Show simple item record

Pre-doctoral dental students’ computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-related education, knowledge, attitudes and behavior: A national survey

dc.contributor.authorAlhamed, Farah J.
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Gisele F.
dc.contributor.authorBak, Sun-Yung
dc.contributor.authorKarl, Elisabeta
dc.contributor.authorInglehart, Marita R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T19:09:38Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01 15:09:37en
dc.date.available2023-05-01T19:09:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationAlhamed, Farah J.; Neiva, Gisele F.; Bak, Sun-Yung ; Karl, Elisabeta; Inglehart, Marita R. (2023). "Pre- doctoral dental students- computer- aided design/computer- aided manufacturing- related education, knowledge, attitudes and behavior: A national survey." Journal of Dental Education 87(4): 562-571.
dc.identifier.issn0022-0337
dc.identifier.issn1930-7837
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176246
dc.description.abstractObjectivesComputer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology transformed the world of restorative dentistry. The objectives were to assess pre-doctoral dental students’ CAD/CAM-related education, knowledge, attitudes, and professional behavior, and to explore the relationships between the year in dental school and these constructs.MethodsA total of 358 pre-doctoral dental students from 17 of the 68 US dental schools responded to a web-based anonymous survey.ResultsCAD/CAM-related classroom-based education was likely to happen in lectures (87.2%) and simulated exercises as part of a class (86.9%). Faculty were most likely to provide CAD/CAM instruction (87.9%), with staff (44.8%) and dental technicians (20.2%) being engaged as well. Preclinical education included video demonstrations (81.8%), demonstrations during a lecture (76.4%) or for smaller groups of students (69.2%), hands-on workshops (65.6%), and individual instruction (50.4%). Considering the digital workflow in clinics, 45.2% reported using intraoral scans. The more advanced the students were in their program, the more CAD/CAM knowledge (r = 0.27; p < 0.001) and knowledge about what can be fabricated with CAD/CAM technology they had (r = 0.25; p < 0.001). However, the student’s satisfaction with the education about CAD/CAM did not increase over the years (r = −0.04; n.s.) and remained neutral, while their attitudes became more positive the longer they were in dental school (r = 0.13; p < 0.05). Their attitudes were quite positive, with most students considering that CAD/CAM is the future of dentistry (5 = most positive: Mean = 4.34), agreeing that they enjoyed working with CAD/CAM (Mean = 4.11) and that CAD/CAM has the potential of making them a better dentist (Mean = 4.07).ConclusionsThe majority of students in the US dental schools appreciate CAD/CAM technology, consider it to be the future of dentistry, and believe it makes them better dentists. The fact that the majority is not satisfied with their classroom-based, preclinical and clinical CAD/CAM-related education should therefore be a call to action to rethink dental school curricula in this content area.
dc.publisherSage
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherCAD/CAM
dc.subject.otherdental
dc.subject.otherdental curriculum
dc.subject.otherdental computer-aided design
dc.subject.othereducation
dc.subject.othereducational technology
dc.subject.otherschools
dc.subject.otherstudents
dc.subject.othertechnology
dc.subject.othercurriculum
dc.titlePre-doctoral dental students’ computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-related education, knowledge, attitudes and behavior: A national survey
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176246/1/jdd13144.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176246/2/jdd13144_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jdd.13144
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Dental Education
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalanisamy SV, Hegde C. Awareness among dental undergraduate students regarding CAD/CAM technology—A survey report. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2019; 9 ( 02 ): 57 - 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011; 55 ( 3 ): 559 - 570.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLMT Communications. The dynamics of dentists and digital dentistry. LMTmag. 2019; 46 - 48
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMormann WH. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int. 1989; 20: 329 - 339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaroudi K, Ibraheem SN. Assessment of chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: a review of the literature. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7 ( 4 ): 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbdullah A, Muhammed F, Zheng B, Liu Y. An overview of computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in restorative dentistry. J Dent Mater Technol. 2018; 7 ( 1 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136 ( 3 ): 343 - 346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUzun G. An overview of dental CAD/CAM systems. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2008; 22 ( 1 ): 530 - 535.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann NU, Matthisson L, Ohla H, Joda T. Digital undergraduate education in dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17 ( 9 ): 3269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReifeis PE, Kirkup ML, Willis LH, Browning WD. Introducing CAD/CAM into a predoctoral dental curriculum: a case study. J Dent Educ. 2014; 78 ( 10 ): 1432 - 1441.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrownstein SA, Murad A, Hunt RJ. Implementation of new technologies in US dental school curricula. J Dent Educ. 2015; 79 ( 3 ): 259 - 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwindling FS, Deisenhofer UK, Porsche M, et al. Establishing CAD/CAM in preclinical dental education: evaluation of a hands-on module. J Dent Educ. 2015; 79 ( 10 ): 1215 - 1221.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMays KA, Levine E. Dental students’ self-assessment of operative preparations using CAD/CAM: a preliminary analysis. J Dent Educ. 2014; 78 ( 12 ): 1673 - 1680.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolgin M, Grabowski S, Elhadad S, et al. Comparison of a prepCheck-supported self-assessment concept with conventional faculty supervision in a pre-clinical simulation environment. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018; 22 ( 3 ): e522 - e529.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiang H, Staffen A, Abdulmajeed A, et al. Effectiveness of CAD/CAM technology: a self-assessment tool for preclinical waxing exercise. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021; 25 ( 1 ): 50 - 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYamakami SA, Nagai M, Chutinan S, Ohyama H. 3D Digital technology as an alternative educational tool in preclinical dentistry. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021: 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmermann M, Mörmann W, Mehl A, Hickel R. Teaching dental undergraduate students restorative CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of a new concept. Int J Comput Dent. 2019; 22 ( 3 ): 263 - 271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheba M, Comnick C, Elkerdani T, et al. Students’ perceptions and attitudes about digital dental technology is associated with their intention to use it. J Dent Educ. 2021; 85 ( 8 ): 1427 - 1434.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglas RD, Hopp CD, Augustin MA. Dental students’ preferences and performance in crown design: conventional wax-added versus CAD. J Dent Educ. 2014; 78 ( 12 ): 1663 - 1672.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann NU, Kovaltschuk I, Lenherr P, et al. Dental students’ perceptions of digital and conventional impression techniques: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Educ. 2017; 81 ( 10 ): 1227 - 1232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhmed KE, Wang T, Li KY, et al. Performance and perception of dental students using three intraoral CAD/CAM scanners for full-arch scanning. J Prosthodont Res. 2019; 63 ( 2 ): 167 - 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrager MC, Liss H. Assessment of digital workflow in predoctoral education and patient care in north american dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2020; 84 ( 3 ): 350 - 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeVellis RF. Scale Development. Sage; 1990.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage; 2003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurgess AW, McGregor DM, Mellis CM. Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2014; 89 ( 4 ): 678.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark CF, Sheinbaum JM, Tamada Y, et al. Dental students’ perceptions of digital assessment software for preclinical tooth preparation exercises. J Dent Educ. 2017; 81 ( 5 ): 597 - 603.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.