Show simple item record

Do Bedside Visual Tools Improve Patient and Caregiver Satisfaction? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

dc.contributor.authorGoyal, Anupama A
dc.contributor.authorMBChB
dc.contributor.authorMPH
dc.contributor.authorTur, Komalpreet
dc.contributor.authorBSc
dc.contributor.authorMann, Jason
dc.contributor.authorMSA
dc.contributor.authorTownsend, Whitney
dc.contributor.authorMLIS
dc.contributor.authorFlanders, Scott A
dc.contributor.authorMD
dc.contributor.authorChopra, Vineet
dc.contributor.authorMD
dc.contributor.authorMSc
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T21:52:11Z
dc.date.available2023-05-01T21:52:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-01
dc.identifier.issn1553-5592
dc.identifier.issn1553-5606
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29091982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176332en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Although common, the impact of low-cost bedside visual tools, such as whiteboards, on patient care is unclear. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature and assess the influence of bedside visual tools on patient satisfaction. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, and CENTRAL. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies of adult or pediatric hospitalized patients reporting physician identification, understanding of provider roles, patient–provider communication, and satisfaction with care from the use of visual tools were included. Outcomes were categorized as positive, negative, or neutral based on survey responses for identification, communication, and satisfaction. Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of study bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Visual tools included whiteboards (n = 4), physician pictures (n = 7), whiteboard and picture (n = 1), electronic medical record-based patient portals (n = 3), and formatted notepads (n = 1). Tools improved patients’ identification of providers (13/13 studies). The impact on understanding the providers’ roles was largely positive (8/10 studies). Visual tools improved patient–provider communication (4/5 studies) and satisfaction (6/8 studies). In adults, satisfaction varied between positive with the use of whiteboards (2/5 studies) and neutral with pictures (1/5 studies). Satisfaction related to pictures in pediatric patients was either positive (1/3 studies) or neutral (1/3 studies). Differences in tool format (individual pictures vs handouts with pictures of all providers) and study design (randomized vs cohort) may explain variable outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of bedside visual tools appears to improve patient recognition of providers and patient–provider communication. Future studies that include better design and outcome assessment are necessary before widespread use can be recommended.
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectAudiovisual Aids
dc.subjectCaregivers
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectElectronic Health Records
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInpatients
dc.subjectPatient Portals
dc.subjectPatient Satisfaction
dc.subjectPatient-Centered Care
dc.subjectProfessional-Patient Relations
dc.titleDo Bedside Visual Tools Improve Patient and Caregiver Satisfaction? A Systematic Review of the Literature.
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid29091982
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176332/2/Goyal 1108e v4.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.12788/jhm.2871
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/7182
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Hospital Medicine
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2023-05-01T21:52:11Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4749-9369
dc.identifier.volume12(11)
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage930
dc.identifier.endpage936
dc.identifier.name-orcidGoyal, Anupama A
dc.identifier.name-orcidMBChB
dc.identifier.name-orcidMPH
dc.identifier.name-orcidTur, Komalpreet
dc.identifier.name-orcidBSc
dc.identifier.name-orcidMann, Jason
dc.identifier.name-orcidMSA
dc.identifier.name-orcidTownsend, Whitney; 0000-0002-4749-9369
dc.identifier.name-orcidMLIS
dc.identifier.name-orcidFlanders, Scott A
dc.identifier.name-orcidMD
dc.identifier.name-orcidChopra, Vineet
dc.identifier.name-orcidMD
dc.identifier.name-orcidMSc
dc.working.doi10.7302/7182en
dc.owningcollnameInternal Medicine, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.