Show simple item record

Home-based Cognitive Prehabilitation in Older Surgical Patients: a Feasibility Study

dc.contributor.authorVlisides, PE
dc.contributor.authorDas, AR
dc.contributor.authorThompson, AM
dc.contributor.authorKunkler, B
dc.contributor.authorZierau, M
dc.contributor.authorCantley, MJ
dc.contributor.authorMcKinney, AM
dc.contributor.authorGiordani, B
dc.coverage.spatialPhoenix, AZ USA
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T14:21:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-05T14:21:14Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557230
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175352en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cognitive training is beneficial in various clinical settings, although its perioperative feasibility and impact remain unknown. The objective of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of home-based cognitive prehabilitation before major surgery in older adults. Materials and Methods: Sixty-one patients were enrolled, randomized, and allocated to either a home-based preoperative cognitive training regimen or no training before surgery. Outcomes included postoperative delirium incidence (primary outcome; assessed with the 3D-Confusion Assessment Method), perioperative cognitive function based on NIH Toolbox measures, hospital length of stay, and physical therapy session participation. Reasons for declining enrollment were reported, as were reasons for opting out of the training program. Results: Postoperative delirium incidence was 6 of 23 (26%) in the prehabilitation group compared with 5 of 29 (17%) in the control group (P=0.507). There were no significant differences between groups in NIH Toolbox cognitive function scoring, hospital length of stay, or physical therapy participation rates. Study feasibility data were also collected and reported. The most common reasons for declining enrollment were lack of computer access (n=19), time commitment (n=9), and feeling overwhelmed (n=9). In the training group, only 5 of 29 (17%) included patients were able to complete the prescribed 7 days of training, and 14 of 29 (48%) opted out of training once home. Most common reasons were feeling overwhelmed (n=4) and computer difficulties (n=3). Conclusions: Short-term, home-based cognitive training before surgery is unlikely to be feasible for many older patients. Barriers to training include feeling overwhelmed, technical issues with training, and preoperative time commitment.
dc.description.sponsorshipSociety for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care
dc.languageeng
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectCognition Disorders
dc.subjectDelirium
dc.subjectFeasibility Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHome Care Services
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIncidence
dc.subjectLength of Stay
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNeuropsychological Tests
dc.subjectPatient Dropouts
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Modalities
dc.subjectPilot Projects
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectPreoperative Care
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleHome-based Cognitive Prehabilitation in Older Surgical Patients: a Feasibility Study
dc.typePresentation
dc.identifier.pmid30557230
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175352/2/Vlisides et alHome_based_Cognitive_Prehabilitation_in_Older.8.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ANA.0000000000000569
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/6733
dc.date.updated2023-01-05T14:21:11Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3899-5536
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5921-3455
dc.identifier.name-orcidVlisides, PE; 0000-0003-3899-5536
dc.identifier.name-orcidDas, AR
dc.identifier.name-orcidThompson, AM
dc.identifier.name-orcidKunkler, B
dc.identifier.name-orcidZierau, M
dc.identifier.name-orcidCantley, MJ
dc.identifier.name-orcidMcKinney, AM
dc.identifier.name-orcidGiordani, B; 0000-0001-5921-3455
dc.working.doi10.7302/6733en
dc.owningcollnameAnesthesiology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.