Show simple item record

Remnant Blood Quantification: Informing the Definition of Minimal Risk in Clinical Research

dc.contributor.authorGottula, Adam L.
dc.contributor.authorConstand, Sara
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorStolz, Uwe
dc.contributor.authorSalvator, Ann
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMcMullan, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-04T17:40:26Z
dc.date.available2024-04-04 13:40:25en
dc.date.available2023-04-04T17:40:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.identifier.citationGottula, Adam L.; Constand, Sara; Cabrera, Sandra; Stolz, Uwe; Salvator, Ann; Goodman, Michael; McMullan, Jason (2023). "Remnant Blood Quantification: Informing the Definition of Minimal Risk in Clinical Research." Ethics & Human Research 45(2): 35-39.
dc.identifier.issn2578-2355
dc.identifier.issn2578-2363
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176045
dc.description.abstractGuidelines from the Office for Human Research Protections regarding categories of research that institutional review boards (IRBs) may review through expedited procedures limit the volume of blood that can be obtained from research participants for minimal risk research purposes. As defined by the Common Rule, minimal risk research is research in which the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated are not greater than the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort encountered from routine clinical tests. For this study, we considered the volume of remnant blood following routine clinical tests in light of the current definition of minimal risk in research. Conducted at a single institution, this was a prospective cross-sectional study that evaluated blood draws from 122 patients. The median daily remnant blood volume was 11.6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 12.3, 15.2) ml for all patients and 12.9 (IQR: 13.1, 16.9) ml for patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Our findings regarding daily remnant blood volume suggest that the currently allowable blood-volume limits to qualify for expedited review or to qualify as not more than minimal risk research involving blood draws from nonhealthy adults are less than what patients experience in routine medical testing. These findings support permitting an increase in the allowable blood-volume limits to meet the regulatory definition of minimal risk research for obtaining expedited IRB review of studies in which blood samples will be collected.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherhuman subjects research
dc.subject.otherminimal risk determination
dc.subject.otherinstitutional review board
dc.subject.otherremnant blood volume
dc.subject.otherclinical research
dc.subject.otherexpedited review
dc.titleRemnant Blood Quantification: Informing the Definition of Minimal Risk in Clinical Research
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176045/1/eahr500160.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176045/2/eahr500160-sup-0001-S1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eahr.500160
dc.identifier.sourceEthics & Human Research
dc.identifier.citedreference“ 2018 Requirements (2018 Common Rule),” Office for Human Research Protections, accessed July 28, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/revised-common-rule-regulatory-text/index.html#46.102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDale, J. C., and S. G. Ruby, “ Specimen Collection Volumes for Laboratory Tests,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 127, no. 2 ( 2003 ): 162 – 68; Dale, J. C., and S. K. Pruett, “Phlebotomy—a Minimalist Approach,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 68, no. 3 (1993): 249-55; Lin, J. C., et al., “Phlebotomy Overdraw in the Neonatal Intensive Care Nursery,” Pediatrics 106, no. 2 (2000): doi: 10.1542/peds.106.2.e19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBranco, B. C., et al., “ The Increasing Burden of Phlebotomy in the Development of Anaemia and Need for Blood Transfusion amongst Trauma Patients,” Injury 43, no. 1 ( 2012 ): 78 – 83; Humble, R. M., H. G. Hounkponou, and M. D. Krasowski, “The ‘Rainbow’ of Extra Blood Tubes—Useful or Wasteful Practice?,” JAMA Internal Medicine 177, no. 1 (2017): 128-29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbid.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBranco et al., “ The Increasing Burden of Phlebotomy.”
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChant, C., G. Wilson, and J. O. Friedrich, “ Anemia, Transfusion, and Phlebotomy Practices in Critically Ill Patients with Prolonged ICU Length of Stay: A Cohort Study,” Critical Care 10, no. 5 ( 2006 ): doi: 10.1186/cc5054.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWisser, D., et al., “ Blood Loss from Laboratory Tests,” Clinical Chemistry 49, no. 10 ( 2003 ): doi: 10.1373/49.10.1651.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris, P. A., et al., “ Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—a Metadata-Driven Methodology and Workflow Process for Providing Translational Research Informatics Support,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42, no. 2 ( 2009 ): doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010; Harris, P. A., et al., “ The REDCap Consortium: Building an International Community of Software Platform Partners,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 95 ( 2019 ): doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBranco et al., “ The Increasing Burden of Phlebotomy ”; Dale and Ruby, “Specimen Collection Volumes for Laboratory Tests”; Lin et al., “Phlebotomy Overdraw in the Neonatal Intensive Care Nursery.”
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.