Show simple item record

Do bedside whiteboards enhance communication in hospitals? An exploratory multimethod study of patient and nurse perspectives

dc.contributor.authorGoyal, Anupama
dc.contributor.authorGlanzman, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Martha
dc.contributor.authorTur, Komalpreet
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sweta
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorSnyder, Ashley
dc.contributor.authorChopra, Vineet
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T21:51:47Z
dc.date.available2023-05-01T21:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-06
dc.identifier.issn2044-5415
dc.identifier.issn2044-5423
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31694874
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176331en
dc.description.abstractObjective To understand patient and nurse views on usability, design, content, barriers and facilitators of hospital whiteboard utilisation in patient rooms. Design Multimethods study. Setting Adult medical-surgical units at a quaternary care academic centre. Participants Four hundred and thirty-eight adult patients admitted to inpatient units participated in bedside surveys. Two focus groups with a total of 13 nurses responsible for updating and maintaining the whiteboards were conducted. Results Most survey respondents were male (55%), ≥51 years of age (69%) and admitted to the hospital ≤4 times in the past 12 months (90%). Over 95% of patients found the whiteboard helpful and 92% read the information on the whiteboard frequently. Patients stated that nurses, not doctors, were the most frequent user of whiteboards (93% vs 9.4%, p<0.001, respectively). Patients indicated that the name of the team members (95%), current date (87%), upcoming tests/procedures (80%) and goals of care (63%) were most useful. While 60% of patients were aware that they could use the whiteboard for questions/comments for providers, those with ≥5 admissions in the past 12 months were significantly more likely to be aware of this aspect (p<0.001). In focus groups, nurses reported they maintained the content on the boards and cited lack of access to clinical information and limited use by doctors as barriers. Nurses suggested creating a curriculum to orient patients to whiteboards on admission, and educational programmes for physicians to increase whiteboard utilisation. Conclusion Bedside whiteboards are highly prevalent in hospitals. Orienting patients and their families to their purpose, encouraging daily use of the medium and nurse-physician engagement around this tool may help facilitate communication and information sharing.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.subjectcommunication
dc.subjectcontinuous quality improvement
dc.subjecthealthcare quality improvement
dc.subjecthospital medicine
dc.subjectpatient-centred care
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectChild, Preschool
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectHospitalization
dc.subjectHospitals
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInformation Dissemination
dc.subjectInpatients
dc.subjectMale
dc.titleDo bedside whiteboards enhance communication in hospitals? An exploratory multimethod study of patient and nurse perspectives
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid31694874
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176331/2/Do bedside whiteboards ...explorator study.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010208
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/7181
dc.identifier.sourceBMJ Qual Saf
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2023-05-01T21:51:45Z
dc.identifier.volumedoi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010208
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.startpage795
dc.identifier.endpage802
dc.identifier.name-orcidGoyal, Anupama
dc.identifier.name-orcidGlanzman, Hanna
dc.identifier.name-orcidQuinn, Martha
dc.identifier.name-orcidTur, Komalpreet
dc.identifier.name-orcidSingh, Sweta
dc.identifier.name-orcidWinter, Suzanne
dc.identifier.name-orcidSnyder, Ashley
dc.identifier.name-orcidChopra, Vineet
dc.working.doi10.7302/7181en
dc.owningcollnameInternal Medicine, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.