Show simple item record

US Adults’ Likelihood to Participate in Dementia Prevention Clinical Trials: Results from the National Poll on Healthy Aging

dc.contributor.authorCox, Chelsea G.
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Matthew A.
dc.contributor.authorGrill, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, J. Scott
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-11T16:27:00Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11 11:26:59en
dc.date.available2023-01-11T16:27:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.identifier.citationCox, Chelsea G.; Davis, Matthew A.; Grill, Joshua; Roberts, J. Scott (2022). "US Adults’ Likelihood to Participate in Dementia Prevention Clinical Trials: Results from the National Poll on Healthy Aging." Alzheimer’s & Dementia 18: n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn1552-5260
dc.identifier.issn1552-5279
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175505
dc.description.abstractBackgroundRecruitment to dementia prevention clinical trials is challenging, and participants are not representative of US adults at risk. To inform future recruitment strategies, the field needs a better understanding of public attitudes toward dementia prevention research.MethodWe analyzed data from a subset of respondents to the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging (October 2018 wave), ages 50-64, who completed a supplementary poll on dementia and brain health. Our primary outcome was likelihood to participate in a dementia prevention clinical trial (collapsed into very/somewhat likely versus not likely). Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between sociodemographic and dementia-related factors (e.g., family history) and likelihood to participate. Among respondents not likely to participate, we examined frequency of reasons endorsed, stratified by age, sex, and race/ethnicity.ResultAmong 1,028 respondents, 44% reported being at least somewhat likely (12% very likely) to participate in a dementia prevention trial. In adjusted analyses, there were no differences in likelihood to participate by sociodemographic characteristics. Factors associated with higher likelihood to participate were higher perceived likelihood to develop dementia [adjusted OR, 2.04 (95% CI, 1.53, 2.72)], family history of dementia [adjusted OR, 1.89 (95% CI, 1.38, 2.57)], and having discussed dementia prevention with a doctor [adjusted OR, 2.31 (95% CI, 1.20, 4.44)]. Among the 570 respondents not likely to participate, 38% did not want to be a guinea pig, 24% did not think dementia would affect them, 22% thought there would be too high a chance for harm, 16% indicated it would take too much time, and 5% reported fear of learning information about oneself. Compared to females, males more frequently endorsed that dementia would not affect them (28% versus 20%; p = 0.03). No other differences among demographic groups were observed.ConclusionIn this study, perceived risk of dementia, family history, and discussion of prevention with a doctor were associated with likelihood to participate in a dementia prevention clinical trial, whereas sociodemographic factors including race/ethnicity were not. This suggests that campaigns focused on dementia risk and prevention may be effective tools to improve enrollment rates, regardless of target community.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleUS Adults’ Likelihood to Participate in Dementia Prevention Clinical Trials: Results from the National Poll on Healthy Aging
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurology and Neurosciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175505/1/alz061509.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/alz.061509
dc.identifier.sourceAlzheimer’s & Dementia
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.