Show simple item record

How Often Are Healthcare Personnel Hands Colonized with Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorSchildhouse, R
dc.contributor.authorAna Montoya, MD
dc.contributor.authorAnupama Goyal, MBChB
dc.contributor.authorJason D Mann, MSA
dc.contributor.authorAshley Snyder, MPH
dc.contributor.authorVineet Chopra, MD
dc.contributor.authorLona Mody, MD
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T22:59:25Z
dc.date.available2023-05-01T22:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.identifier.issn0196-6553
dc.identifier.issn1527-3296
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30527283
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176336en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hands of health care personnel (HCP) can transmit multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), resulting in infections. Our aim was to determine MDRO prevalence on HCP hands in adult acute care and nursing facility settings. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed. Studies were included if they reported microbiologic culture results following HCP hands sampling; included prevalent MDROs, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, Clostridium difficile, Acinetobacter baumannii, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and were conducted in acute care or nursing facility settings. Results: Fifty-nine articles comprising 6,840 hand cultures were included. Pooled prevalence for MRSA, P aeruginosa, A baumannii, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus were 4.26%, 4.59%, 6.18%, and 9.03%, respectively. Substantial heterogeneity in rates of pathogen isolation were observed across studies (I2 = 81%-95%). Only 4 of 59 studies sampled for C difficile, with 2 of 4 finding no growth. Subgroup analysis of MRSA revealed the highest HCP hand contamination rates in North America (8.28%). Sample collection methods used were comparable for MRSA isolation (4%-7%) except for agar direct contact (1.55%). Conclusions: Prevalence of common MDROs on HCP hands vary by pathogen, care setting, culture acquisition method, study design, and geography. When obtained at an institutional level, these prevalence data can be utilized to enhance knowledge, practice, and research to prevent health care–associated infections.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAcute care
dc.subjectHand cultures
dc.subjectHand hygiene
dc.subjectHealth care provider hands
dc.subjectNursing facility
dc.subjectBacteria
dc.subjectBacterial Infections
dc.subjectDrug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
dc.subjectHand
dc.subjectHealth Personnel
dc.subjectHospitals
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNorth America
dc.subjectNursing Homes
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.titleHow Often Are Healthcare Personnel Hands Colonized with Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid30527283
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176336/2/Americal Journal of Infection control. MDRO.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajic.2018.10.017
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/7186
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Infection Control
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2023-05-01T22:59:23Z
dc.identifier.volumeonline
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage693
dc.identifier.endpage703
dc.identifier.name-orcidSchildhouse, R
dc.identifier.name-orcidAna Montoya, MD
dc.identifier.name-orcidAnupama Goyal, MBChB
dc.identifier.name-orcidJason D Mann, MSA
dc.identifier.name-orcidAshley Snyder, MPH
dc.identifier.name-orcidVineet Chopra, MD
dc.identifier.name-orcidLona Mody, MD
dc.working.doi10.7302/7186en
dc.owningcollnameInternal Medicine, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.