Show simple item record

Six-month outcomes of the HOPE smartphone application designed to support treatment with medications for opioid use disorder and piloted during an early statewide COVID-19 lockdown

dc.contributor.authorHodges, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorWaselewski, Marika
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, William
dc.contributor.authorFranklin, Taylor
dc.contributor.authorSchorling, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorHuynh, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorTabackman, Alexa
dc.contributor.authorOtero, Kori
dc.contributor.authorIngersoll, Karen
dc.contributor.authorTiouririne, Nassima A.
dc.contributor.authorFlickinger, Tabor
dc.contributor.authorDillingham, Rebecca
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:45:34Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:45:34Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-07
dc.identifier.citationAddiction Science & Clinical Practice. 2022 Mar 07;17(1):16
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-022-00296-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173961en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Morbidity and mortality related to opioid use disorder (OUD) in the U.S. is at an all-time high. Innovative approaches are needed to address gaps in retention in treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Mobile health (mHealth) approaches have shown improvement in engagement in care and associated clinical outcomes for a variety of chronic diseases, but mHealth tools designed specifically to support patients treated with MOUD are limited. Methods Following user-centered development and testing phases, a multi-feature smartphone application called HOPE (Heal. Overcome. Persist. Endure) was piloted in a small cohort of patients receiving MOUD and at high risk of disengagement in care at an office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) clinic in Central Virginia. Outcomes were tracked over a six-month period following patient enrollment. They included retention in care at the OBOT clinic, usage of various features of the application, and self-rated measures of mental health, substance use, treatment and recovery. Results Of the 25 participants in the HOPE pilot study, a majority were retained in care at 6 months (56%). Uptake of bi-directional features including messaging with providers and daily check-ins of mood, stress and medication adherence peaked at one month, and usage persisted through the sixth month. Patients who reported that distance to clinic was a problem at baseline had higher loss to follow up compared to those without distance as a reported barrier (67% vs 23%, p = 0.03). Patients lost to in-person clinic follow up continued to engage with one or more app features, indicating that mHealth approaches may bridge barriers to clinic visit attendance. Participants surveyed at baseline and 6 months (N = 16) scored higher on scales related to overall self-control and self-efficacy related to drug abstinence. Conclusions A pilot study of a novel multi-feature smartphone application to support OUD treatment showed acceptable retention in care and patient usage at 6 months. Further study within a larger population is needed to characterize ‘real world’ uptake and association with outcomes related to retention in care, relapse prevention, and opioid-associated mortality.
dc.titleSix-month outcomes of the HOPE smartphone application designed to support treatment with medications for opioid use disorder and piloted during an early statewide COVID-19 lockdown
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173961/1/13722_2022_Article_296.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5692
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:45:34Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.