Show simple item record

Single-rooted extraction socket classification: A systematic review and proposal of a new classification system based on morphologic and patient-related factors

dc.contributor.authorSabri, Hamoun
dc.contributor.authorBarootchi, Shayan
dc.contributor.authorHeck, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-03T21:07:51Z
dc.date.available2024-02-03 16:07:50en
dc.date.available2023-03-03T21:07:51Z
dc.date.issued2023-01
dc.identifier.citationSabri, Hamoun; Barootchi, Shayan; Heck, Teresa; Wang, Hom-Lay (2023). "Single- rooted extraction socket classification: A systematic review and proposal of a new classification system based on morphologic and patient- related factors." Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 35(1): 168-182.
dc.identifier.issn1496-4155
dc.identifier.issn1708-8240
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/175872
dc.description.abstractTaxonomy and classification of a disease contributes to facilitating the diagnosis and treatment planning process and simplifies communication between clinicians. The aim of this study was to provide a critical appraisal based on a systematic review of the single-rooted extraction socket (ES) classifications and subsequently, introduce a new classification system combining the cornerstones of the previously proposed systems and based on the latest consensus in implant dentistry. Following the systematic search process in PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases 13 ES classifications were detected. The most repeated hard and soft tissue factors in the previous classifications were buccal bone dehiscence, interproximal bone, gingival recession, and soft tissue phenotype. However, there was minimal attention to patient-related factors such as systemic conditions and smoking. Therefore, a new classification system based on the combination of patient-related factors, clinical and radiographical parameters was proposed. This divides an ES into three types. Class I and II sockets are candidates for receiving immediate implant placement and conversely, a class III socket includes a compromised condition that requires multiple-stage reconstruction mostly suitable for standard delayed implant placement with alveolar ridge preservation. Within the limitations of this study, the new classification system not only provides comprehensive inclusion of various crucial parameters in implant placement (such as prediction of future implant position and osteotomy difficulty, etc.) but also, in contrast to the previously introduced systems, is able to classify the ES prior to extraction and also, takes into the account the patient-related factors as the class modifiers following the extraction.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherimmediate implants
dc.subject.otherextraction socket
dc.subject.otherclassification
dc.subject.otherdental socket
dc.titleSingle-rooted extraction socket classification: A systematic review and proposal of a new classification system based on morphologic and patient-related factors
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175872/1/jerd12967.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/175872/2/jerd12967_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jerd.12967
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin M-H, Mau L-P, Cochran DL, Shieh Y-S, Huang P-H, Huang R-Y. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study. J Dent. 2014; 42: 263 - 270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDemircan S. Prosthetically driven immediate implant placement at lower molar area; an anatomical study. Eur Oral Res. 2020; 54: 25 - 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatsoulis J, Pazera P, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 11: 238 - 245.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohammadi A, Dehkordi NR, Mahmoudi S, et al. Effects of drugs and chemotherapeutic agents on dental implant osseointegration: narrative review. Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2022; 17. doi: 10.2174/2772432817666220607114559
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Persson GR. Periodontitis as a potential risk factor for peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36 ( suppl 10 ): 9 - 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagenberg B, Froum SJ. A retrospective study of 1925 consecutively placed immediate implants from 1988 to 2004. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 71 - 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee J, Park D, Koo K-T, Seol Y-J, Lee Y-M. Comparison of immediate implant placement in infected and non-infected extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018; 76: 338 - 345.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaijeva A, Juodzbalys G. Immediate implant placement in non-infected sockets versus infected sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2020; 11: e1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee W. Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 47: 57 - 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 1933 - 1943.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Weinstein T, Scutellà F, Wang H-L, Zucchelli G. Implant placement in the esthetic area: criteria for positioning single and multiple implants. Periodontology. 2000; 2018 ( 77 ): 176 - 196.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban T, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Immediate implant placement in molar regions: risk factors for early failure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 220 - 227.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChrcanovic BR, Martins MD, Wennerberg A. Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17 ( suppl 1 ): e1 - e16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFernandes KS, Glick M, de Souza MS, Kokron CM, Gallottini M. Association between immunologic parameters, glycemic control, and postextraction complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015; 146: 592 - 599.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRa’ed M. The effect of cigarette smoking on the severity of pain, swelling and trismus after the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013; 5: e117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebster AJ, Gaitskell K, Turnbull I, Cairns BJ, Clarke R. Characterisation, identification, clustering, and classification of disease. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 5405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFillingim RB, Bruehl S, Dworkin RH, et al. The ACTTION-American pain society pain taxonomy (AAPT): an evidence-based and multidimensional approach to classifying chronic pain conditions. J Pain. 2014; 15: 241 - 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuodzbalys G, Wang HL. Soft and hard tissue assessment of immediate implant placement: a case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 237 - 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumar PR, Kher U. Shield the socket: procedure, case report and classification. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2018; 22: 266 - 272.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl-Shabeeb MS, Al-Askar M, Al-Rasheed A, et al. Alveolar bone remodeling around immediate implants placed in accordance with the extraction socket classification: a three-dimensional microcomputed tomography analysis. J Periodontol. 2012; 83: 981 - 987.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuodzbalys G, Wang H-L. Socket morphology-based treatment for implant esthetics: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25 ( 5 ): 970 – 978.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith RB, Tarnow DP. Classification of molar extraction sites for immediate dental implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: 911 - 916.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBleyan S, Gaspar J, Huwais S, et al. Molar septum expansion with osseodensification for immediate implant placement, retrospective multicenter study with up-to-5-year follow-up, introducing a new molar socket classification. J Funct Biomater. 2021; 12 ( 4 ): 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila G, Galindo-Moreno P, Soehren S, Misch CE, Morelli T, Wang HL. A novel decision-making process for tooth retention or extraction. J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 476 - 491.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarazona B, Tarazona-Alvarez P, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago M. Relationship between indication for tooth extraction and outcome of immediate implants: a retrospective study with 5 years of follow-up. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014; 6: e384 - e388.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouncil NR. Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChang L-C, Cheng Y-M. The effect of different socket types on implant therapy while using flapless ridge preservation. Appl Sci. 2021; 11: 970.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoelken R, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization after long-axis root fracture and complete loss of the facial bony lamella. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011; 31: 175 - 183.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuodzbalys G, Sakavicius D, Wang HL. Classification of extraction sockets based upon soft and hard tissue components. J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 413 - 424.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Wang HL, Ravida A, et al. Rridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples consensus report working group C. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019; 12: 399 - 416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlasser GD, Manfredini D, Goulet JP, De Laat A. Oro-facial pain and temporomandibular disorders classification systems: a critical appraisal and future directions. J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 258 - 268.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJakob R. Disease classification. In: Quah SR, ed. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2017: 332 - 337.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl-Hezaimi K, Levi P, Rudy R, Al-Jandan B, Al-Rasheed A. An extraction socket classification developed using analysis of bone type and blood supply to the buccal bone in monkeys. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011; 31: 421 - 427.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 539 - 549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27: 1171 - 1179.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27: 1147 - 1157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27: 1159 - 1170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalama H, Salama M. The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993; 13: 312 - 333.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElian N, Cho S, Froum S, Smith RB, Tarnow DP. A simplified socket classification and repair technique. Pract Proc Aesthetic Dent. 2007; 19: 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl Chaar E, Oshman S. Single-rooted extraction sockets: classification and treatment protocol. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016; 37: 537 - 541. quiz542.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardaropoli D, Nevins M, Casentini P. A clinical classification system for the treatment of postextraction sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021; 41: 227 - 232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. Clinical classification of bone defects concerning the placement of dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 147 - 155.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIyer S, Haribabu PK, Xing Y. Part II. Minimizing alveolar bone loss during and after extractions. Protocol and techniques for alveolar bone preservation. Alpha Omegan. 2014; 107: 14 - 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl Yafi F, Alchawaf B, Nelson K. What is the optimum for alveolar ridge preservation? Dent Clin N Am. 2019; 63: 399 - 418.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChu S, Sarnachiaro G, Hochman M, Tarnow D. Subclassification and clinical management of extraction sockets with labial dentoalveolar dehiscence defects. Compendium. 2015; 36: 516 - 525.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaplanis N, Lozada J, Kan J. Extraction defect: assessment, classification and management. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005; 33: 853 - 863.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim JJ, Ben Amara H, Chung I, Koo KT. Compromised extraction sockets: a new classification and prevalence involving both soft and hard tissue loss. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021; 51: 100 - 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTonetti MS, Jung RE, Avila-Ortiz G, et al. Management of the extraction socket and timing of implant placement: consensus report and clinical recommendations of group 3 of the XV European workshop in periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46: 183 - 194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontol. 2000; 2018 ( 77 ): 197 - 212.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanco J, Carral C, Argibay O, Liñares A. Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Periodontology. 2000; 2019 ( 79 ): 151 - 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology. 2000; 2017 ( 73 ): 84 - 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroenendijk E, Bronkhorst EM, Meijer GJ. Does the pre-operative buccal soft tissue level at teeth or gingival phenotype dictate the aesthetic outcome after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization? Analysis of a prospective clinical case series. Int J Implant Dent. 2021; 7: 84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeughels W, Merheb J, Quirynen M. Critical horizontal dimensions of interproximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 134 - 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrespi R, Capparé P, Crespi G, Lo Giudice G, Gastaldi G, Gherlone E. Immediate implant placement in sockets with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 20 - 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee C-T, Chuang S-K, Stoupel J. Survival analysis and other clinical outcomes of immediate implant placement in sites with periapical lesions: systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30: 268 - 278.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.