Show simple item record

Diving into debate: Comparing discussion-based and single-presenter journal club formats in a large PM&R department

dc.contributor.authorHearn, Sandra L.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Sean R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T18:58:38Z
dc.date.available2024-02-01 13:58:36en
dc.date.available2023-02-01T18:58:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-01
dc.identifier.citationHearn, Sandra L.; Smith, Sean R. (2023). "Diving into debate: Comparing discussion-based and single-presenter journal club formats in a large PM&R department." PM&R 15(1): 80-86.
dc.identifier.issn1934-1482
dc.identifier.issn1934-1563
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175774
dc.description.abstractBackgroundJournal clubs in physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) advance the educational mission by uniting colleagues to learn of literature updates, consider clinical applications, practice critical thinking, and engage in lively dialogue and community. Although discussion-based journal clubs have been shown to enhance quality, a model for their application across a large and clinically diverse department of PM&R has not been described, nor has one been evaluated in comparison to a single-speaker podium format.ObjectiveTo develop a discussion-based PM&R department-wide journal club, present elements of the journal club model in a manner that would enable replication, and assess effectiveness as perceived by participants, compared to the prior (podium-based, single-speaker) format. It was hypothesized that a discussion-based journal club would more effectively achieve educational goals and would be perceived by participants to be of greater quality and value.DesignPre-post educational intervention study, using surveys of PM&R resident and faculty participants. Survey items used a 5-point Likert scale. Unpaired 2-tailed t-tests were used to compare the formats.SettingA large academic PM&R department.ParticipantsPM&R faculty, residents, fellows: 26 respondents (preintervention) and 26 respondents (postintervention) out of a total of 94 and 98 people invited to participate, respectively.InterventionsA discussion-based departmental journal club was designed and implemented, replacing the previous single-speaker, podium-based journal club.Main Outcome MeasuresPre- and post- intervention respondent ratings of (a) journal club quality and value, and (b) effectiveness in achieving specific educational goals.ResultsCompared to the traditional format, the discussion-based format more effectively met the educational objectives, was of higher quality and value as perceived by respondents, and increased desire to attend the activity.ConclusionsThis discussion-based journal club format can serve as a model for academic PM&R programs looking to enhance the educational value of journal club.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.titleDiving into debate: Comparing discussion-based and single-presenter journal club formats in a large PM&R department
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelKinesiology and Sports
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175774/1/pmrj12730_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175774/2/pmrj12730.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pmrj.12730
dc.identifier.sourcePM&R
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoekaerts M. Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learn Instr. 1997; 7 ( 2 ): 161 - 186.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoberg-Wolff EA, Kosasih JB. Journal clubs. Prevalence, format, and efficacy in PM&R. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 74 ( 3 ): 224 - 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbbert JO, Montori VM, Schultz HJ. The journal club in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2001; 23 ( 5 ): 455 - 461.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMimouni M, Cismariu-Potash K, Ratmansky M, Shaklai S, Amir H, Mimouni-Bloch A. Trends in physical medicine and rehabilitation publications over the past 16 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97 ( 6 ): 1030 - 1033.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlguire PC. A review of journal clubs in postgraduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13 ( 5 ): 347 - 353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell ST, Kang JR, Bishop JA. What makes Journal Club effective?—a survey of orthopaedic residents and faculty. J Surg Educ. 2018; 75 ( 3 ): 722 - 729.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee AG, Boldt HC, Golnik KC, et al. Using the Journal Club to teach and assess competence in practice-based learning and improvement: a literature review and recommendation for implementation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005; 50 ( 6 ): 542 - 548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDirschl DR, Tornetta P, Bhandari M. Designing, conducting, and evaluating journal clubs in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 413: 146 - 157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeenadayalan Y, Grimmer-Somers K, Prior M, Kumar S. How to run an effective journal club: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14 ( 5 ): 898 - 911.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBounds R, Boone S. The flipped journal club. West J Emerg Med. 2018; 19 ( 1 ): 23 - 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartzell JD, Veerappan GR, Posley K, Shumway NM, Durning SJ. Resident run journal club: a model based on the adult learning theory. Med Teach. 2009; 31 ( 4 ): e156 - e161.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Houten-Schat MA, Berkhout JJ, van Dijk N, Endedijk MD, Jaarsma AD, Diemers AD. Self-regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2018; 52 ( 10 ): 1008 - 1015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkhout JJ, Helmich E, Teunissen PW, van der Vleuten CP, Jaarsma AD. Context matters when striving to promote active and lifelong learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2018; 52 ( 1 ): 34 - 44.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.