Show simple item record

Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cardio-oncology: results from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network survey

dc.contributor.authorSadler, Diego
dc.contributor.authorDeCara, Jeanne M.
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Joerg
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Anita
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Arjun K.
dc.contributor.authorAbdel-Qadir, Husam
dc.contributor.authorYang, Eric H.
dc.contributor.authorSzmit, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorAkhter, Nausheen
dc.contributor.authorLeja, Monika
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Carolina M. P. D. C.
dc.contributor.authorRaikhelkar, Jayant
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Sherry-Ann
dc.contributor.authorDent, Susan
dc.contributor.authorO’Quinn, Rupal
dc.contributor.authorThuny, Franck
dc.contributor.authorMoudgil, Rohit
dc.contributor.authorRaez, Luis E.
dc.contributor.authorOkwuosa, Tochukwu
dc.contributor.authorDaniele, Andres
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Brenton
dc.contributor.authorKondapalli, Lavanya
dc.contributor.authorIsmail-Khan, Roohi
dc.contributor.authorLax, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorBlaes, Anne
dc.contributor.authorNahleh, Zeina
dc.contributor.authorElson, Leah
dc.contributor.authorBaldassarre, Lauren A.
dc.contributor.authorZaha, Vlad
dc.contributor.authorRao, Vijay
dc.contributor.authorLara, Daniel S.
dc.contributor.authorSkurka, Kerry
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:52:30Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-27
dc.identifier.citationCardio-Oncology. 2020 Nov 27;6(1):28
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-020-00085-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/174037en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated. Objectives To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers’ opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners. Methods An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty. Results One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) (p = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies. Conclusions These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.
dc.titlePerspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cardio-oncology: results from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network survey
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/174037/1/40959_2020_Article_85.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5768
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:52:30Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.