View Item 

Show simple item record

The mystery of posttreatment cancer surveillance
dc.contributor.authorCho, Clifford S.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T18:56:40Z
dc.date.available2024-03-01 13:56:38en
dc.date.available2023-02-01T18:56:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-15
dc.identifier.citationCho, Clifford S. (2023). "The mystery of posttreatment cancer surveillance." Cancer 129(4): 503-504.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175729
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleThe mystery of posttreatment cancer surveillance
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175729/1/cncr34597_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175729/2/cncr34597.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.34597
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, Ciatto S, Pacini P, Distante V. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow up. JAMA. 1994; 271 ( 20 ): 1593 - 1597. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1593
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenamore R, Shepherd FA, Leighl N, et�al. Does intensive follow-up alter outcome in patients with advanced lung cancer? J Thoracic Oncol. 2007; 2 ( 4 ): 273 - 281. doi: 10.1097/01.jto.0000263708.08332.76
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTjandra JJ, Chen MK. Follow-up afer curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50 ( 11 ): 1783 - 1799.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMant D, Gray A, Pugh S, et�al. A randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus no scheduled follow-up in patients who have undergone resection for colorectal cancer with curative intent. Health Technol Assess. 2017; 21 ( 32 ): 1 - 86. doi: 10.3310/hta21320
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, et�al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 2011; 260 ( 3 ): 658 - 663. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110469
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014; 348 ( apr09 1 ): g2467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2467
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZauber AG. The impact of screening on colorectal cancer mortality and incidence: has it really made a difference? Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60 ( 3 ): 681 - 691. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3600-5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkelstein SD, Marsh W, Demtris AJ, et�al. Microdissection-based allelotyping discriminates de novo tumor from intrahepatic spread in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2003; 37 ( 4 ): 871 - 879. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50134
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi Q, Wang J, Juzi JT, et�al. Clonality analysis for multicentric origin and intrahepatic metastasis in recurrent and primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12 ( 9 ): 1540 - 1547. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0591-y
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFu Y, Li X, Yang Z, et�al. A risk-based post-resection follow-up strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2023; 129 ( 4 ): 569 - 579. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHatzaras I, Bischof DA, Fahy B, Cosgrove D, Pawlik TM. Treatment options and surveillance strategies after therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21 ( 3 ): 758 - 766. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3254-5
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr34597_am.pdf
Size:
512.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr34597.pdf
Size:
135.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.