Show simple item record

Do sources of health information regarding COVID-19 differ among vaccinated and unvaccinated nursing students?

dc.contributor.authorSelby, Kendra
dc.contributor.advisorLapeyrouse, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T17:17:10Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175564
dc.description.abstractBackground: Vaccine hesitancy among nurses can contribute to patient hesitancy about the need for and safety of COVID-19 vaccination. Understanding and addressing vaccine hesitancy among nurses is a critical public health issue. Purpose: The current study aims to identify factors related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among nursing students attending the University of Michigan-Flint. Methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted using an online survey distributed to nursing students. A total of two hundred and thirty surveys were received, but after removing incomplete surveys, the final sample size was (n = 194). Descriptive statistics were conducted and analyzed to identify the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and reported sources of health information. Results: In this study, 87% of nursing students were vaccinated, and 12% were not. Unvaccinated nursing students (UNS) were older with a mean age of 40 vs 35 ( p < .001). The majority of UNS identified as having an “other” political affiliation compared to 41% of vaccinated nursing students who identified as Democrat/Liberal (33%) (p <.001). Vaccinated (73.4%) and unvaccinated (62.5%) nursing students both reported the CDC as their primary source of health information regarding COVID-19. Yet, a much larger percent of vaccinated nursing students (89.3% vs 58.3%) agreed/strongly agreed the CDC was a source of creditable and accurate health information (p < .001). Implications: To address vaccine hesitancy among nursing students, socio-demographic factors such as political affiliation and trust in governmental agencies need to be addressed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectstudent nursesen_US
dc.subjectvaccination rateen_US
dc.subjecthealth informationen_US
dc.subjectvaccine hesitancyen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subject.otherhealth educationen_US
dc.subject.othernursingen_US
dc.titleDo sources of health information regarding COVID-19 differ among vaccinated and unvaccinated nursing students?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Public Health (MPH)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePublic Healthen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan-Flinten_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJuly, Jori
dc.identifier.uniqname13201681en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175564/1/Selby2023.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/6778
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Selby2023.pdf : Thesis
dc.working.doi10.7302/6778en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.