View Item 

Show simple item record

Peri-implantitis: A bibliometric network analysis of top 100 most-cited research articles
dc.contributor.authorSabri, Hamoun
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T19:11:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01 15:11:52en
dc.date.available2023-05-01T19:11:54Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationSabri, Hamoun; Wang, Hom-Lay (2023). "Peri- implantitis: A bibliometric network analysis of top 100 most- cited research articles." Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 25(2): 284-302.
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176302
dc.description.abstractBackgroundOver the past decades, there has been an increase in research publications focusing on peri-implantitis. When facing limited healthcare resources, bibliometric analyses can guide researchers and funding parties toward areas where reallocation or more focus on research activity is warranted. The main objective of this study was to identify the trends of the top 100 cited articles on peri-implantitis research as the first study of its kind.MethodsA Web of Science search, using the keywords “peri-implantitis or periimplantitis” was built to create a database of the most-cited articles. Articles were ranked by citation count and screened by two independent reviewers. The bibliometric characteristics of the studies were gathered and analyzed using several bibliometric software. Author collaborations, author clusters, and keyword co-occurrence network analyses were also performed. The correlation between the citation count and the age of each article was tested.ResultsThe top 100 cited papers were published from 1994 to 2018 and the total citation counts ranged from 119 to 972 with 244.5 citations/paper on average. There was no correlation between the age of the articles and the citation count (p-value = 0.67). 21% of the studies consisted of prospective clinical studies. 35% of the papers focused on treatment and prevention of peri-implantitis while 65% concerned epidemiology. The top three most prolific countries were Sweden (n = 31), Germany (n = 15), and Switzerland (n = 13). We found 12 authors who had greater than five publications on the list. Also, the most published journal was Clinical Oral Implants Research.ConclusionThis study provides insight into the characteristics and quality of the most highly cited peri-implantitis literature. This revealed a deficiency in terms of the number of studies on treatment strategies as well as a higher level of evidence studies among the most- impactful papers on peri-implantitis at the moment.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.subject.otherperi-implantitis
dc.subject.otherweb of science
dc.subject.otherbibliometrics
dc.subject.otherbibliometric analysis
dc.titlePeri-implantitis: A bibliometric network analysis of top 100 most-cited research articles
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176302/1/cid13177.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176302/2/cid13177_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.13177
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.identifier.citedreferencePena-Cristóbal M, Diniz-Freitas M, Monteiro L, Diz Dios P, Warnakulasuriya S. The 100 most cited articles on oral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018; 47 ( 4 ): 333 - 344. doi: 10.1111/jop.12686
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatil SS, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, et al. A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020; 30 ( 5 ): 527 - 535. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12641
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAntonio Alarcon M, Esparza D, Montoya C, Monje A, Faggion CM Jr. The 300 most-cited articles in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32 ( 1 ): e1 - e8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarazona B, Vidal-Infer A, Alonso-Arroyo A. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in implantology (2009-2013). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28 ( 7 ): 864 - 870. doi: 10.1111/clr.12891
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlonso-Arroyo A, Tarazona-Alvarez B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Vidal-Infer A. The funding sources of implantology research in the period 2008-2017: a bibliometric analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21 ( 4 ): 708 - 714. doi: 10.1111/cid.12810
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarazona-Álvarez B, López-Roldan A, Vidal-Infer A, López-Padilla D, Alonso-Arroyo A. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production of literature on peri-implant diseases in the web of science. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021; 23 ( 4 ): 625 - 634. doi: 10.1111/cid.13024
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021; 133: 285 - 296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBridget C. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations Bridget. Acad Med. 2014; 89: 1245 - 1251.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirkle C, Pendlebury DA, Schnell J, Adams J. Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Sci Stud. 2020; 1 ( 1 ): 363 - 376.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindhe J, Meyle J. Periodontology GDotEWo. Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 282 - 285.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorusso F, Noumbissi S, Francesco I, Rapone B, Khater AGA, Scarano A. Scientific trends in clinical research on zirconia dental implants: a bibliometric review. Materials. 2020; 13 ( 23 ), 5534. doi: 10.3390/ma13235534
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiang H-S, Huang R-Y, Weng P-W, et al. Prominence of scientific publications towards peri-implant complications in implantology: a bibliometric analysis using the H-classics method. J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45 ( 3 ): 240 - 249. doi: 10.1111/joor.12606
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFardi A, Kodonas K, Lillis T, Veis A. Top-cited articles in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32 ( 3 ): 555 - 564.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang NP, Berglundh T, Periodontology WGotSEWo. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?—consensus of the seventh European workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38: 178 - 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu Y-Y, Cao H-H, Kang N, Gong P, Ou G-M. Expression of cellular fibronectin mRNA in adult periodontitis and peri-implantitis: a real-time polymerase chain reaction study. Int J Oral Sci. 2013; 5 ( 4 ): 212 - 216. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2013.65
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShi S, Gao Y, Sun Y, et al. The top-100 cited articles on biomarkers in the depression field: a bibliometric analysis. Psychol Health Med. 2021; 26 ( 5 ): 533 - 542.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Hirsch J-M, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998; 106 ( 3 ): 721 - 764.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998; 106 ( 1 ): 527 - 551.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 286 - 291.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions–Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45 Suppl 20: S1 - S8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12935
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 292 - 304.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuirynen M, De Soete M, Van Steenberghe D. Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13 ( 1 ): 1 - 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89: S313 - S318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRakic M, Galindo-Moreno P, Monje A, et al. How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22 ( 4 ): 1805 - 1816.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45: S246 - S266.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42: S158 - S171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMombelli A, Müller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 67 - 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo M, Mirra D, Pittoni D, Ramieri G, Roccuzzo A. Reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis infrabony defects of various configurations: 5-year survival and success. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32 ( 10 ): 1209 - 1217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo A, Stähli A, Monje A, Sculean A, Salvi GE. Peri-implantitis: a clinical update on prevalence and surgical treatment outcomes. J Clin Med. 2021; 10 ( 5 ): 1107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrison J, Bligh J. Assessing the quality of research. Med Educ. 2005; 39 ( 6 ): 542 - 544. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02186.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015; 105 ( 3 ): 1809 - 1831.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlkhayyat S, Khan M, Ahmad T, Tariq H, Baig M. A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited papers and research trends in breast cancer related BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Medicine. 2022; 101 ( 38 ): e30576.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSengupta N, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, et al. Analysis of 100 most cited articles on forensic odontology. Saudi Dent J. 2020; 32 ( 7 ): 321 - 329. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.005
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cid13177.pdf
Size:
3.550MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cid13177_am.pdf
Size:
951.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.