Show simple item record

Study protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial testing virtual tobacco treatment in oncology practices [Smokefree Support Study 2.0]

dc.contributor.authorGoshe, Brett M.
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Autumn W.
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Lynne I.
dc.contributor.authorSicks, JoRean D.
dc.contributor.authorGareen, Ilana F.
dc.contributor.authorCarlos, Ruth C.
dc.contributor.authorHerman, Benjamin A.
dc.contributor.authorWalter, Angela W.
dc.contributor.authorRegan, Susan
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Douglas E.
dc.contributor.authorMahon, Irene
dc.contributor.authorMuzikansky, Alona
dc.contributor.authorNeil, Jordan M.
dc.contributor.authorLui, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorDilip, Deepika
dc.contributor.authorMalloy, Laura
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Irina
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein-Fox, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorMcCann, Caitlin
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Elissa
dc.contributor.authorOstroff, Jamie S.
dc.contributor.authorPark, Elyse R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:06:36Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:06:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-15
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):1359
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13631-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173518en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Persistent smoking among patients diagnosed with cancer is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, yet an evidence-based tobacco use intervention has not been well-integrated into cancer care in community oncology settings. This paper describes the protocol of a nation-wide clinical trial conducted by the ECOG-ACRIN National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base to assess the effectiveness of a virtual tobacco treatment intervention and the process of implementing tobacco treatment in NCORP community oncology settings. Methods/design This two-arm, multisite (n: 49 NCORP sites) hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial compares the effectiveness of a Virtual Intervention Treatment (VIT) versus an Enhanced Usual Control (EUC) among English and Spanish speaking patients recently diagnosed with cancer, reporting current smoking and receiving care at a participating NCORP Community or Minority/Underserved Site. The VIT includes up to 11 virtual counseling sessions with a tobacco treatment specialist and up to 12 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). The EUC arm receives a referral to the NCI Quitline. The primary study outcome is biochemically confirmed 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence. Moderators of treatment effect will be assessed. The study evaluates implementation processes from participating NCORP site staff via survey, administrative, and focus group data, including reach, acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, feasibility, adoption, cost and sustainability outcomes. Discussion This trial will generate findings about the effectiveness of an evidence-based virtual tobacco treatment intervention targeting patients diagnosed with cancer and illuminate barriers and facilitators that influence implementing tobacco treatment into community oncology settings nationally. In the era of COVID-19, virtual care solutions are vital for maximizing access and utilization of tobacco treatment delivery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03808818) on January 18th, 2019; Last update posted: May 21st, 2020.
dc.titleStudy protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial testing virtual tobacco treatment in oncology practices [Smokefree Support Study 2.0]
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173518/1/12889_2022_Article_13631.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5249
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:06:35Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.