Show simple item record

Putting Humans Back in the Loop: An Affordance Conceptualization of the 4th Industrial Revolution

dc.contributor.authorMelville, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Lionel Jr
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Xiao
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T21:41:43Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T21:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-07
dc.identifier.citationMelville, N. P., Robert, L.P. and Xiao, X. (2023). Putting Humans Back in the Loop: An Affordance Conceptualization of the 4th Industrial Revolution, Information Systems Journal, forthcomingen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175258en
dc.description.abstractThe current technology epoch—sometimes called the fourth industrial revolution (4IR)—involves the innovative application of rapidly advancing digital technologies such as artificial intelligence. Societal implications of the 4IR are significant and wide-ranging, from life-saving drug development to privacy loss and app addiction. A review of the information systems literature, however, reveals a narrow focus on technology-enabled business benefits. Scant research attention has been paid to the role of humans and humanistic outcomes. To spur new research addressing these issues, formalized affordance theory is employed to develop a new 4IR conceptualization. Four groupings of affordances that capture salient 4IR action possibilities are developed within two categories: machine emulation of human cognition (expansive decision-making and creativity automation) and machine emulation of human communication (relationship with humans and intermachine teaming). Implications are explored in the context of human-machine coworking and the development of artificial intelligence safety regulations. Overall, the affordance conceptualization of the 4IR advances a new sociotechnical lexicon of action possibilities and their joint enactment in achieving humanistic and instrumental outcomes, enabling alignment of the scope of 4IR research with the scope of 4IR phenomena—and bringing humans back into the loop.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInformation Systems Journalen_US
dc.subjectfourth industrial revolutionen_US
dc.subjectdigital technologiesen_US
dc.subjectaffordancesen_US
dc.subjectsociotechnicalen_US
dc.subjecthuman cognitionen_US
dc.subjecttechnology-enabled businessen_US
dc.subjectformalized affordance theoryen_US
dc.subjectapp addictionen_US
dc.subjectprivacy losen_US
dc.subjectSocietal implicationsen_US
dc.subjectmachine emulationen_US
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectsociotechnical theoryen_US
dc.subjectHuman Robot Interactionen_US
dc.subjecthuman computer interactionen_US
dc.subjectTechnological determinismen_US
dc.subjectTechnology universalismen_US
dc.subjectCreativity Automationen_US
dc.subjectIntermachine teamingen_US
dc.subjectaffordance assemblagesen_US
dc.subject4IR affordancesen_US
dc.subjectAI regulationsen_US
dc.titlePutting Humans Back in the Loop: An Affordance Conceptualization of the 4th Industrial Revolutionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInformation, School ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumRoss Business Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCopenhagen Business Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175258/1/Melville et al. Forthcoming 4IRConceptualization2022.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/6639
dc.identifier.sourceInformation Systems Journalen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1410-2601en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Melville et al. Forthcoming 4IRConceptualization2022.pdf : Preprint
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidRobert, Lionel P.; 0000-0002-1410-2601en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/6639en_US
dc.owningcollnameInformation, School of (SI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.