Show simple item record

Infection-related hospitalization following ureteroscopic stone treatment: results from a surgical collaborative

dc.contributor.authorCole, Adam
dc.contributor.authorTelang, Jaya
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae-Kyung
dc.contributor.authorSwarna, Kavya
dc.contributor.authorQi, Ji
dc.contributor.authorDauw, Casey
dc.contributor.authorSeifman, Brian
dc.contributor.authorAbdelhady, Mazen
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, William
dc.contributor.authorHollingsworth, John
dc.contributor.authorGhani, Khurshid R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:07:36Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-03
dc.identifier.citationBMC Urology. 2020 Nov 03;20(1):176
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00720-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173530en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Unplanned hospitalization following ureteroscopy (URS) for urinary stone disease is associated with patient morbidity and increased healthcare costs. To this effect, AUA guidelines recommend at least a urinalysis in patients prior to URS. We examined risk factors for infection-related hospitalization following URS for urinary stones in a surgical collaborative. Methods Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (ROCKS) is a quality improvement (QI) initiative from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) consisting of academic and community practices in the State of Michigan. Trained abstractors prospectively record standardized data elements from the health record in a web-based registry including patient characteristics, surgical details and complications. Using the ROCKS registry, we identified all patients undergoing primary URS for urinary stones between June 2016 and October 2017, and determined the proportion hospitalized within 30 days with an infection-related complication. These patients underwent chart review to obtain clinical data related to the hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for hospitalization. Results 1817 URS procedures from 11 practices were analyzed. 43 (2.4%) patients were hospitalized with an infection-related complication, and the mortality rate was 0.2%. Median time to admission and length of stay was 4 and 3 days, respectively. Nine (20.9%) patients did not have a pre-procedure urinalysis or urine culture, which was not different in the non-hospitalized cohort (20.5%). In hospitalized patients, pathogens included gram-negative (61.5%), gram-positive (19.2%), yeast (15.4%), and mixed (3.8%) organisms. Significant factors associated with infection-related hospitalization included higher Charlson comorbidity index, history of recurrent UTI, stone size, intra-operative complication, and procedures where fragments were left in-situ. Conclusions One in 40 patients are hospitalized with an infection-related complication following URS. Awareness of risk factors may allow for individualized counselling and management to reduce these events. Approximately 20% of patients did not have a pre-operative urine analysis or culture, and these findings demonstrate the need for further study to improve urine testing and compliance
dc.titleInfection-related hospitalization following ureteroscopic stone treatment: results from a surgical collaborative
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173530/1/12894_2020_Article_720.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5261
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:07:36Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.