View Item 

Show simple item record

Assessment of donor quality and risk of graft failure after liver transplantation: The ID2EAL score
dc.contributor.authorAsrani, Sumeet K.
dc.contributor.authorSaracino, Giovanna
dc.contributor.authorWall, Anji
dc.contributor.authorTrotter, James F.
dc.contributor.authorTesta, Giuliano
dc.contributor.authorHernaez, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Pratima
dc.contributor.authorKwong, Allison
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Srikanta
dc.contributor.authorMcKenna, Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-11T16:22:01Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11 11:21:59en
dc.date.available2023-01-11T16:22:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.citationAsrani, Sumeet K.; Saracino, Giovanna; Wall, Anji; Trotter, James F.; Testa, Giuliano; Hernaez, Ruben; Sharma, Pratima; Kwong, Allison; Banerjee, Srikanta; McKenna, Gregory (2022). "Assessment of donor quality and risk of graft failure after liver transplantation: The ID2EAL score." American Journal of Transplantation (12): 2921-2930.
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175403
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othergraft failure
dc.subject.othergraft survival
dc.subject.otherprediction model
dc.subject.othermortality
dc.subject.otherdonor risk index
dc.subject.otherDCD
dc.titleAssessment of donor quality and risk of graft failure after liver transplantation: The ID2EAL score
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175403/1/ajt17191.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175403/2/ajt17191_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajt.17191
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantation
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChyou D, Karp S, Shah MB, Lynch R, Goldberg DS. A 6-month report on the impact of the organ procurement and transplantation network/united network for organ sharing acuity circles policy change. Liver Transpl. 2020; 27: 756 - 759.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg-Gresham JL, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant. 2006; 6: 783 - 790.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwong A, Kim WR, Lake JR, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2018 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 ( Suppl s1 ): 193 - 299.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCotter TG, Paul S, Sandikci B, et al. Improved graft survival after liver transplantation for recipients with hepatitis C virus in the direct-acting antiviral era. Liver Transpl. 2019; 25: 598 - 609.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim D, Li AA, Perumpail BJ, et al. Changing trends in etiology-based and ethnicity-based annual mortality rates of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 2019; 69: 1064 - 1074.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg D, Mantero A, Newcomb C, et al. Development and validation of a model to predict long-term survival after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2021; 27: 797 - 807.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurand F, Levitsky J, Cauchy F, Gilgenkrantz H, Soubrane O, Francoz C. Age and liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2019; 70: 745 - 758.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg D. An opposing view to United States liver allocation problems with broader sharing. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020; 25: 110 - 114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeimbach JK. United States liver allocation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020; 25: 104 - 109.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTolkacz M, Friedman JM, Koizumi N, Tang L, Ortiz J. United network for organ sharing Rule changes and their effects on kidney and liver transplant outcomes. Exp Clin Transplant. 2022; 20: 246 - 252.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuBay DA, MacLennan PA, Reed RD, et al. The impact of proposed changes in liver allocation policy on cold ischemia times and organ transportation costs. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15: 541 - 546.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasiske BL, Salkowski N, Wey A, Israni AK, Snyder JJ. Scientific registry of transplant recipients program-specific reports: where we have been and where we are going. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2019; 24: 58 - 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasiske BL, Pyke J, Snyder JJ. Continuous distribution as an organ allocation framework. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020; 25: 115 - 121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015; 350: g7594.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsrani SK, Saracino G, O’Leary JG, et al. Recipient characteristics and morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2018; 69: 989.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim WR, Stock PG, Smith JM, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2011 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 ( Suppl 1 ): 73 - 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampos-Varela I, Dodge JL, Stock PG, Terrault NA. Key donor factors associated with graft loss among liver transplant recipients with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Transplant. 2016; 30: 1140 - 1145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruggenwirth IMA, Dolgin NH, Porte RJ, Bozorgzadeh A, Martins PNA. Donor diabetes and prolonged cold ischemia time synergistically increase the risk of graft failure after liver transplantation. Transplant Direct. 2017; 3: e173.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, et al. New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385: 1737 - 1749.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsrani SK, Lim Y-S, Therneau TM, Pedersen RA, Heimbach J, Kim WR. Donor race does not predict graft failure after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2010; 138: 2341 - 2347.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDasari BV, Mergental H, Isaac JR, Muiesan P, Mirza DF, Perera T. Systematic review and meta-analysis of liver transplantation using grafts from deceased donors aged over 70 years. Clin Transplant. 2017; 31: e13139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolk ML, Tocco RS, Pelletier SJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Lok AS. Patient decision making about organ quality in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2011; 17: 1387 - 1393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolk ML, Lok AS, Pelletier SJ, Ubel PA, Hayward RA. Impact of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy on the use of high-risk organs for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135: 1568 - 1574.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Sima CS, Goodrich NP, Feng S, Merion RM. The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8: 419 - 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index. Transplantation. 2009; 88: 231 - 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertsimas D, Papalexopoulos T, Trichakis N, Wang Y, Hirose R, Vagefi PA. Balancing efficiency and fairness in liver transplant access: tradeoff curves for the assessment of organ distribution policies. Transplantation. 2020; 104: 981 - 987.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnyder JJ, Salkowski N, Wey A, Pyke J, Israni AK, Kasiske BL. Organ distribution without geographic boundaries: a possible framework for organ allocation. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18: 2635 - 2640.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDutkowski P, Oberkofler CE, Slankamenac K, et al. Are there better guidelines for allocation in liver transplantation? A novel score targeting justice and utility in the model for end-stage liver disease era. Ann Surg. 2011; 254: 745 - 753. discussion 753.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRana A, Hardy MA, Halazun KJ, et al. Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8: 2537 - 2546.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsrani SK, Saracino G, O’Leary JG, et al. Recipient characteristics and morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2018; 69: 43 - 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlegel A, Foley DP, Savier E, et al. Recommendations for donor and recipient selection and risk prediction: working group report from the ILTS consensus conference in DCD liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2021; 105: 1892 - 1903.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajt17191.pdf
Size:
1.852MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ajt17191_am.pdf
Size:
704.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.