Show simple item record

Current landscape of kidney allocation: Organ procurement organization perspectives

dc.contributor.authorConcepcion, Beatrice P.
dc.contributor.authorHarhay, Meera
dc.contributor.authorRuterbories, Jay
dc.contributor.authorFinn, Jan
dc.contributor.authorWiseman, Alex
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Sumit
dc.contributor.authorDoshi, Mona D.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T19:10:47Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01 15:10:45en
dc.date.available2023-05-01T19:10:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationConcepcion, Beatrice P.; Harhay, Meera; Ruterbories, Jay; Finn, Jan; Wiseman, Alex; Cooper, Matthew; Mohan, Sumit; Doshi, Mona D. (2023). "Current landscape of kidney allocation: Organ procurement organization perspectives." Clinical Transplantation 37(4): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn0902-0063
dc.identifier.issn1399-0012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176272
dc.description.abstractOrgan procurement organizations (OPOs) play a central role in the recovery, preservation, and distribution of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation in the United States. We conducted a national survey to gather information on OPO practices and perceived barriers to efficient organ placement in the face of the new circle-based allocation and asked for suggestions to overcome them. Of the 57 OPOs, 44 responded (77%). The majority of OPOs (61%) reported barriers to obtaining a kidney biopsy, including lack of an available pathologist. Most OPOs (55%) indicated barriers to pumping owing to a lack of available staff and transportation. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the new allocation system has worsened transportation challenges (85%), increased provisional acceptances of kidneys (66%), increased communication challenges with transplant centers (68%), and worsened the efficiency of organ allocation (83%). OPO-suggested solutions include making transplant centers more accountable for inefficient selection practices, developing reliable transportation options, and removing the requirement for national sharing. These findings underscore the need to examine closely the trade-offs of the new allocation system with respect to costs, organ ischemia, and discard. These findings may help inform practice and policy for overcoming transportation barriers and improving the efficiency of organ placement.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbarriers
dc.subject.otherorgan procurement organizations
dc.subject.otherorgan allocation
dc.subject.otherdeceased donor kidneys
dc.titleCurrent landscape of kidney allocation: Organ procurement organization perspectives
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176272/1/ctr14925-sup-0004-TableS1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176272/2/ctr14925_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176272/3/ctr14925.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ctr.14925
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Transplantation
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHusain SA, King KL, Batal I, et al. Reproducibility of deceased donor kidney procurement biopsies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020; 15 ( 2 ): 257 - 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited Network for Organ Sharing. Making kidney and pancreas distribution more fair and equitable. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://unos.org/policy/improving-access-for-kidney-and-pancreas-allocation/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler JT, Husain SA, King KL, Mohan S. Greater complexity and monitoring of the new Kidney Allocation System: implications and unintended consequences of concentric circle kidney allocation on network complexity. Am J Transplant. 2021; 21 ( 6 ): 2007 - 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohan VS, Pilch N, McGillicuddy J, et al. Early assessment of National Kidney Allocation Policy Change. J Am Coll Surg. 2022; 234 ( 4 ): 565 - 570.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmmons BR, Husain SA, King KL, Adler JT, Mohan S. Variations in deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy practice patterns: a survey of U.S. organ procurement organizations. Clin Transplant. 2021; 35 ( 9 ): e14411.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42 ( 2 ): 377 - 381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) Reports. Accessed January 22, 2022. https://www.srtr.org/reports/opo-specific-reports/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing KL, Husain SA, Perotte A, Adler JT, Schold JD, Mohan S. Deceased donor kidneys allocated out of sequence by organ procurement organizations. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 ( 5 ): 1372 - 1381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network. Eliminate use of DSA and region from kidney allocation one year post-implementation monitoring report. Published July 1, 2022. Accessed November 10, 2022. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/p2oc3ada/data_report_kidney_full_20220624_1.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAubert O, Reese PP, Audry B, et al. Disparities in acceptance of deceased donor kidneys between the United States and France and estimated effects of increased US acceptance. JAMA Intern Med. 2019; 179 ( 10 ): 1365 - 1374.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynch RJ, Doby BL, Goldberg DS, Lee KJ, Cimeno A, Karp SJ. Procurement characteristics of high- and low-performing OPOs as seen in OPTN/SRTR data. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 ( 2 ): 455 - 463.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgan Procurement Organizations Conditions for Coverage: Revisions to Outcome Measure Requirements for Organ Procurement Organizations. In: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services HaHS eFV. In. 86 ed.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoby BL, Ross-Driscoll K, Yu S, Godwin M, Lee KJ, Lynch RJ. Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 ( 6 ): 1614 - 1623.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing KL, Husain SA, Schold JD, et al. Major variation across local transplant centers in probability of kidney transplant for wait-listed patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020; 31 ( 12 ): 2900 - 2911.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrennan C, Husain SA, King KL, et al. A donor utilization index to assess the utilization and discard of deceased donor kidneys perceived as high risk. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019; 14 ( 11 ): 1634 - 1641.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaronzik-Wang JM, James NT, Weatherspoon KC, et al. The aggressive phenotype: center-level patterns in the utilization of suboptimal kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12 ( 2 ): 400 - 408.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Establish minimum kidney donor criteria to require biopsy. Accessed March 27, 2022. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/policies-bylaws/public-comment/establish-minimum-kidney-donor-criteria-to-require-biopsy/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReese PP, Aubert O, Naesens M, et al. Assessment of the utility of kidney histology as a basis for discarding organs in the United States: a comparison of international transplant practices and outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32 ( 2 ): 397 - 409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall IE, Parikh CR, Schroppel B, et al. Procurement biopsy findings versus kidney donor risk index for predicting renal allograft survival. Transplant Direct. 2018; 4 ( 8 ): e373.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMansour SG, Hall IE, Reese PP, et al. Reliability of deceased-donor procurement kidney biopsy images uploaded in United Network for Organ Sharing. Clin Transplant. 2018; 32 ( 12 ): e13441.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter DJ, Chiles MC, Verna EC, et al. Deceased brain dead donor liver transplantation and utilization in the United States: nighttime and weekend effects. Transplantation. 2019; 103 ( 7 ): 1392 - 1404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohan S, Foley K, Chiles MC, et al. The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney Int. 2016; 90 ( 1 ): 157 - 163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing KL, Husain SA, Cohen DJ, Schold JD, Mohan S. The role of bypass filters in deceased donor kidney allocation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22 ( 6 ): 1593 - 1602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Standardize kidney biopsy reporting and data collection. Accessed March 27, 2022. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/policies-bylaws/public-comment/standardize-kidney-biopsy-reporting-and-data-collection/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network. Continuous distribution of kidneys and pancreata concept paper. Published 2021. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/4776/continuous_distribution_of_kidneys_and-pancreata_concept_paper.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network. Update on continuous distribution of kidneys and pancreata. Published 2022. Accessed November 12, 2022. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/ha2mpuor/continuous-distribution-of-kidneys-and-pancreata_comm-update_summer-2022.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalvalaggio PR. Geographic disparities in transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021; 26 ( 5 ): 547 - 553.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhou S, Massie AB, Luo X, et al. Geographic disparity in kidney transplantation under KAS. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18 ( 6 ): 1415 - 1423.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohan S, Chiles MC, Patzer RE, et al. Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Kidney Int. 2018; 94 ( 1 ): 187 - 198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHippen BE, Reed AI, Ketchersid T, Maddux FW. Implications of the Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative for kidney transplant centers. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 ( 5 ): 1244 - 1250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) Conditions for Coverage Final Rule: Revisions to Outcome Measures for OPOs CMS-3380-F. Published 2020. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/organ-procurement-organization-opo-conditions-coverage-final-rule-revisions-outcome-measures-opos
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.