Predicting Direct-Specimen SARS-CoV-2 Assay Performance Using Residual Patient Samples
dc.contributor.author | Schroeder, LF | |
dc.contributor.author | Bachman, MA | |
dc.contributor.author | Idoni, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Gegenheimer-Holmes, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Kronick, SL | |
dc.contributor.author | Valdez, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Lephart, PR | |
dc.coverage.spatial | England | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-02T15:57:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-02T15:57:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-04 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2576-9456 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2475-7241 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34755849 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/174159 | en |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Diagnostic sensitivities of point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 assays depend on specimen type and population-specific viral loads. Evaluation of these assays require "direct" specimens from paired-swab studies rather than more accessible residual specimens in viral transport media (VTM). METHODS: Residual VTM and limit-of-detection studies were conducted on Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19, Quidel Sofia 2™ SARS Antigen FIA, and DiaSorin Simplexa™ COVID-19 Direct assays, with cycle threshold (CT) adjustments to approximate direct-specimen testing based on gene-target doubling each PCR cycle. Logistic regression was used to model assay performance by specimen CT. These models were applied to CT distributions of symptomatic and asymptomatic populations presenting to emergency services to predict the percentage of specimens that would be detected by each assay. A 96-sample paired-swab study was conducted to confirm model results. RESULTS: When using direct nasopharyngeal samples and fit with either VTM or limit-of-detection data, percent positivities for ID NOW (symptomatic 94.9%/97.4%; asymptomatic 88.4.0%/89.6%) and Simplexa (symptomatic 97.8%/97.2%; asymptomatic 91.1%/90.8%) were predicted to be similar. Likewise, percent positivities for ID NOW with direct nasal specimens (symptomatic 77.8%; asymptomatic 64.5%) and, fit with VTM data, Sofia 2 with direct nasopharyngeal specimens (symptomatic 76.6%, asymptomatic 60.3%) were similar. The paired-swab study comparing direct nasopharyngeal specimens on ID NOW and nasopharyngeal VTM specimens on Simplexa showed 99% concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Assay performance can be modeled as dependent on viral load, fit using laboratory bench study results, and adjusted to account for direct-specimen testing. When using nasopharyngeal specimens, direct testing on Abbott ID NOW and VTM testing on DiaSorin Simplexa have similar performance. | |
dc.format.medium | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) | |
dc.subject | infectious disease | |
dc.subject | laboratory methods and tools | |
dc.subject | point-of-care testing systems | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 Testing | |
dc.subject | Disease Progression | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Nasopharynx | |
dc.subject | SARS-CoV-2 | |
dc.subject | Sensitivity and Specificity | |
dc.title | Predicting Direct-Specimen SARS-CoV-2 Assay Performance Using Residual Patient Samples | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34755849 | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/174159/2/34755849.nbib | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/jalm/jfab159 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5890 | |
dc.identifier.source | The journal of applied laboratory medicine | |
dc.description.version | Published version | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-09-02T15:57:03Z | |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-2507-6987 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of 34755849.nbib : Published version | |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 661 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 673 | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Schroeder, LF | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Bachman, MA; 0000-0003-2507-6987 | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Idoni, A | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Gegenheimer-Holmes, J | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Kronick, SL | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Valdez, R | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Lephart, PR | |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/5890 | en |
dc.owningcollname | Pathology, Department of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.