Show simple item record

Amniotic fluid cell-free transcriptome: a glimpse into fetal development and placental cellular dynamics during normal pregnancy

dc.contributor.authorTarca, Adi L.
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorPique-Regi, Roger
dc.contributor.authorPacora, Percy
dc.contributor.authorDone, Bogdan
dc.contributor.authorKacerovsky, Marian
dc.contributor.authorBhatti, Gaurav
dc.contributor.authorJaiman, Sunil
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Sonia S.
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Chaur-Dong
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Lopez, Nardhy
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:20:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:20:48Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-12
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Genomics. 2020 Feb 12;13(1):25
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-020-0690-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173677en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The amniotic fluid (AF) cell-free transcriptome is modulated by physiologic and pathologic processes during pregnancy. AF gene expression changes with advancing gestation reflect fetal development and organ maturation; yet, defining normal expression and splicing patterns for biomarker discovery in obstetrics requires larger heterogeneous cohorts, evaluation of potential confounding factors, and novel analytical approaches. Methods Women with a normal pregnancy who had an AF sample collected during midtrimester (n = 30) or at term gestation (n = 68) were included. Expression profiling at exon level resolution was performed using Human Transcriptome Arrays. Differential expression was based on moderated t-test adjusted p < 0.05 and fold change > 1.25; for differential splicing, a splicing index > 2 and adjusted p < 0.05 were required. Functional profiling was used to interpret differentially expressed or spliced genes. The expression of tissue-specific and cell-type specific signatures defined by single-cell genomics was quantified and correlated with covariates. In-silico validation studies were performed using publicly available datasets. Results 1) 64,071 genes were detected in AF, with 11% of the coding and 6% of the non-coding genes being differentially expressed between midtrimester and term gestation. Expression changes were highly correlated with those previously reported (R > 0.79, p < 0.001) and featured increased expression of genes specific to the trachea, salivary glands, and lung and decreased expression of genes specific to the cardiac myocytes, uterus, and fetal liver, among others. 2) Single-cell RNA-seq signatures of the cytotrophoblast, Hofbauer cells, erythrocytes, monocytes, T and B cells, among others, showed complex patterns of modulation with gestation (adjusted p < 0.05). 3) In 17% of the genes detected, we found differential splicing with advancing gestation in genes related to brain development processes and immunity pathways, including some that were missed based on differential expression analysis alone. Conclusions This represents the largest AF transcriptomics study in normal pregnancy, reporting for the first time that single-cell genomic signatures can be tracked in the AF and display complex patterns of expression during gestation. We also demonstrate a role for alternative splicing in tissue-identity acquisition, organ development, and immune processes. The results herein may have implications for the development of fetal testing to assess placental function and fetal organ maturity.
dc.titleAmniotic fluid cell-free transcriptome: a glimpse into fetal development and placental cellular dynamics during normal pregnancy
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173677/1/12920_2020_Article_690.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5408
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:20:46Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.