View Item 

Show simple item record

The peri-implant mucosa color: A systematic appraisal of methods for its assessment and clinical significance
dc.contributor.authorMancini, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorBarootchi, Shayan
dc.contributor.authorThoma, Daniel S.
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ronald E.
dc.contributor.authorGallucci, German O.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.contributor.authorTavelli, Lorenzo
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T19:10:28Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01 15:10:26en
dc.date.available2023-05-01T19:10:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationMancini, Leonardo; Barootchi, Shayan; Thoma, Daniel S.; Jung, Ronald E.; Gallucci, German O.; Wang, Hom-Lay ; Tavelli, Lorenzo (2023). "The peri- implant mucosa color: A systematic appraisal of methods for its assessment and clinical significance." Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 25(2): 224-240.
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176263
dc.description.abstractBackgroundPeri-implant mucosa color (PMC) seems to be one of the main parameters affecting the esthetic outcome of implant therapy. However, more emphasis should be given to its assessment and reporting.PurposeTo describe the available evidence on methods to assess and report the color of the peri-implant mucosa (PMC) and the respective clinical relevance.Material and MethodsA comprehensive electronic and manual search was performed to identify clinical studies reporting on PMC.ResultsA total of 121 studies were included. PMC was evaluated at the time of the follow-up visit (chairside) in 45.5% studies. PMC assessment was performed qualitatively, by comparing PMC with adjacent and/or contralateral gingiva (78.6%) or quantitatively, using spectrophotometry (20.7%) or a software on clinical photographs (0.8%). The most performed method to assess PMC was through esthetic indices (76.9%), either at the time of the follow-up visit (chairside) or at later time point using photographs. Quantitative reporting of PMC included averages of points from esthetic indices or color differences to natural gingiva expressed with the CIELAB color system. PMC assessment allowed describing color discrepancies compared to natural gingiva, evaluating color changes over time, and comparing the outcomes of different treatment modalities. PMC assessment through spectrophotometry was additionally utilized to assess the role of mucosal thickness (MT) on PMC.ConclusionsVarious methods for PMC assessment and reporting were described, including visual assessment, mainly through esthetic indices, and spectrophotometry. PMC evaluation has allowed to demonstrate the factors affecting the color of the peri-implant soft tissue, such as the type of abutment/restoration, MT, and soft tissue augmentation.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otheresthetics
dc.subject.otherspectrophotometry
dc.subject.othersystematic review
dc.subject.othercolor
dc.subject.othersoft tissue
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.titleThe peri-implant mucosa color: A systematic appraisal of methods for its assessment and clinical significance
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176263/1/cid13180.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176263/2/cid13180_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.13180
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.identifier.citedreferencePohl V, Cede J, Pokorny GBM, Haas R, Pohl S. Esthetic outcomes for immediate implant placement with immediate provisionalization in the anterior maxilla with buccal dehiscence: results of a comparative pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022; 37 ( 3 ): 508 - 514.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaller T, Evci E, Hämmerle CH, Hüsler J, Jung RE, Thoma DS. Perceptibility and acceptability of color differences of single-tooth implants at the restoration and mucosa levels: an exploratory clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2020; 33 ( 5 ): 487 - 492.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang T, Wang L, Lu Q, Fan Z. Influence of anodized titanium abutments on the esthetics of the peri-implant soft tissue: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125 (3):445-452.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWanis RW, Hosny MM, ElNahass H. Clinical evaluation of the buccal aspect around immediate implant using dual zone therapeutic concept versus buccal gap fill to bone level: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022; 24 ( 3 ): 307 - 319.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinländer M, Lekovic V, Spadijer-Gostovic S, Milicic B, Wegscheider WA, Piehslinger E. Soft tissue development around abutments with a circular macro-groove in healed sites of partially edentulous posterior maxillae and mandibles: a clinical pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22 ( 7 ): 743 - 752.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWessels R, Vervaeke S, Seyssens L, Eghbali A, Cosyn J. A 5-year cohort study on early implant placement with guided bone regeneration or alveolar ridge preservation with connective tissue graft. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22 ( 6 ): 697 - 705.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWittneben JG, Gavric J, Belser UC, et al. Esthetic and clinical performance of implant-supported all-ceramic crowns made with prefabricated or CAD/CAM zirconia abutments: a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2017; 96 ( 2 ): 163 - 170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hammerle CH. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20 ( 8 ): 802 - 808.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Felice P, Mazzotti C, et al. 5-year outcomes after coverage of soft tissue dehiscence around single implants: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018; 11 ( 2 ): 215 - 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZuiderveld E, Meijer H, Vissink A, Raghoebar G. The influence of different soft-tissue grafting procedures at single implant placement on esthetics: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 ( 8 ): 903 - 914.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZuiderveld EG, Meijer HJ, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Outcome of treatment with single implants in preserved versus nonpreserved alveolar ridges: a 1-year cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34 ( 6 ): 1457 - 1465.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009; 80 ( 1 ): 140 - 151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWessels R, De Roose S, De Bruyckere T, et al. The mucosal scarring index: reliability of a new composite index for assessing scarring following oral surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23 ( 3 ): 1209 - 1215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanini M, Felice P, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Marzadori M, Zucchelli G. Esthetic evaluation and patient-centered outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77 ( 1 ): 150 - 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo A, Imber JC, Marruganti C, Salvi GE, Ramieri G, Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients with and without history of periodontitis: a 20-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2022; 49 ( 12 ): 1346 - 1356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo A, Imber JC, Lempert J, Hosseini M, Jensen SS. Narrow diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: a 1-year prospective, controlled, clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022; 33 ( 8 ): 844 - 857.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, et al. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2020; 91 ( 1 ): 9 - 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, et al. Classification of facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. J Periodontol. 2019; 90 ( 10 ): 1116 - 1124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDueled E, Gotfredsen K, Trab Damsgaard M, Hede B. Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20 ( 7 ): 729 - 736.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhmad I. Standardization for dental photography. Part 1. J Cosmetic Dent. 2020; 36 ( 2 ): 26 - 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM. A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues–the implant crown aesthetic index. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16 ( 6 ): 645 - 649.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu Y, Zhang R, Ye H, et al. The development of a 3D colour reproduction system of digital impressions with an intraoral scanner and a 3D printer: a preliminary study. Sci Rep. 2019; 9 ( 1 ): 20052.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeferm JT, Schreurs R, Baan F, et al. Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22 ( 3 ): 1303 - 1309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27 ( 3 ): 251 - 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 ( 15 ): S6 - S22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIvanovski S, Lee R. Comparison of peri-implant and periodontal marginal soft tissues in health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 76 ( 1 ): 116 - 130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. The current use of patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 ( 11 ): 45 - 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSailer I, Fehmer V, Ioannidis A, Hammerle CH, Thoma DS. Threshold value for the perception of color changes of human gingiva. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 ( 6 ): 757 - 762.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElani HW, Starr JR, Da Silva JD, Gallucci GO. Trends in dental implant use in the U.S., 1999-2016, and projections to 2026. J Dent Res. 2018; 97 ( 13 ): 1424 - 1430.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 ( 1 ): 7 - 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stahli A, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Sculean A. Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses. Periodontol 2000. 2022; 88 ( 1 ): 201 - 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Sharma P, Mounssif I. Esthetics in periodontics and implantology. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77 ( 1 ): 7 - 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, De Bruyn H. Esthetic assessments in implant dentistry: objective and subjective criteria for clinicians and patients. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 ( 1 ): 193 - 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammerle CHF, Tarnow D. The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: a narrative review. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45 ( 20 ): S267 - S277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Majzoub J, et al. Prevalence and risk indicators of midfacial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence at single site in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional clinical and ultrasonographic study. J Periodontol. 2022; 93 ( 6 ): 857 - 866.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, et al. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44 ( 2 ): 215 - 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 186 - 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang II, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33 ( 1 ): 212 - 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Muhlemann S, Jung RE. Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2014; 66 ( 1 ): 106 - 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila-Ortiz G, Gonzalez-Martin O, Couso-Queiruga E, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype. J Periodontol. 2020; 91 ( 3 ): 283 - 288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonino F, Steffensen B, Natto Z, Hur Y, Holtzman LP, Weber HP. Prospective study of the impact of peri-implant soft tissue properties on patient-reported and clinically assessed outcomes. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 ( 9 ): 1025 - 1032.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLops D, Stellini E, Sbricoli L, Cea N, Romeo E, Bressan E. Influence of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissues in anterior areas with thin gingival biotype: a multicentric prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28 ( 10 ): 1263 - 1268.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hammerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28 ( 4 ): 357 - 365.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFurhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16 ( 6 ): 639 - 644.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHof M, Umar N, Budas N, Seemann R, Pommer B, Zechner W. Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices-comparative analysis of reliability and validity. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 ( 7 ): 697 - 706.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Wang HL. Implant soft tissue dehiscence coverage esthetic score (IDES): a pilot within- and between-rater analysis of consistency in objective and subjective scores. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32: 349 - 358.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIshikawa-Nagai S, Da Silva J, Weber H, Park S. Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part II. Preferred implant neck color to improve soft tissue esthetics. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 ( 5 ): 575 - 580.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark SE, Da Silva JD, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part I. spectrophotometric assessment of natural tooth gingiva and peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 ( 5 ): 569 - 574.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenic GI, Elmasry M, Hammerle CH. Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 ( 11 ): 86 - 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenic GI, Scherrer D, Sancho-Puchades M, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH. Spectrophotometric and visual evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue color. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28 ( 2 ): 192 - 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaniz G, Bressan E, Stellini E, Romeo E, Lops D. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue color. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25 ( 8 ): 992 - 996.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGehrke P, Riekeberg U, Fackler O, Dhom G. Comparison of in vivo visual, spectrophotometric and colorimetric shade determination of teeth and implant-supported crowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2009; 12 ( 3 ): 247 - 263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane; 2021 www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
dc.identifier.citedreferencePage MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 134: 178 - 189.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162 ( 11 ): 777 - 784.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; 350: g7647.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStillwell SB, Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Williamson KM. Evidence-based practice, step by step: asking the clinical question: a key step in evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs. 2010; 110 ( 3 ): 58 - 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl-Delayme RMA. Preservation of keratinized gingiva around dental implants using a diode laser when uncovering implants for second stage surgery. Eur Oral Res. 2019; 53 ( 3 ): 106 - 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl-Dosari A, Al-Rowis R, Moslem F, Alshehri F, Ballo AM. Esthetic outcome for maxillary anterior single implants assessed by different dental specialists. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016; 8 ( 5 ): 345 - 353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson L, Dds MS, Inglehart M, et al. Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent. 2014; 23 ( 4 ): 416 - 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArora H, Ivanovski S. Correlation between pre-operative buccal bone thickness and soft tissue changes around immediately placed and restored implants in the maxillary anterior region: a 2-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28 ( 10 ): 1188 - 1194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArora H, Khzam N, Roberts D, Bruce WL, Ivanovski S. Immediate implant placement and restoration in the anterior maxilla: tissue dimensional changes after 2-5 year follow up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19 ( 4 ): 694 - 702.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtef M, El Barbary A, Dahrous MSE, Zahran AF. Comparison of the soft and hard peri-implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021; 23 ( 3 ): 456 - 465.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBittner N, Schulze-Spate U, Silva C, et al. Comparison of peri-implant soft tissue color with the use of pink-neck vs gray implants and abutments based on soft tissue thickness: a 6-month follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont. 2020; 33 ( 1 ): 29 - 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoon L, De Mars G, Favril C, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Vandamme K. Esthetic evaluation of single implant restorations, adjacent single implant restorations, and implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a 1-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22 ( 1 ): 128 - 137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorgonovo AE, Corrocher G, Dolci M, Censi R, Vavassori V, Maiorana C. Clinical evaluation of zirconium dental implants placed in esthetic areas: a case series study. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013; 8 ( 4 ): 532 - 545.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22 ( 6 ): 631 - 637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBüchi DL, Sailer I, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CH, Thoma DS. All-ceramic single-tooth implant reconstructions using modified zirconia abutments: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial of the effect of pink veneering ceramic on the esthetic outcomes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 ( 1 ): 29 - 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009; 80 ( 1 ): 152 - 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction. J Periodontol. 2011; 82 ( 3 ): 342 - 349.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanullo L, Menini M, Covani U, Pesce P. Clinical outcomes of using a prosthetic protocol to rehabilitate tissue-level implants with a convergent collar in the esthetic zone: a 3-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123 ( 2 ): 246 - 251.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCappare P, Ferrini F, Ruscica C, Pantaleo G, Tete G, Gherlone EF. Digital versus traditional workflow for immediate loading in single-implant restoration: a randomized clinical trial. Biology (Basel). 2021; 10 ( 12 ):1281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChappuis V, Rahman L, Buser R, Janner SFM, Belser UC, Buser D. Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results. J Dent Res. 2018; 97 ( 3 ): 266 - 274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChecchi V, Felice P, Zucchelli G, et al. Wide diameter immediate post-extractive implants vs delayed placement of normal-diameter implants in preserved sockets in the molar region: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10 ( 3 ): 263 - 278.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho HL, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS. Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010; 40 ( 4 ): 188 - 193.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosgarea R, Gasparik C, Dudea D, Culic B, Dannewitz B, Sculean A. Peri-implant soft tissue colour around titanium and zirconia abutments: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 ( 5 ): 537 - 544.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations: a 1-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 15 ( 6 ): 847 - 857.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Collys K, Cleymaet R, De Rouck T. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38 ( 8 ): 746 - 753.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Dierens M, De Rouck T. Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14 ( 4 ): 517 - 526.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCutrim ES, Peruzzo DC, Benatti B. Evaluation of soft tissues around single tooth implants in the anterior maxilla restored with cemented and screw-retained crowns. J Oral Implantol. 2012; 38 ( 6 ): 700 - 705.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Angelis N, Felice P, Pellegrino G, Camurati A, Gambino P, Esposito M. Guided bone regeneration with and without a bone substitute at single post-extractive implants: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011; 4 ( 4 ): 313 - 325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Bruyckere T, Cosyn J, Younes F, et al. A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to re-establish buccal convexity: one-year aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31 ( 6 ): 507 - 516.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceden Hartog L, Raghoebar GM, Slater JJ, Stellingsma K, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 15 ( 3 ): 311 - 321.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonos N, Horvath A, Calciolari E, Mardas N. Immediate provisionalization of bone level implants with a hydrophilic surface. A five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 ( 2 ): 139 - 149.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElaskary AT, Maebed MA, Cho SC, El Tantawi M. A novel method for immediate implant placement in defective fresh extraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35 ( 4 ): 799 - 807.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Barausse C, Pistilli R, et al. Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015; 8 ( 4 ): 347 - 358.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Bressan E, Grusovin MG, et al. Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10 ( 1 ): 57 - 72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Cardaropoli D, Gobbato L, et al. The role of dental implant abutment design on the aesthetic outcome: preliminary 3-month post-loading results from a multicentre split-mouth randomised controlled trial comparing two different abutment designs. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018; 11 ( 1 ): 77 - 87.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, González-García A, Peñarrocha Diago M, et al. Natural or palatal positioning of immediate post-extractive implants in the aesthetic zone? 1-year results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018; 11 ( 2 ): 189 - 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Tallarico M, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Gianserra R. Endodontic retreatment vs dental implants of teeth with an uncertain endodontic prognosis: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10 ( 3 ): 293 - 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Blasone R, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel dental implant system as single implants under immediate loading conditions - 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016; 9 ( 4 ): 367 - 379.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Zucchelli G, Cannizzaro G, et al. Immediate, immediate-delayed (6 weeks) and delayed (4 months) post-extractive single implants: 1-year post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10 ( 1 ): 11 - 26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelice P, Pistilli R, Barausse C, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Esposito M. Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015; 8 ( 4 ): 361 - 372.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelice P, Zucchelli G, Cannizzaro G, et al. Immediate, immediate-delayed (6 weeks) and delayed (4 months) post-extractive single implants: 4-month post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016; 9 ( 3 ): 233 - 247.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrari M, Carrabba M, Vichi A, Goracci C, Cagidiaco MC. Influence of abutment color and mucosal thickness on soft tissue color. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32 ( 2 ): 393 - 399.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Khouly I, Tarnow DP, et al. The use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix at the time of implant placement to increase the volume of buccal soft tissue. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015; 35 ( 2 ): 179 - 189.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFügl A, Zechner W, Pozzi A, et al. An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21 ( 6 ): 2133 - 2142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFürhauser R, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Busenlechner D, Watzek G, Pommer B. Esthetics of flapless single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla using guided surgery: association of three-dimensional accuracy and pink esthetic score. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17 ( 2 ): e427 - e433.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFürhauser R, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Busenlechner D, Watzek G, Pommer B. Immediate restoration of immediate implants in the esthetic zone of the maxilla via the copy-abutment technique: 5-year follow-up of pink esthetic scores. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19 ( 1 ): 28 - 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFurze D, Byrne A, Alam S, Brägger U, Wismeijer D, Wittneben JG. Influence of the fixed implant-supported provisional phase on the esthetic final outcome of implant-supported crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21 ( 4 ): 649 - 655.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallucci GO, Grütter L, Nedir R, Bischof M, Belser UC. Esthetic outcomes with porcelain-fused-to-ceramic and all-ceramic single-implant crowns: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22 ( 1 ): 62 - 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcia-Sanchez R, Mardas N, Buti J, Ortiz Ruiz AJ, Pardo ZG. Immediate implant placement in fresh alveolar sockets with a minimal split-thickness envelope flap: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32 ( 9 ): 1115 - 1126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGehrke P, Degidi M, Lulay-Saad Z, Dhom G. Reproducibility of the implant crown aesthetic index–rating aesthetics of single-implant crowns and adjacent soft tissues with regard to observer dental specialization. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 11 ( 3 ): 201 - 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGehrke P, Lobert M, Dhom G. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score–rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008; 20 ( 6 ): 375 - 384. Discussion 385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil MS, Ishikawa-Nagai S, Elani HW, et al. A prospective clinical trial to assess the optical efficacy of pink neck implants and pink abutments on soft tissue esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29 ( 6 ): 409 - 415.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGil MS, Ishikawa-Nagai S, Elani HW, et al. Comparison of the color appearance of peri-implant soft tissue with natural gingiva using anodized pink-neck implants and pink abutments: a prospective clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34 ( 3 ): 752 - 758.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroenendijk E, Staas TA, Bronkhorst E, Raghoebar GM, Meijer GJ. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization: aesthetic outcome 1 year after implant placement. A prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22 ( 2 ): 193 - 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGu YX, Shi JY, Zhuang LF, Qiao SC, Xu YY, Lai HC. Esthetic outcome and alterations of soft tissue around single implant crowns: a 2-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 ( 8 ): 909 - 914.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGualini F, Salina S, Rigotti F, et al. Subcrestal placement of dental implants with an internal conical connection of 0.5 mm versus 1.5 mm: outcome of a multicentre randomised controlled trial 1 year after loading. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10 ( 1 ): 73 - 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHappe A, Schmidt A, Neugebauer J. Peri-implant soft-tissue esthetic outcome after immediate implant placement in conjunction with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix or connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022; 34 ( 1 ): 215 - 225.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartlev J, Kohberg P, Ahlmann S, Andersen NT, Schou S, Isidor F. Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25 ( 11 ): 1245 - 1250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHof M, Pommer B, Strbac GD, Sütö D, Watzek G, Zechner W. Esthetic evaluation of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla following autologous bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 88 - 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosseini M, Gotfredsen K. A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 ( 4 ): 453 - 458.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosseini M, Worsaae N, Gotfredsen K. Tissue changes at implant sites in the anterior maxilla with and without connective tissue grafting: a five-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31 ( 1 ): 18 - 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosseini M, Worsaae N, Schiodt M, Gotfredsen K. A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011; 4 ( 4 ): 347 - 361.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosseini M, Worsaae N, Schiodt M, Gotfredsen K. A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 ( 10 ): 1078 - 1087.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang JP, Liu JM, Wu YM, et al. Clinical evaluation of xenogeneic collagen matrix versus free gingival grafts for keratinized mucosa augmentation around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021; 48: 1293 - 1301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones AR, Martin W. Comparing pink and white esthetic scores to layperson perception in the single-tooth implant patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 ( 6 ): 1348 - 1353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonker BP, Wolvius EB, van der Tas J, Pijpe J. The effect of resorbable membranes on 1-stage ridge augmentation in anterior single-tooth replacement: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 ( 9 ): e27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYao JW, Wang HL. Assessment of peri-implant soft tissue adaptive pressure and time after provisional restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019; 39 ( 6 ): 809 - 815.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonker BP, Wolvius EB, van der Tas JT, Tahmaseb A, Pijpe J. Esthetics and patient-reported outcomes of implants placed with guided bone regeneration and complete native bone: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35 ( 2 ): 406 - 414.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJun SH, Ahn JS, Chang BM, Lee JD, Ryu JJ, Kwon JJ. In vivo measurements of human gingival translucency parameters. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33 ( 4 ): 427 - 434.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuodzbalys G, Wang HL. Soft and hard tissue assessment of immediate implant placement: a case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18 ( 2 ): 237 - 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuodzbalys G, Wang HL. Esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations. J Periodontol. 2010; 81 ( 1 ): 34 - 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolinski M, Hess P, Leziy S, et al. Immediate provisionalization in the esthetic zone: 1-year interim results from a prospective single-cohort multicenter study evaluating 3.0-mm-diameter tapered implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22 ( 6 ): 2299 - 2308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKonstantinidis IK, Siormpas KD, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Mitsias ME, Kotsakis GA. Long-term esthetic evaluation of the roll flap technique in the implant rehabilitation of patients with agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors: 10-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31 ( 4 ): 820 - 826.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunavisarut C, Buranajanyakul L, Kitisubkanchana J, Pumpaluk P. A pilot study of small-diameter one-piece ceramic implants placed in anterior regions: clinical and esthetic outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35 ( 5 ): 965 - 973.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLai HC, Zhang ZY, Wang F, Zhuang LF, Liu X, Pu YP. Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in the anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19 ( 6 ): 560 - 564.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi X, Wu B, Cheng X, Li Y, Xie X, Deng F. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: the implant restoration esthetic index and patient perception. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28 ( 1 ): e51 - e58.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorenzo R, Garcia V, Orsini M, Martin C, Sanz M. Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 ( 3 ): 316 - 324.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMangano C, Levrini L, Mangano A, Mangano F, Macchi A, Caprioglio A. Esthetic evaluation of implants placed after orthodontic treatment in patients with congenitally missing lateral incisors. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014; 26 ( 1 ): 61 - 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarconcini S, Giammarinaro E, Derchi G, Alfonsi F, Covani U, Barone A. Clinical outcomes of implants placed in ridge-preserved versus nonpreserved sites: a 4-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20 ( 6 ): 906 - 914.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartinez-Rus F, Prieto M, Salido MP, Madrigal C, Ozcan M, Pradies G. A clinical study assessing the influence of anodized titanium and zirconium dioxide abutments and peri-implant soft tissue thickness on the optical outcome of implant-supported lithium disilicate single crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32 ( 1 ): 156 - 163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMau JL, Grodin E, Lin JJ, Chen MC, Ho CH, Cochran D. A comparative, randomized, prospective, two-center clinical study to evaluate the clinical and esthetic outcomes of two different bone grafting techniques in early implant placement. J Periodontol. 2019; 90 ( 3 ): 247 - 255.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeijndert CM, Raghoebar GM, Santing HJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Performance of bone-level implants with conical connections in the anterior maxilla: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31 ( 2 ): 173 - 180.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNissen KJ, Starch-Jensen T. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft from the ascending mandibular ramus. Implant Dent. 2019; 28 ( 1 ): 46 - 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoelken R, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization after long-axis root fracture and complete loss of the facial bony lamella. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011; 31 ( 2 ): 175 - 183.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoelken R, Moergel M, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Immediate and flapless implant insertion and provisionalization using autogenous bone grafts in the esthetic zone: 5-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 ( 3 ): 320 - 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoelken R, Neffe BA, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Maintenance of marginal bone support and soft tissue esthetics at immediately provisionalized OsseoSpeed implants placed into extraction sites: 2-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25 ( 2 ): 214 - 220.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoelken R, Oberhansl F, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Immediately provisionalized OsseoSpeed(™) profile implants inserted into extraction sockets: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27 ( 6 ): 744 - 749.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceÖstman PO, Chu SJ, Drago C, Saito H, Nevins M. Clinical outcomes of maxillary anterior postextraction socket implants with immediate provisional restorations using a novel macro-hybrid implant design: an 18- to 24-month single-cohort prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020; 40 ( 3 ): 355 - 363.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeng M, Zhao WJ, Hosseini M, Zhou WJ, Xiao T, Chuan JL. Influence of restorative materials on color of implant-supported single crowns in esthetic zone: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 5034358.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Esthetic outcome and tissue stability of maxillary anterior single-tooth implants following reconstruction with mandibular block grafts: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28 ( 1 ): 270 - 280.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePieri F, Siroli L, Forlivesi C, Corinaldesi G. Clinical, esthetic, and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.0-mm) implants supporting single crowns in the anterior region: a 3-year prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 ( 6 ): 825 - 832.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollini A, Morton D, Arunyanak SP, Harris BT, Lin WS. Evaluation of esthetic parameters related to a single implant restoration by laypeople and dentists. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124 ( 1 ): 94 - 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrati C, Zamparini F, Canullo L, Pirani C, Botticelli D, Gandolfi MG. Factors affecting soft and hard tissues around two-piece transmucosal implants: a 3-year prospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35 ( 5 ): 1022 - 1036.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuisys A, Auzbikaviciute V, Vindasiute-Narbute E, Pranskunas M, Razukevicus D, Linkevicius T. Immediate implant placement vs. early implant treatment in the esthetic area. A 1-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022; 33 ( 6 ): 634 - 655.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuisys A, Deikuviene J, Vindasiute-Narbute E, Razukevicus D, Zvirblis T, Linkevicius T. Connective tissue graft vs porcine collagen matrix after immediate implant placement in esthetic area: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022; 24 ( 2 ): 141 - 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaes F, Cosyn J, Crommelinck E, Coessens P, De Bruyn H. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38 ( 4 ): 385 - 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRieder D, Eggert J, Krafft T, Weber HP, Wichmann MG, Heckmann SM. Impact of placement and restoration timing on single-implant esthetic outcome - a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27 ( 2 ): e80 - e86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Hämmerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20 ( 3 ): 219 - 225.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSun C, Zhao J, Liu Z, et al. Comparing conventional flap-less immediate implantation and socket-shield technique for esthetic and clinical outcomes: a randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31 ( 2 ): 181 - 191.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Brandenberg F, Fehmer V, Knechtle N, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. The esthetic effect of veneered zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant reconstructions: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 18 ( 6 ): 1210 - 1217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Gamper FB, Sapata VM, Voce G, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Spectrophotometric analysis of fluorescent zirconia abutments compared to "conventional" zirconia abutments: a within subject controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19 ( 4 ): 760 - 766.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUrban IA, Wessing B, Alández N, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial using a novel collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: outcome at prosthetic delivery and at 1-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 ( 6 ): 487 - 497.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Nimwegen WG, Raghoebar GM, Zuiderveld EG, Jung RE, Meijer HJA, Mühlemann S. Immediate placement and provisionalization of implants in the aesthetic zone with or without a connective tissue graft: a 1-year randomized controlled trial and volumetric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 ( 7 ): 671 - 678.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVaroni EM, Moltrasio G, Gargano M, Ludwig N, Lodi G, Scaringi R. Color analysis of periimplant soft tissues focusing on implant system: a case series. Implant Dent. 2017; 26 ( 2 ): 217 - 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVellis J, Dmd MS, Kutkut A, Dds MS, Al-Sabbagh M, Dds MS. Comparison of xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. free gingival grafts to increase the zone of keratinized mucosa around functioning implants. Implant Dent. 2019; 28 ( 1 ): 20 - 27.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cid13180.pdf
Size:
2.175MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cid13180_am.pdf
Size:
1.198MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.