Show simple item record

Keyword expansion techniques for mining social movement data on social media

dc.contributor.authorBozarth, Lia
dc.contributor.authorBudak, Ceren
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:45:42Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:45:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-21
dc.identifier.citationEPJ Data Science. 2022 May 21;11(1):30
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00343-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173962en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Political and social scientists have been relying extensively on keywords such as hashtags to mine social movement data from social media sites, particularly Twitter. Yet, prior work demonstrates that unrepresentative keyword sets can lead to flawed research conclusions. Numerous keyword expansion methods have been proposed to increase the comprehensiveness of keywords, but systematic evaluations of these methods have been lacking. Our paper fills this gap. We evaluate five diverse keyword expansion techniques (or pipelines) on five representative social movements across two distinct activity levels. Our results guide researchers who aim to use social media keyword searches to mine data. For instance, we show that word embedding-based methods significantly outperform other even more complex and newer approaches when movements are in normal activity periods. These methods are also less computationally intensive. More importantly, we also observe that no single pipeline can identify little more than half of all movement-related tweets when these movements are at their peak mobilization period offline. However, coverage can increase significantly when more than one pipeline is used. This is true even when the pipelines are selected at random.
dc.titleKeyword expansion techniques for mining social movement data on social media
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173962/1/13688_2022_Article_343.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5693
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:45:41Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.