Show simple item record

A better understanding of the association between maternal perception of foetal movements and late stillbirth—findings from an individual participant data meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorThompson, John M. D.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorBradford, Billie F.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Minglan
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Robin S.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Adrienne
dc.contributor.authorRaynes-Greenow, Camille H.
dc.contributor.authorStacey, Tomasina
dc.contributor.authorCullling, Vicki M.
dc.contributor.authorAskie, Lisa M.
dc.contributor.authorO’Brien, Louise M.
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Edwin A.
dc.contributor.authorMcCowan, Lesley M. E.
dc.contributor.authorHeazell, Alexander E. P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:20:31Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:20:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-15
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medicine. 2021 Nov 15;19(1):267
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02140-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173674en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Late stillbirth continues to affect 3–4/1000 pregnancies in high-resource settings, with even higher rates in low-resource settings. Reduced foetal movements are frequently reported by women prior to foetal death, but there remains a poor understanding of the reasons and how to deal with this symptom clinically, particularly during the preterm phase of gestation. We aimed to determine which women are at the greatest odds of stillbirth in relation to the maternal report of foetal movements in late pregnancy (≥ 28 weeks’ gestation). Methods This is an individual participant data meta-analysis of all identified case-control studies of late stillbirth. Studies included in the IPD were two from New Zealand, one from Australia, one from the UK and an internet-based study based out of the USA. There were a total of 851 late stillbirths, and 2257 controls with ongoing pregnancies. Results Increasing strength of foetal movements was the most commonly reported (> 60%) pattern by women in late pregnancy, which were associated with a decreased odds of late stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.20, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.27). Compared to no change in strength or frequency women reporting decreased frequency of movements in the last 2 weeks had increased odds of late stillbirth (aOR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.73 to 3.14). Interaction analysis showed increased strength of movements had a greater protective effect and decreased frequency of movements greater odds of late stillbirth at preterm gestations (28–36 weeks’ gestation). Foetal hiccups (aOR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.58) and regular episodes of vigorous movement (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.87) were associated with decreased odds of late stillbirth. A single episode of unusually vigorous movement was associated with increased odds (aOR = 2.86, 95% CI 2.01 to 4.07), which was higher in women at term. Conclusions Reduced foetal movements are associated with late stillbirth, with the association strongest at preterm gestations. Foetal hiccups and multiple episodes of vigorous movements are reassuring at all gestations after 28 weeks’ gestation, whereas a single episode of vigorous movement is associated with stillbirth at term.
dc.titleA better understanding of the association between maternal perception of foetal movements and late stillbirth—findings from an individual participant data meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173674/1/12916_2021_Article_2140.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5405
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:20:30Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.