Show simple item record

Interprofessional Image Verification Workshop for Physician and Physics Residents: A Multi-Institutional Experience

dc.contributor.authorPadilla, L
dc.contributor.authorBurmeister, JW
dc.contributor.authorBurnett, OL
dc.contributor.authorCovington, EL
dc.contributor.authorDen, RB
dc.contributor.authorDominello, MM
dc.contributor.authorDu, KL
dc.contributor.authorGalavis, PE
dc.contributor.authorJunell, S
dc.contributor.authorKahn, J
dc.contributor.authorKishore, M
dc.contributor.authorMooney, K
dc.contributor.authorMukhopadhyay, ND
dc.contributor.authorStudenski, MT
dc.contributor.authorYechieli, RL
dc.contributor.authorFields, EC
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T22:12:49Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T22:12:49Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-15
dc.identifier.issn0360-3016
dc.identifier.issn1879-355X
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175834en
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Verification of patient position through pretreatment setup imaging is crucial in modern radiation therapy. As treatment complexity increases and technology evolves, physicist-physician collaboration becomes imperative for safe and successful radiation delivery. Despite the importance of both, residency programs lack formal interprofessional education (IPE) activities or structured training for image verification. Here we show the impact of an interprofessional image verification workshop for residents in a multi-institutional setting. Methods: The workshop included a lecture by the attending physicist and physician, and hands-on image registration practice by learners (medical physics residents, MP; and radiation oncology residents, RO). All participants filled out pre- and postactivity surveys and rated their comfort from 1 to 10 in (A) selecting what type of imaging to order for a given case and (B) independently assessing the setup quality based on imaging. A paired 1-tailed t test (α = 0.05) was used to evaluate significance; Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation of ratings and RO postgraduate year (PGY). Surveys had free-response questions about IPE and image verification activities in residency. Results: A total of 71 residents from 7 institutions participated between 2018 and 2020. Pre- and postsurveys were completed by 50 residents (38RO, 12MP) and showed an increase in (A) from 5.5 ± 2.2 to 7.1 ± 1.6 (P <.001) and in (B) from 5.1 ± 2.3 to 6.8 ± 1.5 (P <.001), with significant increases per subgroup (AΔ, RO = 1.8 ± 1.7, P <.001; BΔ, RO = 1.9 ± 1.8, P <. 001; AΔ, MP = 1.1 ± 1.4, P =.012; BΔ, MP = 1.2 ± 1.6, P =.016). RO confidence scores moderately correlated with PGY. Survey responses indicated that image verification training is mostly unstructured, with extent of exposure varying by program and attending; most with little-to-no training. Time constraints were identified as the main barrier. IPE was noted as a useful way to incorporate different perspectives into the process. Conclusions: Formal image verification training increases resident comfort with setup imaging review and provides opportunities for interprofessional collaboration in radiation oncology residency programs.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectClinical Competence
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternship and Residency
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.titleInterprofessional Image Verification Workshop for Physician and Physics Residents: A Multi-Institutional Experience
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.identifier.pmid34380009
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175834/2/PIIS0360301621026195.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1706
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/6968
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2023-02-16T22:12:47Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6431-6643
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2018-4316
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of PIIS0360301621026195.pdf : Published version
dc.identifier.volume111
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage1058
dc.identifier.endpage1065
dc.identifier.name-orcidPadilla, L; 0000-0001-6431-6643
dc.identifier.name-orcidBurmeister, JW
dc.identifier.name-orcidBurnett, OL
dc.identifier.name-orcidCovington, EL; 0000-0002-2018-4316
dc.identifier.name-orcidDen, RB
dc.identifier.name-orcidDominello, MM
dc.identifier.name-orcidDu, KL
dc.identifier.name-orcidGalavis, PE
dc.identifier.name-orcidJunell, S
dc.identifier.name-orcidKahn, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidKishore, M
dc.identifier.name-orcidMooney, K
dc.identifier.name-orcidMukhopadhyay, ND
dc.identifier.name-orcidStudenski, MT
dc.identifier.name-orcidYechieli, RL
dc.identifier.name-orcidFields, EC
dc.working.doi10.7302/6968en
dc.owningcollnameRadiation Oncology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.