View Item 

Show simple item record

Pitfalls of the concordance index for survival outcomes
dc.contributor.authorHartman, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sehee
dc.contributor.authorHe, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorKalbfleisch, John D.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-01T20:48:54Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01 16:48:53en
dc.date.available2023-06-01T20:48:54Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-15
dc.identifier.citationHartman, Nicholas; Kim, Sehee; He, Kevin; Kalbfleisch, John D. (2023). "Pitfalls of the concordance index for survival outcomes." Statistics in Medicine 42(13): 2179-2190.
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176831
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.othersurvival analysis
dc.subject.otherrisk discrimination
dc.subject.otherprognostic modeling
dc.subject.otherconcordance index
dc.titlePitfalls of the concordance index for survival outcomes
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Data
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176831/1/sim9717_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176831/2/sim9717.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.9717
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeagerty P, Zheng Y. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics. 2005; 61: 92 - 105. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030814.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRupinski M, Dunlap W. Approximating Pearson product-moment correlations from Kendall’s tau and Spearman’s rho. Educ Psychol Meas. 1996; 56: 419 - 429. doi: 10.1177/0013164496056003004
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloom H, Field J. Impact of tumor grade and host resistance on survival of women with breast cancer. Cancer. 1971; 28: 1580 - 1589. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197112)28:6<1580::AID-CNCR2820280637>3.0.CO;2-T
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg J, Chia Y, Plevritis S. The effect of age, race, tumor size, tumor grade, and disease stage on invasive ductal breast cancer survival in the U.S. SEER database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;89: 47 - 54. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-1470-1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoyston P, Altman D. External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-33
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTherneau T. A package for survival analysis in R. 2022. R Package Version 3.3-1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchumacher M, Bastert G, Bojar H, et al. Randomized 2x2 trial evaluating hormonal treatment and the duration of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 1994; 12: 2086 - 2093. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2086
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network. Policies and bylaws. Accessed December 12, 2022. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/policies-bylaws/policies/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoppus S, van der Veen F, Opmeer B, Mol B, Bossuyt P. Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 1774 - 1778. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep109
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKe W, Ye Y, Huang S. Discriminant function for prognostic indexes and probability of death in chronic severe hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol. 2003; 38: 861 - 864. doi: 10.1007/s00535-003-1162-3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVickers A, Cronin A, Elkin E, G�nen M. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-53
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimon N, Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for Cox’s proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2011; 39: 1 - 13. doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i05
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Houwelingen H, Bruinsma T, Hart A, Van’t Veer L, Wessels L. Cross-validated Cox regression on microarray gene expression data. Stat Med. 2006; 25: 3201 - 3216. doi: 10.1002/sim.2353
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGuirk A, Driscoll P. The hot air in R 2 $$ {mathrm{R}}^2 $$ and consistent measures of explained variation. Am J Agric Econ. 1995; 77: 319 - 328. doi: 10.2307/1243542
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSapra R. Using R 2 $$ {mathrm{R}}^2 $$ with caution. Curr Med Res Pract. 2014; 4: 130 - 134. doi: 10.1016/j.cmrp.2014.06.002
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCramer J. Mean and variance of R 2 $$ {mathrm{R}}^2 $$ in small and moderate samples. J Econ. 1987; 35: 253 - 266. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(87)90027-3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrell F, Lee K, Mark D. Multivariate prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15: 361 - 387. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrell F, Califf R, Pryor D, Lee K, Rosati R. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982; 247: 2543 - 2546. doi: 10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUno H, Cai T, Pencina M, D’Agostino R, Wei L. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med. 2011; 30: 1105 - 1117. doi: 10.1002/sim.4154
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteyerberg E. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeMaris A, Selman S. Converting Data into Evidence: A Statistics Primer for the Medical Practitioner. New York, NY: Springer; 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJin V, Wang J, Tang B, eds. Integration of Multisource Heterogeneous Omics Information in Cancer. Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers Media SA; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook N. Use and misuse of the receiver operator curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007; 115: 928 - 935. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVickers A. Prediction models: revolutionary in principle, but do they do more good than harm? J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 2951 - 2952. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.1329
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVickers A, Cronin A. Traditional statistical methods for evaluating prediction models are uninformative as to clinical value: towards a decision analytic framework. Semin Oncol. 2010; 37: 31 - 38. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.12.004
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalligan S, Altman D, Mallett S. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 932 - 939. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3487-0
dc.identifier.citedreferencePencina M, D’Agostino R. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med. 2004; 23: 2109 - 2123. doi: 10.1002/sim.1802
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYan G, Greene T. Investigating the effects of ties on measures of concordance. Stat Med. 2008; 27: 4190 - 4206. doi: 10.1002/sim.3257
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG�nen M, Heller G. Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression. Biometrika. 2005; 92: 965 - 970. doi: 10.1093/biomet/92.4.965
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
sim9717_am.pdf
Size:
366.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
sim9717.pdf
Size:
1.467MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.