View Item 

Show simple item record

Abortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well-Being
dc.contributor.authorLantz, Paula M.
dc.contributor.authorMichelmore, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorMoniz, Michelle H.
dc.contributor.authorMmeje, Okeoma
dc.contributor.authorAxinn, William G.
dc.contributor.authorSpector-Bagdady, Kayte
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T19:09:44Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01 15:09:43en
dc.date.available2023-05-01T19:09:44Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationLantz, Paula M. ; Michelmore, Katherine ; Moniz, Michelle H. ; Mmeje, Okeoma ; Axinn, William G. ; Spector-Bagdady, Kayte (2023). "Abortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well- Being." The Milbank Quarterly 101(S1): 283-301.
dc.identifier.issn0887-378X
dc.identifier.issn1468-0009
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176249
dc.publisherGuttmacher Institute
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherabortion policy
dc.subject.otherwomen’s health
dc.subject.othersocial welfare
dc.subject.otherstate policy
dc.titleAbortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well-Being
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176249/1/milq12614.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176249/2/milq12614_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-0009.12614
dc.identifier.sourceThe Milbank Quarterly
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller S, Wherry LR, Foster DG. What happens after an abortion denial? A review of the results from the Turnaway Study. Accessed December 1, 2022. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mille/TurnawayPP.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAiken ARA, Romanova EP, Morber JR, Gomperts R. Safety and effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion provided using online telemedicine in the United States: a population based study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022; 10: 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100200
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVenator J, Fletcher J. Undue burden beyond Texas: an analysis of abortion clinic closures, births, and abortions in Wisconsin. J Policy Anal Manage. 2021; 40 ( 3 ): 774 - 813. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22263
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitute of Medicine Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes. Mortality and Acute Complications in Preterm Infants. In: Behrman RE, Butler AS, eds. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. National Academies Press; 2007. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11385/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaymond EG, Grimes DA. The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb; 119 ( 2 pt 1 ): 215 - 219. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorking together to reduce Black maternal mortality. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. April 6, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/features/maternal-mortality/index.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevenson AJ, Root L, Menken J. The maternal mortality consequences of losing abortion access. 2022. SocArXiv. Preprint online June 29, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/7g29k
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster DG, Biggs MA, Raifman S, Gipson JD, Kimport K, Rocca CH. Comparison of health, development, maternal bonding, and poverty among children born after denial of abortion vs after pregnancies subsequent to an abortion. JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172 ( 11 ): 1053 - 1060. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Ee E, Kleber R. Growing up under a shadow: key issues in research and on treatment of children born of rape. Child Abuse Rev. 2013; 22 ( 6 ): 386 - 397. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2270
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasile KC, Smith SG, Liu Y, et al. Rape-related pregnancy and association with reproductive coercion in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2018; 55 ( 6 ); 770 - 776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.028
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGisladottir A, Luque-Fernandez MA, Harlow BL, et al. Obstetric outcomes of mothers previously exposed to sexual violence. PLoS One. 2016; 11 ( 3 ): e0150726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150726
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbboud A. The impact of early fertility shocks on women’s fertility and labor market outcomes. SSRN. November 22, 2019. Accessed July 11, 2022. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3512913
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster DG, Biggs MA, Ralph L, Gerdts C, Roberts S, Glymour MM. Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108 ( 3 ): 407 - 413. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller S, Wherry LR, Foster DG. The economic consequences of being denied an abortion. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2022; 15 ( 1 ): 394 - 437. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20210159
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxinn WG, Barber JS, Thornton A. The long-term impact of parents’ childbearing decisions on children’s self-esteem. Demography. 1998; 35 ( 4 ): 435 - 443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber JS, Axinn WG, Thornton A. Unwanted childbearing, health, and mother-child relationships. J Health Soc Behav. 1999; 40 ( 3 ): 231 - 257. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676350
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber JS, East PL. Children’s experiences after the unintended birth of a sibling. Demography. 2011; 48 ( 1 ): 101 - 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-010-0011-2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGruber, J, Levine P, Staiger D. Abortion legalization and child living circumstances: Who is the “marginal child”? Q J Econ. 1999; 114 ( 1 ): 263 - 291.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBitler MP, Zavodny M. Child maltreatment, abortion availability, and economic conditions. Rev Econ Househ. 2004; 2: 119 - 141. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REHO.0000031610.36468.0e
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan JP, Jacob BA, Gross M, Perron BE, Moore A, Ferguson S. Early exposure to child maltreatment and academic outcomes. Child Maltreat. 2018; 23 ( 4 ): 365 - 375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559518786815
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichelmore KM, Dynarski SM. The gap within the gap: using longitudinal data to understand income differences in educational outcomes. AERA Open. 2017; 3 ( 1 ). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417692958
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey MJ, Dynarski SM. Gains and gaps: changing inequality in US college entry and completion. Working Paper No. 17633. National Bureau of Economic Research. December 2011. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17633
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChetty R, Grusky D, Hell M, Hendren N, Manduca R, Narang J. The fading American dream: trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science. 2017; 356 ( 6336 ): 398 - 406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4617
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChetty R, Hendren N, Jones MR, Porter SR. Race and economic opportunity in the United States: an intergenerational perspective. Q J Econ. 2020; 135 ( 2 ): 711 - 783. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz042
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 US ___ (2022).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoe v Wade, 410 US 113 (1973).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbortion in the United States. Kaiser Family Foundation. July 1, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/press-release/abortion-in-the-united-states/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSawhill IV, Welch M. The end of Roe will create more inequality of opportunity for children. Brookings. June 30, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2022/06/30/the-end-of-roe-will-create-more-inequality-of-opportunity-for-children/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnintended pregnancy and abortion worldwide. Guttmacher Institute. March 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/factsheet/fb_iaw.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTRAP laws. NARAL Pro-Choice California. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://prochoicecalifornia.org/issues/trap-laws/
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlanned Parenthood v Casey, 505 US 833, 844–845 (1992).
dc.identifier.citedreference18 Pa. C.S. § 3203. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/LI/consCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&ttl=18&div=0&chpt=32
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlanned Parenthood v Casey, 505 US 833, 873–878 (1992 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMS Code § 41-41-191 (2018).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHassan A. What to know about the Mississippi abortion law challenging Roe v. Wade. New York Times. May 6, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceState of Texas v Becerra et al, No. 5:2022cv00185 - Document 73 (N.D. Tex. 2022).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAla. Code § 26-23H-4 (2022).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris LH. Navigating loss of abortion services - a large academic medical center prepares for the overturn of Roe v. Wade. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386 ( 22 ): 2061 - 2064. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2206246
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSouth Carolina Code of Laws Unannotated § 44-41-80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Texas Heartbeat Act, Texas Senate Bill 8 (S.B. No. 8). Accessed December 1, 2022. https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/billtext/pdf/SB00008F.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith S, Becker LO. Kansas voters defeat abortion amendment in unexpected landslide, Kansas Reflector. August 2, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://kansasreflector.com/2022/08/02/kansas-voters-defeat-abortion-amendment-in-unexpected-landslide-1/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLong M. 2022 State ballot initiatives on abortion rights. Updated November 14, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/2022-state-ballot-initiatives-abortion-rights/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHubbard K. Out-of-state bans threaten to extend the reach of anti-abortion America. But some states are preparing. U.S. News and World Report. May 19, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2022-05-19/out-of-state-bans-threaten-to-extend-the-reach-of-anti-abortion-america-but-some-states-are-preparing
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitmer G. Executive Order No. 2022–4, unavailability of interstate extradition. July 13, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/MIEOG/2022/07/13/file_attachments/2210705/EO%202022-4%20-%20Interstate%20Extradition%20%28with%20signature%29.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceExamination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor. 42 US Code § 1395dd (2010).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Reinforcement of EMTALA obligations specific to patients who are pregnant or are experiencing pregnancy loss. US Department of Health and Human Services. July 11, 2022. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.cms.gov/files/document/qso-22-22-hospitals.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen DS, Donley G, Rebouché R. The new abortion battleground. Columbia Law Rev. 2023; 123 ( 1 ). Forthcoming 2023. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4032931
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiner LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374 ( 9 ): 843 - 852. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoonstra HD. Abortion in the lives of women struggling financially: why insurance coverage matters. Guttmacher Institute. June 14, 2016. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2016/07/abortion-lives-women-struggling-financially-why-insurance-coverage-matters
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSawhill I, Karpilow Q, Venator J. The impact of unintended childbearing on future generations. The Brookings Institution Center on Children and Families. September 2014. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/12_impact_unintended_childbearing_future_sawhill.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWind R. About half of U.S. abortion patients report using contraception in the month they became pregnant. Guttmacher Institute. January 11, 2018. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2018/about-half-us-abortion-patients-report-using-contraception-month-they-became
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAngrist JD, Evans WN. Schooling and labor market consequences of the 1970 state abortion reforms. NBER Working Paper 5406. National Bureau of Economic Research; January 1996. https://doi.org/10.3386/5406
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber JS, Kusunoki Y, Gatny HH, Budnick J. The dynamics of intimate partner violence and the risk of pregnancy during the transition to adulthood. Am Sociol Rev. 2018; 83 ( 5 ): 1020 - 1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418795856
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKusunoki Y, Barber JS, Gatny HH, Melendez R. Physical intimate partner violence and contraceptive behaviors among young women. J Womens Health. 2017; 27 ( 8 ): 1016 - 1025. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6246
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Understanding pregnancy resulting from rape in the United States. Accessed August 1, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/understanding-RRP-inUS.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxinn WG, Bardos ME, West BT. General population estimates of the association between college experience and the odds of forced intercourse. Soc Sci Res. 2018; 70: 131 - 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.10.006
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCommittee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Committee Opinion, Number 554. Reproductive and sexual coercion. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. February 2013. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.acog.org/-/media/project/acog/acogorg/clinical/files/committee-opinion/articles/2013/02/reproductive-and-sexual-coercion.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKortsmit K, Mandel MG, Reeves JA, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2019. MMWR Surveillance Summaries. 2021; 70 ( 9 ): 1 - 29. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/ss/pdfs/ss7009a1-H.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLantz PM. The social determinants of declining birth rates in the United States: implications for population health and public policy. Milbank Quarterly Opinion. November 10, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1599/mqop.2021.1110
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReported legal abortions by race of women who obtained abortion by the state of occurrence. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2020. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/state-indicator/abortions-by-race/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInduced abortion in the United States: September 2019 fact sheet. Guttmacher Institute. September 2019. Accessed December 1, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArey W, Lerma K, Beasley An, Harper L, Moayedi G, White K. A preview of the dangerous future of abortion bans – Texas Senate Bill 8. N Engl J Med. 2022; 387 ( 5 ): 388 - 390. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2207423
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu N, Vigod SN, Farrugia MM, Urquia ML, Ray JG. Physician procedure volume and related adverse events after surgically induced abortion: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ. 2019; 191 ( 19 ): E519 - E528. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181288
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAiken ARA, Broussard K, Johnson DM, Padron E. Motivations and experiences of people seeking medication abortion online in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018; 50 ( 4 ): 157 - 163. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12073
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
milq12614.pdf
Size:
202.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
milq12614_am.pdf
Size:
920.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.