Show simple item record

Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations.

dc.contributor.authorResnicow, K
dc.contributor.authorDelacroix, E
dc.contributor.authorChen, G
dc.contributor.authorAustin, S
dc.contributor.authorStoffel, E
dc.contributor.authorHanson, EN
dc.contributor.authorGerido, LH
dc.contributor.authorKaphingst, KA
dc.contributor.authorYashar, BM
dc.contributor.authorMarvin, M
dc.contributor.authorGriggs, JJ
dc.contributor.authorCragun, D
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T19:55:24Z
dc.date.available2023-02-20T19:55:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-30
dc.identifier.issn1059-7700
dc.identifier.issn1573-3599
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906848
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175846en
dc.description.abstractGenetic counselors (GCs) have traditionally been trained to adopt a position of equipoise or clinical neutrality. They provide information, answer questions, address barriers, and engage in shared decision-making, but generally, they do not prescribe a genetic test. Historically, GCs have generally been trained not to persuade the ambivalent or resistant patient. More recently, however, there has been discussion regarding when a greater degree of persuasion or directionality may be appropriate within genetic counseling (GC) and what role MI may play in this process. The role for “persuasive GC” is based on the premise that some genetic tests provide actionable information that would clearly benefit patients and families by impacting treatment or surveillance. For other tests, the benefits are less clear as they do not directly impact patient care or the benefits may be more subjective in nature, driven by patient values or psychological needs. For the former, we propose that GCs may adopt a more persuasive clinical approach while for the latter, a more traditional equipoise stance may be more appropriate. We suggest that motivational interviewing (MI) could serve as a unifying counseling model that allows GCs to handle both persuasive and equipoise encounters. For clearly beneficial tests, while directional, the MI encounter can still be non-directive, autonomy-supportive, and patient-centered. MI can also be adapted for equipoise situations, for example, placing less emphasis on eliciting and strengthening change talk as that is more a behavior change strategy than a shared decision-making strategy. The core principles and strategies of MI, such as autonomy support, evocation, open questions, reflective listening, and affirmation would apply to both persuasive and equipoise encounters. Key issues that merit discussion include how best to train GCs both during their initial and post-graduate education.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectcounseling techniques
dc.subjectdecision-making
dc.subjecteducation
dc.subjectprofessional development
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectCounseling
dc.subjectGenetic Counseling
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMotivational Interviewing
dc.subjectPersuasive Communication
dc.titleMotivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations.
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid35906848
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175846/2/Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jgc4.1609
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/6980
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of genetic counseling
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2023-02-20T19:55:20Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1416-9627
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0807-3258
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1598-4562
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage1020
dc.identifier.endpage1031
dc.identifier.name-orcidResnicow, K; 0000-0003-1416-9627
dc.identifier.name-orcidDelacroix, E
dc.identifier.name-orcidChen, G
dc.identifier.name-orcidAustin, S
dc.identifier.name-orcidStoffel, E
dc.identifier.name-orcidHanson, EN
dc.identifier.name-orcidGerido, LH
dc.identifier.name-orcidKaphingst, KA
dc.identifier.name-orcidYashar, BM; 0000-0003-0807-3258
dc.identifier.name-orcidMarvin, M
dc.identifier.name-orcidGriggs, JJ; 0000-0002-1598-4562
dc.identifier.name-orcidCragun, D
dc.working.doi10.7302/6980en
dc.owningcollnamePublic Health, School of (SPH)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.