Show simple item record

Public health utility of cause of death data: applying empirical algorithms to improve data quality

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Sarah C.
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorDippenaar, Ilse N.
dc.contributor.authorSharara, Fablina
dc.contributor.authorWool, Eve E.
dc.contributor.authorAgesa, Kareha M.
dc.contributor.authorHan, Chieh
dc.contributor.authorMiller-Petrie, Molly K.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Shadrach
dc.contributor.authorFuller, John E.
dc.contributor.authorBalassyano, Shelly
dc.contributor.authorBertolacci, Gregory J.
dc.contributor.authorDavis Weaver, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Alan D.
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Christopher J. L.
dc.contributor.authorNaghavi, Mohsen
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:14:50Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:14:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-02
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2021 Jun 02;21(1):175
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01501-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173605en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Accurate, comprehensive, cause-specific mortality estimates are crucial for informing public health decision making worldwide. Incorrectly or vaguely assigned deaths, defined as garbage-coded deaths, mask the true cause distribution. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study has developed methods to create comparable, timely, cause-specific mortality estimates; an impactful data processing method is the reallocation of garbage-coded deaths to a plausible underlying cause of death. We identify the pattern of garbage-coded deaths in the world and present the methods used to determine their redistribution to generate more plausible cause of death assignments. Methods We describe the methods developed for the GBD 2019 study and subsequent iterations to redistribute garbage-coded deaths in vital registration data to plausible underlying causes. These methods include analysis of multiple cause data, negative correlation, impairment, and proportional redistribution. We classify garbage codes into classes according to the level of specificity of the reported cause of death (CoD) and capture trends in the global pattern of proportion of garbage-coded deaths, disaggregated by these classes, and the relationship between this proportion and the Socio-Demographic Index. We examine the relative importance of the top four garbage codes by age and sex and demonstrate the impact of redistribution on the annual GBD CoD rankings. Results The proportion of least-specific (class 1 and 2) garbage-coded deaths ranged from 3.7% of all vital registration deaths to 67.3% in 2015, and the age-standardized proportion had an overall negative association with the Socio-Demographic Index. When broken down by age and sex, the category for unspecified lower respiratory infections was responsible for nearly 30% of garbage-coded deaths in those under 1 year of age for both sexes, representing the largest proportion of garbage codes for that age group. We show how the cause distribution by number of deaths changes before and after redistribution for four countries: Brazil, the United States, Japan, and France, highlighting the necessity of accounting for garbage-coded deaths in the GBD. Conclusions We provide a detailed description of redistribution methods developed for CoD data in the GBD; these methods represent an overall improvement in empiricism compared to past reliance on a priori knowledge.
dc.titlePublic health utility of cause of death data: applying empirical algorithms to improve data quality
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173605/1/12911_2021_Article_1501.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5336
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:14:48Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.