View Item 

Show simple item record

Women’s Birth Beliefs During Pregnancy and Postpartum in the Netherlands: A Quantitative Cross-Sectional Study
dc.contributor.authorVogels-Broeke, Maaike
dc.contributor.authorDaemers, Darie
dc.contributor.authorBudé, Luc
dc.contributor.authorVries, Raymond
dc.contributor.authorNieuwenhuijze, Marianne
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T19:11:36Z
dc.date.available2024-04-01 15:11:34en
dc.date.available2023-05-01T19:11:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.identifier.citationVogels-Broeke, Maaike ; Daemers, Darie; Budé, Luc ; Vries, Raymond; Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne (2023). "Women’s Birth Beliefs During Pregnancy and Postpartum in the Netherlands: A Quantitative Cross- Sectional Study." Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 68(2): 210-220.
dc.identifier.issn1526-9523
dc.identifier.issn1542-2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176294
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherpregnancy
dc.subject.othernatural childbirth
dc.subject.otherlife change events
dc.subject.otherattitude
dc.titleWomen’s Birth Beliefs During Pregnancy and Postpartum in the Netherlands: A Quantitative Cross-Sectional Study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursing
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176294/1/jmwh13473_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176294/2/jmwh13473.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jmwh.13473
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Midwifery & Women’s Health
dc.identifier.citedreferencePazandeh F, Potrata B, Huss R, Hirst J, House A. Women’s experiences of routine care during labour and childbirth and the influence of medicalisation: a qualitative study from Iran. Midwifery. 2017; 53: 63 - 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014; 30 ( 6 ): 610 - 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmmens B, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) [published online November 18, 2021]. J Reprod Infant Psychol. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2021.1979200
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeneral maternity care population in the Netherlands in 2019: Perined 2020. Accessed October 15, 2021. https://www.peristat.nl/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeneral Dutch population between 25-45 years. Centraal Bureau voor de statistiek. CBS statline womens level of education between 25-45 years. Accessed October 18th, 2021. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82275NED/table?ts=1603349366197
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlp Yilmaz F, Durgun Ozan Y. Women’s birth beliefs and associated factors in an obstetrics clinic in the Southeastern Anatolian Region of Turkey. J Health Res. 2020; 34 ( 4 ): 345 - 351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLennon SL. Risk perception in pregnancy: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2016; 72 ( 9 ): 2016 - 2029.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEyi EGY, Mollamahmutoglu L. An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34 ( 16 ): 2682 - 2692.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgenstern-Leissner O. Hospital birth, military service, and the ties that bind them: the case of Israel. Nashim J Jewish Womens Stud Gender Issues. 2006; 12 ( 1 ): 203 - 241.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClesse C, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, de Lavergne S, Hamlin S, Scheffler M. The evolution of birth medicalisation: a systematic review. Midwifery. 2018; 66: 161 - 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolopainen A, Stramrood C, van Pampus MG, Hollander M, Schuengel C. Subsequent childbirth after previous traumatic birth experience: women’s choices and evaluations. Br J Midwifery. 2020; 28 ( 8 ): 488 - 496.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKringeland T, Daltveit AK, Møller A. What characterizes women who want to give birth as naturally as possible without painkillers or intervention? Sex Reprod Healthc. 2010; 1 ( 1 ): 21 - 26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarkin P, Begley CM, Devane D. Women’s experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery. 2009; 25 ( 2 ): e49 - e59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarthus-Niegel S, von Soest T, Vollrath ME, Eberhard-Gran M. The impact of subjective birth experiences on post-traumatic stress symptoms: a longitudinal study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2013; 16 ( 1 ): 1 - 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStørksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M. The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013; 92 ( 3 ): 318 - 324.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReime B, Klein MC, Kelly A, et al. Do maternity care provider groups have different attitudes towards birth? BJOG. 2004; 111 ( 12 ): 1388 - 1393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee S, Ayers S, Holden D. How women with high risk pregnancies perceive interactions with healthcare professionals when discussing place of birth: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2016; 38: 42 - 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvery MD, Neerland CE, Saftner MA. Women’s perceptions of prenatal influences on maternal confidence for physiologic birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019; 64 ( 2 ): 201 - 208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaftner MA, Neerland C, Avery MD. Enhancing women’s confidence for physiologic birth: maternity care providers’ perspectives. Midwifery. 2017; 53: 28 - 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacdonald M. Gender expectations: natural bodies and natural births in the new midwifery in Canada. Med Anthropol Q. 2006; 20 ( 2 ): 235 - 256.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreis H, Benyamini Y, Pardo J, Peled Y. Changes in the basic birth beliefs following the first birth experience: self-fulfilling prophecies? PLoS One. 2018; 13 ( 11 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBibeau AM. Interventions during labor and birth in the United States: a qualitative analysis of women’s experiences. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014; 5 ( 4 ): 167 - 173.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Vries R, Low LK, Bogdan-Lovis E. Choosing surgical birth: desire and the nature of bioethical advice. In: Lindemann H, Verkerk M, Walker MU, eds. Naturalized Bioethics: Toward Responsible Knowing and Practice. Cambridge University Press; 2008: 42 - 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenyamini Y, Molcho ML, Dan U, Gozlan M, Preis H. Women’s attitudes towards the medicalization of childbirth and their associations with planned and actual modes of birth. Women Birth. 2017; 30 ( 5 ): 424 - 430.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFenwick J, Hauck Y, Downie J, Butt J. The childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Western Australian women. Midwifery. 2005; 21 ( 1 ): 23 - 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMansfield B. The social nature of natural childbirth. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66 ( 5 ): 1084 - 1094.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreis H, Gozlan M, Dan U, Benyamini Y. A quantitative investigation into women’s basic beliefs about birth and planned birth choices. Midwifery. 2018; 63: 46 - 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrubaker SJ, Dillaway HE. Medicalization, natural childbirth and birthing experiences. Sociol Compass. 2009; 3 ( 1 ): 31 - 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreis H, Chen R, Eisner M, et al. Testing a biopsychosocial model of the basic birth beliefs. Birth. 2017; 45 ( 1 ): 79 - 87.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson K, Sirois F. Birth attendant choice and satisfaction with antenatal care: the role of birth philosophy, relational style, and health self-efficacy. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2010; 28 ( 1 ): 69 - 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaines H, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, Hildingsson I. Women’s attitudes and beliefs of childbirth and association with birth preference: a comparison of a Swedish and an Australian sample in mid-pregnancy. Midwifery. 2012; 28 ( 6 ): e850 - e856.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen JM, Baston HA. Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study. Birth. 2007; 34 ( 1 ): 6 - 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohanson R, Newburn M, MacFarlane A. Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far? BMJ. 2002; 324 ( 7342 ): 892 - 895.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParry DC. “We wanted a birth experience, not a medical experience”: exploring Canadian women’s use of midwifery. Health Care Women Int. 2008; 29 ( 8 ): 784 - 806.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreis H, Eisner M, Chen R, Benyamini Y. First-time mothers’ birth beliefs, preferences, and actual birth: a longitudinal observational study. Women Birth. 2019; 32 ( 1 ): e110 - e117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoxon K, Sandall J, Fulop NJ. To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health Risk Soc. 2014; 16 ( 1 ): 51 - 67.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLogsdon K, Smith-Morris C. An ethnography on perceptions of pain in Dutch “natural” childbirth. Midwifery. 2017; 55: 67 - 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeerland CE. Maternal confidence for physiologic childbirth: a concept analysis. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018; 63 ( 4 ): 425 - 435.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatling C, Dahlen H, Homer CSE. The influences on women who choose publicly-funded home birth in Australia. Midwifery. 2014; 30 ( 7 ): 892 - 898.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristiaens W, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, de Vries R. Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013; 29 ( 1 ): 1 - 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWassen MMLH, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Scheepers HCJ, Smits LJM, Nijhuis JG, Roumen FJME. Epidural analgesia and operative delivery: a ten-year population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 183: 125 - 131.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvers ACC, Brouwers HAA, Hukkelhoven CWPM, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010; 341 ( 7780 ): 981.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohangoo AD, Buitendijk SE, Hukkelhoven CW, et al. Hoge perinatale sterfte in Nederland vergeleken met andere Europese landen: de Peristat-II-studie. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008; 152 ( 50 ): 2718 - 2727.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Jonge A, Baron R, Westerneng M, Twisk J, Hutton EK. Perinatal mortality rate in the Netherlands compared to other European countries: a secondary analysis of Euro-PERISTAT data. Midwifery. 2013; 29 ( 8 ): 1011 - 1018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiegerinck MMJ, van der Goes BY, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal mortality in primary midwife-led and secondary obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study. Midwifery. 2015; 31 ( 12 ): 1168 - 1176.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuca A, Cash M, Hundley V, Cheyne H, van Tijlingen E, Angell C. “Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016; 16: 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson SM, Low LK, Budé L, de Vries R, Nieuwenhuijze M. Evaluating the effect of an educational intervention on student midwife self-efficacy for their role as physiological childbirth advocates. Nurse Educ Today. 2021; 96: 104628.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLöwe B, Wahl I, Rose M, et al. A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2010; 122 ( 1 ): 86 - 95.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jmwh13473_am.pdf
Size:
1.240MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jmwh13473.pdf
Size:
420.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.