dc.contributor.authorFinlay, Jessica M.
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Philippa
dc.contributor.authorSol, Ketlyne
dc.contributor.authorMelendez, Robert
dc.contributor.authorJudd, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorGronlund, Carina J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:05:20Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:05:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-29
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;21(1):1484
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11533-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173501en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Older adults are particularly vulnerable to the adverse health effects of extreme temperature-related events. A growing body of literature highlights the importance of the natural environment, including air pollution and sunlight, on cognitive health. However, the relationship between exposure to outdoor temperatures and cognitive functioning, and whether there exists any differences across climate region, remains largely unexplored. We address this gap by examining the temperature-cognition association, and whether there exists any variation across climate regions in a national cohort of aging adults. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we obtained data on temperature exposure based on geocoded residential location of participants in the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. For each participant, this information was linked to their cognitive scores from Word List Learning and Recall tests to assess cognitive functioning. We used distributed lag non-linear models (dlnm) to model temperature effects over 2 days. Multivariable linear regression was used to compute temperature-cognitive functioning associations, adjusted for important covariates. Region-specific (“Dry”, “Mediterranean/oceanic”, “Tropical” and “Continental”) associations were examined by including an interaction term between climate region and temperature. Results Amongst 20,687 individuals (mean age = 67.8; standard deviation = 9.2), exposure to region-specific extreme cold temperatures in the “dry” region (e.g., Arizona) over 2 days was associated with lower cognitive scores (Mean Difference [MD]: -0.76, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: − 1.45, − 0.07). Associations remained significant for cumulative effects of temperature over 2 days. Extremely cold exposure in the “Mediterranean/oceanic” region (e.g., California) over 2 days was also associated with significantly lower cognitive performance (MD: -0.25, 95% CI: − 0.47, − 0.04). No significant associations were observed for exposure to hot temperatures. Cognitive performance was slightly higher in late summer and fall compared to early summer. Conclusion We noted adverse cognitive associations with cold temperatures in traditionally warmer regions of the country and improved cognition in summer and early fall seasons. While we did not observe very large significant associations, this study deepens understanding of the impact of climate change on the cognitive health of aging adults and can inform clinical care and public health preparedness plans.
dc.titleAssociation between temperature exposure and cognition: a cross-sectional analysis of 20,687 aging adults in the United States
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173501/1/12889_2021_Article_11533.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5232
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:05:19Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.