View Item 

Show simple item record

Birds of a feather flock (even more) together: An intergroup relations perspective on how #MeToo-related media coverage affects the evaluation of prospective corporate directors
dc.contributor.authorBednar, Michael K.
dc.contributor.authorWestphal, James D.
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Michael L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-09T21:18:07Z
dc.date.available2023-12-09 16:18:05en
dc.date.available2022-11-09T21:18:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.identifier.citationBednar, Michael K.; Westphal, James D.; McDonald, Michael L. (2022). "Birds of a feather flock (even more) together: An intergroup relations perspective on how #MeToo-related media coverage affects the evaluation of prospective corporate directors." Strategic Management Journal 43(11): 2313-2350.
dc.identifier.issn0143-2095
dc.identifier.issn1097-0266
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175089
dc.description.abstractResearch SummaryThis study examines how incumbent director reactions to media coverage of the #MeToo movement have impacted the evaluation of prospective corporate directors. We argue that heightened intergroup anxiety related to male–female interactions leads incumbents to seize on social attributes that bolster category-based trust in the reliability of prospective directors’ interpersonal behavior. We predict that in response to #MeToo coverage, incumbents evaluate board candidates more positively when they share demographic characteristics or have prior social connections, and these effects are strengthened when incumbents socially identify with the firm. Empirical analyses using a longitudinal survey of evaluations of director candidates support these predictions. Our findings suggest how social movements can produce unintended consequences by inadvertently triggering psychological processes that partially offset the anticipated benefits of the movement.Managerial SummaryIncreased coverage of #MeToo has heightened concerns among board members about male–female interactions on the board. Our study finds that as #MeToo coverage increases, incumbent directors evaluate potential board candidates more positively to the extent that they share demographic characteristics, including gender, race, functional background, education and age, or when they are connected through the social network of board appointments. These effects are especially pronounced for incumbents who psychologically identify with the firm, meaning that their self-concept is aligned with features of the organization. Our study suggests how psychological reactions of corporate directors to #MeToo may inadvertently reduce board diversity and overall board effectiveness, and we call for research-based interventions to correct this unfortunate side effect of a critically important social justice movement.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.subject.otherexecutive leadership
dc.subject.otherboard diversity
dc.subject.otherboards of directors
dc.subject.othercorporate governance
dc.subject.otherdirector selection
dc.titleBirds of a feather flock (even more) together: An intergroup relations perspective on how #MeToo-related media coverage affects the evaluation of prospective corporate directors
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomics
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelFilm and Video Studies
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagement
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrban Planning
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelArts
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175089/1/smj3405.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175089/2/smj3405_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smj.3405
dc.identifier.sourceStrategic Management Journal
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenfro, C. L., Duran, A., Stephan, W. G., & Clason, D. L. ( 2006 ). The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 41 – 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuzuki-Crumly, J., & Hyers, L. L. ( 2004 ). The relationship among ethnic identity, psychological well-being, and intergroup competence: An investigation in biracial groups. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10, 137 – 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTajfel, H. E. ( 1978 ). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTajfel, H. E. ( 2010 ). Social identity and intergroup relations (Vol. 7 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTajfel, H. E., & Turner, J. ( 1979 ). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33 – 47 ). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. ( 2009 ). Female directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17 ( 3 ), 320 – 337.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTian, J., Haleblian, J., & Rajagopalan, N. ( 2011 ). The effects of board human and social capital on investor reactions to new CEO selection. Strategic Management Journal, 32 ( 7 ), 731 – 747.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. ( 1992 ). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 ( 4 ), 549 – 579.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. ( 2008 ). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 ( 4 ), 843 – 860.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUseem, M. ( 1984 ). The inner circle: Large corporations and business politics in the US and UK. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUseem, M., & Karabel, J. ( 1986 ). Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review, 51, 184 – 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. ( 2003 ). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11 ( 3 ), 218 – 234.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVermue, M., Seger, C. R., & Sanfey, A. G. ( 2018 ). Group-based biases influence learning about individual trustworthiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 36 – 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard, A. J., & Feldman, D. C. ( 2008 ). Survival of the embedded: Expelling and embedding forces on members of the corporate elite. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 ( 3 ), 239 – 251.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. ( 2005 ). Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms’ strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50 ( 2 ), 262 – 298.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. ( 2000 ). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 ( 2 ), 366 – 398.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestphal, J. D., & Park, S. H. ( 2020 ). Symbolic management: Governance, strategy, and institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. ( 1995 ). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 60 – 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliamson, I. O., & Cable, D. M. ( 2003 ). Organizational hiring patterns, interfirm network ties, and interorganizational imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 46 ( 3 ), 349 – 358.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWithers, M. C., Corley, K. G., & Hillman, A. J. ( 2012 ). Stay or leave: Director identities and voluntary exit from the board during organizational crisis. Organization Science, 23 ( 3 ), 835 – 850.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWithers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. ( 2012 ). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38 ( 1 ), 243 – 277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWooldridge, J. M. ( 2002 ). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. ( 2010 ). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 1024 – 1083 ). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZald, M. N., Morrill, C., & Rao, H. ( 2005 ). The impact of social movements on organizations: Environment and responses. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 253 – 279 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Hubbard, T. D. ( 2016 ). Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59 ( 1 ), 253 – 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhu, D. H. ( 2013 ). Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 800 – 822.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhu, D. H., Shen, W., & Hillman, A. J. ( 2014 ). Recategorization into the in-group: The appointment of demographically different new directors and their subsequent positions on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59 ( 2 ), 240 – 270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhu, D. H., & Westphal, J. D. ( 2014 ). How directors’ prior experience with other demographically similar CEOs affects their appointments onto corporate boards and the consequences for CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 57 ( 3 ), 791 – 813.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZweigenhaft, R. L., & Domhoff, G. W. ( 2018 ). Diversity in the power elite ( 3rd ed. ). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W. & Wooldridge, J. ( 2017 ). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? NBER working paper 24003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAberson, C. L., & Gaffney, A. M. ( 2009 ). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808 – 830.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAcharya, A. G., & Pollock, T. G. ( 2013 ). Shoot for the stars? Predicting the recruitment of prestigious directors at newly public firms. Academy of Management Journal, 56 ( 5 ), 1396 – 1419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshford, S. J., & Barton, M. A. ( 2007 ). Identity-based issue selling. In C. A. Bartel, S. Blader, & A. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization (pp. 223 – 244 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. ( 2008 ). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34 ( 3 ), 325 – 374.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshforth, B. E., & Mael, F. ( 1989 ). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14 ( 1 ), 20 – 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. ( 2014 ). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140 ( 6 ), 1556 – 1581.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartel, C. ( 2001 ). Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 ( 3 ), 379 – 413.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartels, J., Pruyn, A., de Jong, M., & Joustra, I. ( 2007 ). Multiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication culture. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 173 – 190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. ( 2002 ). Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 ( 1 ), 92 – 124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBednar, M. K. ( 2012 ). Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Academy of Management Journal, 55 ( 1 ), 131 – 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBednar, M. K., Boivie, S., & Prince, N. R. ( 2013 ). Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organization Science, 24 ( 3 ), 910 – 925.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenton, R. A. ( 2017 ). The decline of social entrenchment: Social network cohesion and board responsiveness to shareholder activism. Organization Science, 28 ( 2 ), 262 – 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. ( 2000 ). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39 ( 4 ), 555 – 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger, C. R. ( 1979 ). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122 – 144 ). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. ( 2016 ). Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Academy of Management Annals, 10 ( 1 ), 319 – 407.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoivie, S., Graffin, S. D., & Pollock, T. G. ( 2012 ). Time for me to fly: Predicting director exit at large firms. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1334 – 1359.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoivie, S., Lange, D. A., McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. ( 2011 ). Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 551 – 576.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. ( 2011 ). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16 ( 3 ), 265 – 284.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBollen, K. A., & Diamantopoulos, S. ( 2017 ). In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report. Psychological Methods, 22 ( 3 ), 581 – 596.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrewer, M. B. ( 1981 ). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 214 – 231 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. ( 1998 ). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 554 – 594 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurris, V. ( 2005 ). Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 249 – 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G., & Gregersen, H. B. ( 2001 ). Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 493 – 511.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. ( 2001 ). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44 ( 4 ), 639 – 660.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, G., Hambrick, D. C., & Pollock, T. G. ( 2008 ). Puttin’ on the Ritz: Pre-IPO enlistment of prestigious affiliates as deadline-induced remediation. Academy of Management Journal, 51 ( 5 ), 954 – 975.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChu, J. S., & Davis, G. F. ( 2016 ). Who killed the inner circle? The decline of the American corporate interlock network. American Journal of Sociology, 122 ( 3 ), 714 – 754.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. ( 2010 ). Sell-side school ties. The Journal of Finance, 65, 1409 – 1437.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman, J. S. ( 1988 ). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95 – S120.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorenblum, B., & Stephan, W. G. ( 2001 ). White fears and native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to inter- group attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 251 – 268.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCortina, L. M., & Berdahl, J. L. ( 2008 ). Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 469 – 497 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrossland, C., Zyung, J., Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. ( 2014 ). CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 57 ( 3 ), 652 – 674.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaum, J., McCarthy, L., & Yerger, A. ( 2017 ). Board composition: A slow evolution. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/12/26/board-composition-a-slow-evolution/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, G. F. ( 1993 ). Who gets ahead in the market for corporate directors: The political economy of multiple board memberships. In Academy of management best paper proceedings (pp. 202 – 206 ). Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobbin, F. ( 2009 ). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobbin, F., & Jung, J. ( 2011 ). Board diversity and corporate performance: Filling in the gaps: Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias. North Carolina Law Review, 89 ( 3 ), 809 – 839.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobbin, F., & Kalev, A. ( 2007 ). The architecture of inclusion: Evidence from corporate diversity programs. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 30 ( 2 ), 279 – 301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobbin, F., & Kalev, A. ( 2017 ). Are diversity programs merely ceremonial? Evidence-free institutionalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 808 – 828 ). London: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobbin, F., Schrage, D., & Kalev, A. ( 2015 ). Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. American Sociological Review, 80 ( 5 ), 1014 – 1044.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDomhoff, G. W. ( 2002 ). The power elite, public policy, and public opinion. In J. Manza, F. L. Cook, & B. I. Page (Eds.), Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy, and the future of American democracy (pp. 124 – 137 ). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDomhoff, G. W. ( 2010 ). Who rules America?: Challenges to corporate and class dominance. New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. ( 2010 ). Intergroup bias. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 1084 – 1121 ). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. ( 2002 ). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 ( 3 ), 507 – 533.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. ( 1994 ). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99 ( 6 ), 1411 – 1454.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrin, D. L., Dirks, K. T., & Shah, P. P. ( 2006 ). Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 ( 4 ), 870 – 883.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkelstein, S. ( 1992 ). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35 ( 3 ), 505 – 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiske, S. T. ( 1998 ). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357 – 411 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. ( 1997 ). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 ( 4 ), 578 – 589.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFligstein, N. ( 1990 ). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler, F. J. ( 2014 ). Survey research methods ( 5th ed. ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFracassi, C., & Tate, G. ( 2012 ). External networking and internal firm governance. The Journal of Finance, 67 ( 1 ), 153 – 194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. ( 1989 ). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 ( 2 ), 239 – 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalvin, B. M., Lange, D., & Ashforth, B. E. ( 2015 ). Narcissistic organizational identification: Seeing oneself as central to the organization’s identity. Academy of Management Review, 40, 163 – 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamache, D. L., & McNamara, G. ( 2019 ). Responding to bad press: How CEO temporal focus influences the sensitivity to negative media coverage of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 62 ( 3 ), 918 – 943.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeletkanycz, M. A., & Boyd, B. K. ( 2011 ). CEO outside directorships and firm performance: A reconciliation of agency and embeddedness views. Academy of Management Journal, 54 ( 2 ), 335 – 352.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiugni, M. ( 2008 ). Political, biographical, and cultural consequences of social movements. Sociology Compass, 2 ( 5 ), 1582 – 1600.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraf-Vlachy, L., Oliver, A. G., Banfield, R., König, A., & Bundy, J. ( 2020 ). Media coverage of firms: Background, integration, and directions for future research. Journal of Management, 46 ( 1 ), 36 – 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham, M. E., Belliveau, M. A., & Hotchkiss, J. L. ( 2017 ). The view at the top or signing at the bottom? Workplace diversity responsibility and women’s representation in management. ILR Review, 70 ( 1 ), 223 – 258.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranovetter, M. ( 1985 ). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 ( 3 ), 481 – 510.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGulati, R., & Westphal, J. D. ( 1999 ). Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 ( 3 ), 473 – 506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. ( 1984 ). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 ( 2 ), 193 – 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHambrick, D. C., Misangyi, V. F., & Park, C. A. ( 2015 ). The quad model for identifying a corporate director’s potential for effective monitoring: Toward a new theory of board sufficiency. Academy of Management Review, 40 ( 3 ), 323 – 344.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F. ( 2013 ). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. ( 2010 ). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31 ( 11 ), 1145 – 1163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeider, F. ( 1958 ). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeidrick & Struggles. ( 2019 ). Board Monitor.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. ( 2002 ). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 ( 1 ), 575 – 604.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. ( 2008 ). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19 ( 3 ), 441 – 456.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInsko, C. A., Schopler, J., & Sedikides, C. ( 1998 ). Differential distrust of groups and individuals. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 75 – 107 ). Lawrence: Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, M. D., Morgeson, F. P., Ilgen, D. R., Meyer, C. J., & Lloyd, J. W. ( 2006 ). Multiple professional identities: Examining differences in identification across work-related targets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 ( 2 ), 498 – 506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoshi, A., Liao, H., & Jackson, S. E. ( 2006 ). Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay. Academy of Management Journal, 49 ( 3 ), 459 – 481.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1972 ). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3 ( 3 ), 430 – 454.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKanter, R. M. ( 2008 ). Men and women of the corporation ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Basic Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKantor, J., & Twohey, M. ( 2017 ). Harvey Weinstein paid off sexual harassment accusers for decades. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/us/harvey-weinstein-harassment-allegations.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKantor, J., & Twohey, M. ( 2019 ). She said: Breaking the sexual harassment story that ignited a movement. London, U.K.: Penguin Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnippen, J. M., Shen, W., & Zhu, Q. ( 2019 ). Limited progress? The effect of external pressure for board gender diversity on the increase of female directors. Strategic Management Journal, 40 ( 7 ), 1123 – 1150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolenikov, S., & Angeles, G. ( 2009 ). Socioeconomic status measurement with discrete proxy variables: Is principal component analysis a reliable answer? Review of Income and Wealth, 55, 128 – 165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. ( 1999 ). Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 ( 5 ), 770 – 782.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer, R. M. ( 1991 ). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191 – 228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer, R. M. ( 1999 ). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569 – 596.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer, R. M., & Lewicki, R. J. ( 2010 ). Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. Academy of Management Annals, 4 ( 1 ), 245 – 277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKu, G., Wang, C. S., & Galinsky, A. D. ( 2015 ). The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 79 – 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLange, D. A., Boivie, S., & Westphal, J. D. ( 2015 ). Predicting organizational identification at the CEO level. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1224 – 1244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarcker, D. F., So, E. C., & Wang, C. C. ( 2013 ). Boardroom centrality and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55 ( 2–3 ), 225 – 250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. ( 1979 ). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 ( 2 ), 181 – 199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorsch, J. W. ( 2012 ). The future of boards: Meeting the governance challenges of the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorsch, J. W., & Maclver, E. M. ( 1989 ). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s boards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. ( 1992 ). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103 – 123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMain, B. G., & Gregory-Smith, I. ( 2018 ). Symbolic management and the glass cliff: Evidence from the boardroom careers of female and male directors. British Journal of Management, 29 ( 1 ), 136 – 155.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaitlis, S. ( 2004 ). Taking it from the top: How CEOs influence (and fail to influence) their boards. Organization Studies, 25 ( 8 ), 1275 – 1311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkoczy, L., Sun, S. L., & Zhu, J. ( 2019 ). Few women on boards: What’s identity got to do with it? Journal of Business Ethics, 165 ( 2 ), 311 – 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, G., Gözübüyük, R., & Becerra, M. ( 2015 ). Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 36 ( 2 ), 235 – 253.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonald, M. L., Keeves, G. D., & Westphal, J. D. ( 2018 ). One step forward, one step back: White male top manager organizational identification and helping behavior toward other executives following the appointment of a female or racial minority CEO. Academy of Management Journal, 61 ( 2 ), 405 – 439.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. ( 2003 ). Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 ( 1 ), 1 – 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. ( 1999 ). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20, 47 – 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. ( 1989 ). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40 ( 1 ), 45 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMidanek, D. H. ( 2018 ). The governance revolution: What every board member needs to know, now!. Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. ( 2009 ). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46 ( 5 ), 755 – 786.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M. S. ( 2013 ). The fracturing of the American corporate elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoore, J. H., & Kraatz, M. S. ( 2011 ). Governance form and organizational adaptation: Lessons from the savings and loan industry in the 1980s. Organization Science, 22, 850 – 868.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMor-Barak, M. E. ( 2016 ). Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMun, E., & Jung, J. ( 2018 ). Change above the glass ceiling: Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity in Japanese firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63 ( 2 ), 409 – 440.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaumovska, I., Wernicke, G., & Zajac, E. J. ( 2020 ). Last to come and last to go? The complex role of gender and ethnicity in the reputational penalties for directors linked to corporate fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 63 ( 3 ), 881 – 902.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpper, S., & Burt, R. S. ( 2021 ). Social network and temporal myopia. Academy of Management Journal, 64, 741 – 771.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, D., & Barber, B. M. ( 2001 ). Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 ( 1 ), 87 – 120.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. ( 2009 ). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339 – 367.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiacenza, J. ( 2018 ). A year into #MeToo, public worried about false allegations. Morning Consult. https://morningconsult.com/2018/10/11/a-year-into-metoo-public-worried-about-false-allegations/
dc.identifier.citedreferencePonomareva, Y., Shen, W., & Umans, T. ( 2019 ). Organizational discretion, board control, and shareholder wealth: A contingency perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 27, 248 – 260.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePortes, A. ( 1998 ). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePortes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. ( 1993 ). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98 ( 6 ), 1320 – 1350.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasad, B., & Junni, P. ( 2017 ). A contingency model of CEO characteristics and firm innovativeness: The moderating role of organizational size. Management Decision, 55, 156 – 177.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. ( 2007 ). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42 ( 1 ), 185 – 227.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. ( 2006 ). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 ( 4 ), 336 – 353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiketta, M. ( 2005 ). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358 – 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelfhout, M., Denissen, J., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. ( 2009 ). In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1152 – 1165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShropshire, C. ( 2010 ). The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review, 35, 246 – 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmidts, A., Pruyn, A. T. H., & Van Riel, C. B. M. ( 2001 ). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1051 – 1062.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. ( 2004 ). Mapping the terrain. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 3 – 16 ). Hoboken: Wiley.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSobel, M. E. ( 1986 ). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology, 16, 159 – 186.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glas, B. ( 1992 ). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 ( 2 ), 207 – 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephan, W. G. ( 2014 ). Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18 ( 3 ), 239 – 255.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., & Renfro, C. L. ( 2002 ). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of blacks and whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 ( 9 ), 1242 – 1254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. ( 1985 ). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41 ( 3 ), 157 – 175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. ( 2018 ). Intergroup relations. New York: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W., & Gudykunst, W. B. ( 1999 ). Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23 ( 4 ), 613 – 628.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
smj3405.pdf
Size:
8.703MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
smj3405_am.pdf
Size:
527.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.