Metacognition in older African American adults during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kero, Katherine; Woodard, John L.; Giordani, Bruno; Daugherty, Ana M.; Shair, Sarah; Hanna, Sophie; DiCerbo, Loraine M.; Kavcic, Voyko
2022-12
Citation
Kero, Katherine; Woodard, John L.; Giordani, Bruno; Daugherty, Ana M.; Shair, Sarah; Hanna, Sophie; DiCerbo, Loraine M.; Kavcic, Voyko (2022). "Metacognition in older African American adults during the COVID-19 pandemic." Alzheimer’s & Dementia 18: n/a-n/a.
Abstract
BackgroundThere is a critical need to identify older adults in the earliest stages of cognitive decline for targeted dementia reduction interventions. Subjective memory concerns often drive older adults to seek objective memory assessments. However, there is often poor agreement between subjective complaints and objective measures. Previous research suggests that self-appraised memory decline may be more sensitive to mild cognitive impairment than objective measures, but factors influencing the relationship between self-perceived and actual functioning are unclear. Subjective memory appraisal may be susceptible to negative affective perceptions such as anxiety. Anxiety has increased substantially during the pandemic, suggesting the heightened potential for it to distort subjective perceptions, thereby increasing demands for cognitive assessments. This study investigated whether the discrepancy between subjective cognitive concerns and objective cognitive performance is related to anxiety in a sample of older African American adults.MethodTelephone screenings were administered to 206 older African Americans (aged 64-94 years) during the first year of the pandemic as part of a more extensive study. Demographic data, objective memory (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [TICS]), subjective memory (Cognitive Change Questionnaire [CCQ]), and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]) were measured, along with survey questions about affective and stress responses to COVID-19 experiences.ResultObjective TICS scores were predictive of subjective CCQ executive function scores (F(1, 197) = 4.37, p = .038, R2 = .022). Discrepancy scores were calculated as the standardized residual variance between objective and subjective measures. Discrepancy scores were correlated with anxiety (r = .396, p<.001), indicating that higher anxiety was related to an overestimation of cognitive difficulty relative to the level of objective cognitive resources.ConclusionObjective and subjective measures of cognition are related. However, discrepancies exist between objectively-measured and self-perceived cognition. Elevation in anxiety level is associated with greater overestimation of cognitive difficulties relative to one’s objective level of cognition. As pandemic-related stressors have worsened anxiety for some, individuals with higher anxiety may also have depreciated their self-appraisal of cognitive abilities in the present climate. Clinicians should consider anxiety as a possible contributing factor when assessing subjective cognitive difficulties.Publisher
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
1552-5260 1552-5279
Other DOIs
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.