Show simple item record

Pre-implementation formative evaluation of cooperative pain education and self-management expanding treatment for real-world access: A pragmatic pain trial

dc.contributor.authorMattocks, Kristin M.
dc.contributor.authorLaChappelle, Kathryn M.
dc.contributor.authorKrein, Sarah L.
dc.contributor.authorDeBar, Lynn L.
dc.contributor.authorMartino, Steve
dc.contributor.authorEdmond, Sara
dc.contributor.authorAnkawi, Brett
dc.contributor.authorMacLean, R. Ross
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Diana M.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Emily
dc.contributor.authorHeapy, Alicia A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T19:12:49Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01 15:12:48en
dc.date.available2023-05-01T19:12:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-04
dc.identifier.citationMattocks, Kristin M.; LaChappelle, Kathryn M.; Krein, Sarah L.; DeBar, Lynn L.; Martino, Steve; Edmond, Sara; Ankawi, Brett; MacLean, R. Ross; Higgins, Diana M.; Murphy, Jennifer L.; Cooper, Emily; Heapy, Alicia A. (2023). "Pre-implementation formative evaluation of cooperative pain education and self-management expanding treatment for real-world access: A pragmatic pain trial." Pain Practice (4): 338-348.
dc.identifier.issn1530-7085
dc.identifier.issn1533-2500
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176318
dc.description.abstractObjectiveCognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (CBT-CP) is an evidence-based treatment for improving functioning and pain intensity for people with chronic pain with extensive evidence of effectiveness. However, there has been relatively little investigation of the factors associated with successful implementation and uptake of CBT-CP, particularly clinician and system level factors. This formative evaluation examined barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation and uptake of CBT-CP from the perspective of CBT-CP clinicians and referring primary care clinicians.MethodsQualitative interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were conducted at nine geographically diverse Veterans Affairs sites as part of a pragmatic clinical trial comparing synchronous, clinician-delivered CBT-CP and remotely delivered, technology-assisted CBT-CP. Analysis was informed by a grounded theory approach.ResultsTwenty-six clinicians (CBT-CP clinicians = 17, primary care clinicians = 9) from nine VA medical centers participated in individual qualitative interviews conducted by telephone from April 2019 to August 2020. Four themes emerged in the qualitative interviews: (1) the complexity and variability of referral pathways across sites, (2) referring clinician’s lack of knowledge about CBT-CP, (3) referring clinician’s difficulty identifying suitable candidates for CBT-CP, and (4) preference for interventions that can be completed from home.ConclusionsThis formative evaluation identified clinician and system barriers to widespread implementation of CBT-CP and allowed for refinement of the subsequent implementation of two forms of CBT-CP in an ongoing pragmatic trial. Identification of relative difference in barriers and facilitators in the two forms of CBT-CP may emerge more clearly in a pragmatic trial that evaluates how treatments perform in real-world settings and may provide important information to guide future system-wide implementation efforts.
dc.publisherThe National Academies Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherveterans
dc.subject.othereducation
dc.subject.otherpain management
dc.subject.otheraccess
dc.titlePre-implementation formative evaluation of cooperative pain education and self-management expanding treatment for real-world access: A pragmatic pain trial
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176318/1/papr13195.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176318/2/papr13195_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/papr.13195
dc.identifier.sourcePain Practice
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberger PH, Kerns R. Implementation of the VA stepped care model of pain management. Ann Beh Med. 2012; 43: S265.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIOM Relieving Pain in America. A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain – United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016; 65 ( 1 ): 1 – 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVA/DoD. Clinical Practice Guideline for Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain (version 3.0); 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams AC d C, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane pain, palliative and supportive care group, ed. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 8 ( 8 ): CD007407. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkelly AC, Chou R, Dettori JR, Turner JA, Friedly JL, Rundell SD, et al. Noninvasive nonpharmacological treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review. Comparative effectiveness review No. 209. AHRQ publication No 18-EHC013-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018. https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCCER209
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart MO, Karlin BE, Murphy JL, Raffa SD, Miller SA, McKellar J, et al. National Dissemination of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain in veterans: therapist- and patient-level outcomes. Clin J Pain. 2015; 31: 722 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy JL, Cordova MJ, Dedert EA. Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain in veterans: evidence for effectiveness in a model program. Psychol Serv. 2020; 19: 95 – 102. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000506
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldsmith E, Koffel E, Ackland P, Hill J, Landsteiner A, Miller W, et al. Implementation of Psychotherapies and Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction for Chronic Pain and Chronic Mental Health Conditions. Washington, DC: Evidence Synthesis Program, Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs. VA ESP Project #09–009; 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBee P, McBeth J, MacFarlane GJ, Lovell K. Managing chronic widespread pain in primary care: a qualitative study of patient perspectives and implications for treatment delivery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17 ( 1 ): 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1194-5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFraser C, Beasley M, Macfarlane G, Lovell K. Telephone cognitive behavioural therapy to prevent the development of chronic widespread pain: a qualitative study of patient perspectives and treatment acceptability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20 ( 1 ): 198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2584-2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccleston C, Fisher E, Craig L, Duggan GB, Rosser BA, Keogh E. Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 2014 ( 2 ): CD010152. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010152.pub2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccleston C, Blyth FM, Dear B, Fisher EA, Keefe FJ, Lynch ME, et al. Managing patients with chronic pain during the COVID-19 outbreak: considerations for the rapid introduction of remotely supported (eHealth) pain management services. Pain. 2020; 161: 889 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeapy AA, Higgins DM, Goulet JL, LaChappelle KM, Driscoll MA, Czlapinski RA, et al. Cooperative pain education and self-management (COPES): a non-inferiority trial of an interactive voice response-based self-management intervention for chronic back pain. JAMA Int Med. 2017; 177 ( 6 ): 765 – 73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0223
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeapy AA, Driscoll MA, Buta E, LaChappelle KM, Edmond S, Krein SL, et al. COPES expanding treatment for real-world access (ExTRA): pragmatic trial protocol. Pain Med. 2020; 21 ( 12 Suppl 2 ): S21 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa365
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDamschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory research: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerns RD, Philip EJ, Lee AW, Rosenberger PH. Implementation of the veterans health administration national pain management strategy. Transl Behav Med. 2011; 1: 635 – 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMattocks K, Rosen MI, Sellinger J, Ngo T, Brummett B, Higgins DM, et al. Pain Care in the Department of veterans affairs: understanding how a cultural shift in pain care impacts provider decisions and collaboration. Pain Med. 2020; 21 ( 5 ): 970 – 7. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz341
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Int Med. 2017; 166: 514 – 30. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2367
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker WC, Dorflinger L, Edmond SN, Islam L, Heapy AA, Fraenkel L. Barriers and facilitators to use of non-pharmacological treatments in chronic pain. BMC Fam Pract. 2017; 18: 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0608-2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiannitrapani KF, Ahluwalia SC, McCaa M, Pisciotta M, Dobscha S, Lorenz KAJPM. Barriers to using nonpharmacologic approaches and reducing opioid use in primary care. Pain Med. 2017; 19: 1357 – 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurgess DJ, Vallone D, Bair MJ, Matthias MS, Taylor BC, Taylor SL. Shifting the National Consciousness about pain treatment: the critical need for a National Public Education Campaign Burgess. J Pain. 2021; 22 ( 10 ): 1129 – 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuhrman M, Gordh T, Andersson G. Internet interventions for chronic pain including headache: a systematic review. Internet Interv. 2016; l4: 17 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Brien KM, Hodder RK, Wiggers J, Williams A, Campbell E, Wolfenden L, et al. Effectiveness of telephone-based interventions for managing osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Peer J. 2018; 6: e5846.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlattery BW, Haugh S, O’Connor L, Francis K, Dwyer Egan J, McGuire BE. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the modalities used to deliver electronic health interventions for chronic pain: systematic review with network meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21: e11086.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.