View Item 

Show simple item record

Comparative analysis of two biomaterials mixed with autogenous bone graft for vertical ridge augmentation: A histomorphometric study in humans
dc.contributor.authorGallo, Pier
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Báez, David
dc.contributor.authorPerdomo, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorAloise, Antonio Carlos
dc.contributor.authorTattan, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSaleh, Muhammad H. A.
dc.contributor.authorPelegrine, André Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRavidà, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-09T21:19:42Z
dc.date.available2023-11-09 16:19:32en
dc.date.available2022-11-09T21:19:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifier.citationGallo, Pier; Díaz-Báez, David ; Perdomo, Sandra; Aloise, Antonio Carlos; Tattan, Mustafa; Saleh, Muhammad H. A.; Pelegrine, André Antonio ; Ravidà, Andrea ; Wang, Hom-Lay (2022). "Comparative analysis of two biomaterials mixed with autogenous bone graft for vertical ridge augmentation: A histomorphometric study in humans." Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 24(5): 709-719.
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175117
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe vertical increase of the alveolar ridge dimension using allograft or xenograft mixed with autogenous bone graft and covered by a nonabsorbable high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane is well documented in the literature.PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess vital mineralized tissue formation in vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) procedures using autogenous bone chips mixed either with an allograft or a xenograft.MethodsThis prospective clinical trial recruited 16 partially edentulous patients to undergo vertical ridge augmentation in one or more sites, making up a total of 24 samples for histological evaluation. Patients were sequentially stratified into Group A (treated with a freeze-dried bone allograft [FDBA] mixed with autogenous bone) or to Group B (treated with a bovine xenograft mixed with autogenous bone). Histological samples were analyzed according to the biomaterial used for VRA. Histological samples were obtained on the same day of membrane removal and implant placement.ResultsThirty-three implants were placed in 16 sites of regenerated bone via VRA, 13 patients with ridge augmentation in the posterior mandible, and 3 patients with VRA in the anterior maxilla. Group A (FDBA + autogenous) and Group B (xenograft + autogenous) showed a percent vital mineralized tissue (VMT) area of 67.64 ± 16.84 and 60.93 ± 18.25, respectively. A significant difference between the two biomaterials was not observed.ConclusionWhen mixed with autogenous bone, either allografts or xenografts may provide a successful augmentation. Either mixture could serve as reliable alternative in VRA for obtaining a high percentage of VMT.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otheralveolar bone grafting
dc.subject.otherbone augmentation
dc.subject.otherbone substitutes
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.subject.otherguided bone regeneration
dc.titleComparative analysis of two biomaterials mixed with autogenous bone graft for vertical ridge augmentation: A histomorphometric study in humans
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175117/1/cid13124.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175117/2/cid13124_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.13124
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTroeltzsch M, Troeltzsch M, Kauffmann P, et al. Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44: 1618 - 1629.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban IA. Papilla reconstruction in conjuction with vertical augmentation in single tooth defects. In: Urban IA, ed. Vertical and Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: New Perspectives. Quintessence Publishing Co.; 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban IA, Lozada JL, Jovanovic SA, Nagursky H, Nagy K. Vertical ridge augmentation with titanium-reinforced, dense-PTFE membranes and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 19 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 185 - 193.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. Vertical ridge augmentation: surgical protocol and retrospective evaluation of 48 consecutively inserted implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998; 18: 434 - 443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006; 15: 8 - 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReynolds MA, Kao RT, Camargo PM, et al. Periodontal regeneration - intrabony defects: a consensus report from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86: S105 - S107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTattan M. Surgical regenerative therapy. In: Suárez López del Amo F, ed. Periodontics: the Complete Summary. Quintessence Publishing Co; 2021: 118 - 131.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent. 1993; 2: 158 - 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga PJ, Brouns JB, Hinderks F. Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 21: 204 - 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYildirim M, Spiekermann H, Handt S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 23 - 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion M, Fontana F, Rasperini G, Maiorana C. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (bio Oss). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 620 - 629.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendoza-Azpur G, Gallo P, Mayta-Tovalino F, Alva R, Valdivia E. A case series of vertical ridge augmentation using a nonresorbable membrane: a multicenter study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018; 38: 811 - 816.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban IA, Monje A, Lozada J, Wang HL. Principles for vertical ridge augmentation in the atrophic posterior mandible: a technical review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37: 639 - 645.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban IA, Saleh MHA, Ravida A, Forster A, Wang HL, Barath Z. Vertical bone augmentation utilizing a titanium-reinforced PTFE mesh: a multi-variate analysis of influencing factors. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32: 828 - 839.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanellas J, Ritto FG, Figueredo C, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of different grafting materials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 49: 797 - 810.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014; 93: 950 - 958.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeloni SM, Jovanovic SA, Urban I, Baldoni E, Pisano M, Tallarico M. Horizontal ridge augmentation using GBR with a native collagen membrane and 1:1 ratio of particulate xenograft and autologous bone: a 3-year after final loading prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21: 669 - 677.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 299 - 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNasr HF, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA. Bone and bone substitutes. Periodontol 2000. 2000; 1999 ( 19 ): 74 - 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong YW, Jung HJ, An YZ, Jung UW, Lee JS. Addition of autogenous bone chips to deproteinized bovine bone mineral does not have additional benefit in lateral ridge augmentation-a preclinical in vivo experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32: 1105 - 1114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaiorana C, Beretta M, Salina S, Santoro F. Reduction of autogenous bone graft resorption by means of bio-Oss coverage: a prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25: 19 - 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWen SC, Fu JH, Wang HL. Effect of deproteinized bovine bone mineral at implant dehiscence defects grafted by the Sandwich bone augmentation technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018; 38: 79 - 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanner SFM, Bosshardt DD, Cochran DL, et al. The influence of collagen membrane and autogenous bone chips on bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla: a preclinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1368 - 1380.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAludden H, Mordenfeld A, Cederlund A, et al. Radiographic changes in height and volume after lateral GBR procedures with different ratios of deproteinized bovine bone mineral and autogenous bone at different time points. An experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32: 167 - 179.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DC, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using two different xenograft protocols. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 585 - 594.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bio-Oss collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 55 - 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong YW, Rafikov K, Paeng KW, et al. Dimensional changes of the maxillary sinus augmented with a collagenated synthetic bone block or synthetic bone particulates: a pre-clinical study in rabbits. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47: 1416 - 1426.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion M, Ferrantino L, Idotta E, Zarone F. Turned implants in vertical augmented bone: a retrospective study with 13 to 21 years follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016; 36: 309 - 317.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban IA, Tattan M, Ravida A, Saleh MH, Tavelli L, Avila-Ortiz G. Simultaneous alveolar ridge augmentation and periodontal regenerative therapy leveraging recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB): A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Jun 30. doi: 10.11607/prd.6055. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35771596.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion M, Jovanovic SA, Trisi P, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants using a membrane technique and autogenous bone or allografts in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998; 18: 8 - 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24 ( Suppl ): 218 - 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouso-Queiruga E, Stuhr S, Tattan M, Chambrone L, Avila-Ortiz G. Post-extraction dimensional changes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2021; 48: 126 - 144.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 212 - 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocchietta I, Ferrantino L, Simion M. Vertical ridge augmentation in the esthetic zone. Periodontol 2000. 2000; 2018 ( 77 ): 241 - 255.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 203 - 215.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cid13124.pdf
Size:
54.76MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cid13124_am.pdf
Size:
27.53MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.