Show simple item record

Whole lung tissue is the preferred sampling method for amplicon-based characterization of murine lung microbiota

dc.contributor.authorBaker, Jennifer M.
dc.contributor.authorHinkle, Kevin J.
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Roderick A.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.authorFalkowski, Nicole R.
dc.contributor.authorHuffnagle, Gary B.
dc.contributor.authorDickson, Robert P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:47:21Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:47:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-05
dc.identifier.citationMicrobiome. 2021 May 05;9(1):99
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01055-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173981en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Low-biomass microbiome studies (such as those of the lungs, placenta, and skin) are vulnerable to contamination and sequencing stochasticity, which obscure legitimate microbial signal. While human lung microbiome studies have rigorously identified sampling strategies that reliably capture microbial signal from these low-biomass microbial communities, the optimal sampling strategy for characterizing murine lung microbiota has not been empirically determined. Performing accurate, reliable characterization of murine lung microbiota and distinguishing true microbial signal from noise in these samples will be critical for further mechanistic microbiome studies in mice. Results Using an analytic approach grounded in microbial ecology, we compared bacterial DNA from the lungs of healthy adult mice collected via two common sampling approaches: homogenized whole lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. We quantified bacterial DNA using droplet digital PCR, characterized bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and systematically assessed the quantity and identity of bacterial DNA in both specimen types. We compared bacteria detected in lung specimens to each other and to potential source communities: negative (background) control specimens and paired oral samples. By all measures, whole lung tissue in mice contained greater bacterial signal and less evidence of contamination than did BAL fluid. Relative to BAL fluid, whole lung tissue exhibited a greater quantity of bacterial DNA, distinct community composition, decreased sample-to-sample variation, and greater biological plausibility when compared to potential source communities. In contrast, bacteria detected in BAL fluid were minimally different from those of procedural, reagent, and sequencing controls. Conclusions An ecology-based analytical approach discriminates signal from noise in this low-biomass microbiome study and identifies whole lung tissue as the preferred specimen type for murine lung microbiome studies. Sequencing, analysis, and reporting of potential source communities, including negative control specimens and contiguous biological sites, are crucial for biological interpretation of low-biomass microbiome studies, independent of specimen type. Video abstract
dc.titleWhole lung tissue is the preferred sampling method for amplicon-based characterization of murine lung microbiota
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173981/1/40168_2021_Article_1055.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5712
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:47:20Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.