Impact of gastroesophageal reflux on longitudinal lung function and quantitative computed tomography in the COPDGene cohort
dc.contributor.author | Baldomero, Arianne K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wendt, Chris H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Petersen, Ashley | |
dc.contributor.author | Gaeckle, Nathaniel T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Han, MeiLan K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kunisaki, Ken M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-10T18:24:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-10T18:24:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-08-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Respiratory Research. 2020 Aug 03;21(1):203 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01469-y | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173724 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Rationale Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and has been associated with increased risk of acute exacerbations, hospitalization, emergency room visits, costs, and quality-of-life impairment. However, it remains unclear whether GERD contributes to the progression of COPD as measured by lung function or computed tomography. Objective To determine the impact of GERD on longitudinal changes in lung function and radiographic lung disease in the COPDGene cohort. Methods We evaluated 5728 participants in the COPDGene cohort who completed Phase I (baseline) and Phase II (5-year follow-up) visits. GERD status was based on participant-reported physician diagnoses. We evaluated associations between GERD and annualized changes in lung function [forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)] and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) metrics of airway disease and emphysema using multivariable regression models. These associations were further evaluated in the setting of GERD treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and/or histamine-receptor 2 blockers (H2 blockers). Results GERD was reported by 2101 (36.7%) participants at either Phase I and/or Phase II. GERD was not associated with significant differences in slopes of FEV1 (difference of − 2.53 mL/year; 95% confidence interval (CI), − 5.43 to 0.37) or FVC (difference of − 3.05 mL/year; 95% CI, − 7.29 to 1.19), but the odds of rapid FEV1 decline of ≥40 mL/year was higher in those with GERD (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.20; 95%CI, 1.07 to 1.35). Participants with GERD had increased progression of QCT-measured air trapping (0.159%/year; 95% CI, 0.054 to 0.264), but not other QCT metrics such as airway wall area/thickness or emphysema. Among those with GERD, use of PPI and/or H2 blockers was associated with faster decline in FEV1 (difference of − 6.61 mL/year; 95% CI, − 11.9 to − 1.36) and FVC (difference of − 9.26 mL/year; 95% CI, − 17.2 to − 1.28). Conclusions GERD was associated with faster COPD disease progression as measured by rapid FEV1 decline and QCT-measured air trapping, but not by slopes of lung function. The magnitude of the differences was clinically small, but given the high prevalence of GERD, further investigation is warranted to understand the potential disease-modifying role of GERD in COPD pathogenesis and progression. Clinical trials registration NCT00608764 . | |
dc.title | Impact of gastroesophageal reflux on longitudinal lung function and quantitative computed tomography in the COPDGene cohort | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173724/1/12931_2020_Article_1469.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5455 | |
dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-08-10T18:24:55Z | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.