Show simple item record

Combining local, landscape, and regional geographies to assess plant community vulnerability to invasion impact

dc.contributor.authorIbáñez, Inés
dc.contributor.authorPetri, Laís
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, David T.
dc.contributor.authorBeaury, Evelyn M.
dc.contributor.authorBlumenthal, Dana M.
dc.contributor.authorCorbin, Jeffrey D.
dc.contributor.authorDiez, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorDukes, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorEarly, Regan
dc.contributor.authorPearse, Ian S.
dc.contributor.authorSorte, Cascade J. B.
dc.contributor.authorVilà, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorBradley, Bethany
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-01T20:51:35Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01 16:51:32en
dc.date.available2023-06-01T20:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.identifier.citationIbáñez, Inés ; Petri, Laís ; Barnett, David T.; Beaury, Evelyn M.; Blumenthal, Dana M.; Corbin, Jeffrey D.; Diez, Jeffrey; Dukes, Jeffrey S.; Early, Regan; Pearse, Ian S.; Sorte, Cascade J. B.; Vilà, Montserrat ; Bradley, Bethany (2023). "Combining local, landscape, and regional geographies to assess plant community vulnerability to invasion impact." Ecological Applications 33(4): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761
dc.identifier.issn1939-5582
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176884
dc.description.abstractInvasive species science has focused heavily on the invasive agent. However, management to protect native species also requires a proactive approach focused on resident communities and the features affecting their vulnerability to invasion impacts. Vulnerability is likely the result of factors acting across spatial scales, from local to regional, and it is the combined effects of these factors that will determine the magnitude of vulnerability. Here, we introduce an analytical framework that quantifies the scale-dependent impact of biological invasions on native richness from the shape of the native species–area relationship (SAR). We leveraged newly available, biogeographically extensive vegetation data from the U.S. National Ecological Observatory Network to assess plant community vulnerability to invasion impact as a function of factors acting across scales. We analyzed more than 1000 SARs widely distributed across the USA along environmental gradients and under different levels of non-native plant cover. Decreases in native richness were consistently associated with non-native species cover, but native richness was compromised only at relatively high levels of non-native cover. After accounting for variation in baseline ecosystem diversity, net primary productivity, and human modification, ecoregions that were colder and wetter were most vulnerable to losses of native plant species at the local level, while warmer and wetter areas were most susceptible at the landscape level. We also document how the combined effects of cross-scale factors result in a heterogeneous spatial pattern of vulnerability. This pattern could not be predicted by analyses at any single scale, underscoring the importance of accounting for factors acting across scales. Simultaneously assessing differences in vulnerability between distinct plant communities at local, landscape, and regional scales provided outputs that can be used to inform policy and management aimed at reducing vulnerability to the impact of plant invasions.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherNational Ecological Observatory Network
dc.subject.otherrichness
dc.subject.othervulnerability
dc.subject.otherimpact
dc.subject.otherinvasive
dc.subject.otherhierarchical analysis
dc.titleCombining local, landscape, and regional geographies to assess plant community vulnerability to invasion impact
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176884/1/eap2821-sup-0002-AppendixS2.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176884/2/eap2821-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176884/3/eap2821-sup-0003-AppendixS3.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176884/4/eap2821_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176884/5/eap2821.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eap.2821
dc.identifier.sourceEcological Applications
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). 2020. “Plant Presence and Percent Cover.” DP1.10058.001. https://data.neonscience.org.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLockwood, J. L., P. Cassey, and T. Blackburn. 2005. “The Role of Propagule Pressure in Explaining Species Invasions.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 223–8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLomolino, M. V., B. R. Riddle, and R. J. Whittaker. 2016. Biogeography: Biological Diversity across Space and Time. Sunderland, MA: Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLonsdale, W. M. 1999. “ Global Patterns of Plant Invasions and the Concept of Invasibility.” Ecology 80: 1522 – 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLunch, C. K., C. M. Laney, and NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network). 2020. “neonUtilities: Utilities for Working with NEON Data.” R Package Version 1.3.4. https://github.com/NEONScience/NEON-utilities.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacDougall, A. S., and R. Turkington. 2005. “ Are Invasive Species the Drivers or Passengers of Change in Degrade Ecosystems? ” Ecology 86: 42 – 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. “Biotic Invasions: Causes, Epidemiology, Global Consequences, and Control.” Ecological Applications 10: 689–710.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartinez-Ghersa, M. A., and C. M. Ghersa. 2006. “ The Relationship of Propagule Pressure to Invasion Potential in Plants.” Euphytica 148: 87 – 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGeoch, M. A., P. Genovesi, P. J. Bellingham, M. J. Costello, C. McGrannachan, and A. Sheppard. 2016. “ Prioritizing Species, Pathways, and Sites to Achieve Conservation Targets for Biological Invasion.” Biological Invasions 18: 299 – 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMollot, G., J. H. Pantel, and T. N. Romanuk. 2017. “ Chapter Two - The Effects of Invasive Species on the Decline in Species Richness: A Global Meta-Analysis.” In Advances in Ecological Research, edited by D. A. Bohan, A. J. Dumbrell, and F. Massol, 61 – 83. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaeem, S., K. Håkansson, J. H. Lawton, M. J. Crawley, and L. J.   Thompson. 1996. “ Biodiversity and Plant Productivity in a Model Assemblage of Plant Species.” Oikos 76: 259 – 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearse, I. S., H. R. Sofaer, D. N. Zaya, and G. Spyreas. 2019. “ Non-native Plants Have Greater Impacts because of Differing Per-Capita Effects and Nonlinear Abundance–Impact Curves.” Ecology Letters 22: 1214 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlummer, M. 2021. “rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC.” Package Version 4-12. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rjags.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowell, K. I., J. M. Chase, and T. M. Knight. 2013. “ Invasive Plants Have Scale-Dependent Effects on Diversity by Altering Species-Area Relationships.” Science 339: 316 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQGIS Development Team. 2021. “QGIS Geographic Information System.” Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Core Team. 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRicciardi, A., J. C. Iacarella, D. C. Aldridge, T. M. Blackburn, J. T.   Carlton, J. A. Catford, J. T. A. Dick, et al. 2021. “ Four Priority Areas to Advance Invasion Science in the Face of Rapid Environmental Change.” Environmental Reviews 29: 119 – 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichardson, D. M., and P. Pyšek. 2008. “ Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology – The Legacy of Charles Elton.” Diversity and Distributions 14: 161 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSax, D. F., and S. D. Gaines. 2006. “ The Biogeography of Naturalized Species and the Species-Area Relationship: Reciprocal Insights to Biogeography and Invasion Biology.” In Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology: Reciprocal Approaches to Nature, edited by M. W. Cadotte, S. M. McMahon, and T. Fukami, 449 – 80. Dordrecht: Springer.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheiner, S. M. 2003. “ Six Types of Species-Area Curves.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 441 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchimel, D., M. Keller, S. Berukoff, R. Kao, H. Loescher, H. Powell, T. Kampe, D. Moore, and W. Gram. 2011. “Science Strategy: Enabling Continental-Scale Ecological Forcasting.” http://www.neonscience.org/sites/default/files/basic-page-files/NEON_Strategy_2011u2.pdf.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeabloom, E. W., A. P. Dobson, and D. M. Stoms. 2002. “ Extinction Rates under Nonrandom Patterns of Habitat Loss.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 11229 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShea, K., and P. Chesson. 2002. “Community Ecology Theory as a Framework for Biological Invasions.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 170–6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, J. R., J. N. Hendershot, N. Nova, and G. C. Daily. 2020. “ The Biogeography of Ecoregions: Descriptive Power across Regions and Taxa.” Journal of Biogeography 47: 1413 – 26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSofaer, H. R., C. S. Jarnevich, and I. S. Pearse. 2018. “ The Relationship between Invader Abundance and Impact.” Ecosphere 9: e02415.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSorte, C. J. B., I. Ibáñez, D. M. Blumenthal, N. A. Molinari, L. P.   Miller, E. D. Grosholz, J. M. Diez, et al. 2012. “ Poised to Prosper? A Cross-System Comparison of Climate Change Effects on Native and Non-native Species Performance.” Ecology Letters 16: 261 – 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStohlgren, T. J., D. Binkley, G. W. Chong, M. A. Kalkhan, L. D. Schell, K. A. Bull, Y. Otsuki, G. Newman, M. Bashkin, and Y. Son. 1999. “Exotic Plant Species Invade Hot Spots of Native Plant Diversity.” Ecological Monographs 69 (1): 25–46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTheoharides, K. A., and J. S. Dukes. 2007. “ Plant Invasion across Space and Time: Factors Affecting Nonindigenous Species Success during Four Stages of Invasion.” New Phytologist 176: 256 – 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D., P. B. Reich, J. Knops, D. Wedin, T. Mielke, and C. Lehman. 2001. “ Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment.” Science 294: 843 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2020. The PLANTS Database. Greensboro, NC: National Plant Data Team. http://plants.usda.gov.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVellend, M., L. Baeten, I. H. Myers-Smith, S. C. Elmendorf, R. Beauséjour, C. D. Brown, P. De Frenne, K. Verheyen, and S. Wipf. 2013. “ Global Meta-Analysis Reveals no Net Change in Local-Scale Plant Biodiversity over Time.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 19456 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVilà, M., J. Espinar, M. Hejda, P. Hulme, V. Jarošik, J. Maron, J. Pergl, U. Schaffner, Y. Sun, and P. Pyšek. 2011. “Ecological Impacts of Invasive Alien Plants: A Meta-analysis of their Effects on Species, Communities and Ecosystems.” Ecology Letters 14: 702–8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVila, M., and I. Ibáñez. 2011. “ Plant Invasions in the Landscape.” Landscape Ecology 26: 461 – 72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, P. B., E. W. Seabloom, E. T. Borer, H. Hillebrand, Y. Hautier, A. Hector, W. S. Harpole, et al. 2011. “ Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness.” Science 333: 1750 – 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAikio, S., R. P. Duncan, and P. E. Hulme. 2012. “ The Vulnerability of Habitats to Plant Invasion: Disentangling the Roles of Propagule Pressure, Time and Sampling Effort.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 21: 778 – 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, J. M., and B. A. Bradley. 2016. “ Out of the Weeds? Reduced Plant Invasion Risk with Climate Change in the Continental United States.” Biological Conservation 203: 306 – 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl-Mufti, M. M., C. L. Sydes, S. B. Furness, J. P. Grime, and S. R. Band. 1977. “ A Quantitative Analysis of Shoot Phenology and Dominance in Herbaceous Vegetation.” Journal of Ecology 65: 759 – 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraújo, M. B. 2003. “ The Coincidence of People and Biodiversity in Europe.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 5 – 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArrhenius, O. 1921. “ Species and Area.” Journal of Ecology 9: 95 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett, D. T., P. B. Adler, B. R. Chemel, P. A. Duffy, B. J. Enquist, J. B. Grace, S. Harrison, et al. 2019. “ The Plant Diversity Sampling Design for the National Ecological Observatory Network.” Ecosphere 10: e02603.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett, D. T., P. A. Duffy, D. S. Schimel, R. E. Krauss, K. M. Irvine, F. W. Davis, J. E. Gross, et al. 2019. “ The Terrestrial Organism and Biogeochemistry Spatial Sampling Design for the National Ecological Observatory Network.” Ecosphere 10: e02540.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarney, J. N., and D. R. Tekiela. 2020. “ Framing the Concept of Invasive Species “Impact” within a Management Context.” Invasive Plant Science and Management 13: 37 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarney, J. N., and T. H. Whitlow. 2008. “ A Unifying Framework for Biological Invasions: The State Factor Model.” Biological Invasions 10: 259 – 72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartels, S. F., and H. Y. H. Chen. 2010. “ Is Understory Plant Species Diversity Driven by Resource Quantity or Resource Heterogeneity? ” Ecology 91: 1931 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaury, E. M., J. T. Finn, J. D. Corbin, V. Barr, and B. A. Bradley. 2020. “ Biotic Resistance to Invasion Is Ubiquitous across Ecosystems of the United States.” Ecology Letters 23: 476 – 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaury, E. M., E. J. Fusco, M. R. Jackson, B. B. Laginhas, T. L.   Morelli, J. M. Allen, V. J. Pasquarella, and B. A. Bradley. 2020. “ Incorporating Climate Change into Invasive Species Management: Insights from Managers.” Biological Invasions 22: 233 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradley, B. A., B. B. Laginhas, R. Whitlock, J. M. Allen, A. E. Bates, G. Bernatchez, J. M. Diez, et al. 2019. “ Disentangling the Abundance–Impact Relationship for Invasive Species.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116: 9919 – 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatano, C. P., E. Grman, E. Behrens, and L. A. Brudvig. 2021. “ Species Pool Size Alters Species–Area Relationships during Experimental Community Assembly.” Ecology 102: e03231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChase, J. M., S. A. Blowes, T. M. Knight, K. Gerstner, and F. May. 2020. “ Ecosystem Decay Exacerbates Biodiversity Loss with Habitat Loss.” Nature 584: 238 – 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChase, J. M., K. I. Powell, and T. M. Knight. 2015. “ ‘Bigger Data’ on Scale-Dependent Effects of Invasive Species on Biodiversity Cannot Overcome Confounded Analyses: A Comment on Stohlgren & Rejmánek (2014).” Biology Letters 11: 20150103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrystal-Ornelas, R., and J. L. Lockwood. 2020. “ The ‘Known Unknowns’ of Invasive Species Impact Measurement.” Biological Invasions 22: 1513 – 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. “ Fluctuating Resources in Plant Communities: A General Theory of Invasibility.” Journal of Ecology 88: 528 – 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDidham, R. K., J. M. Tylianakis, N. J. Gemmell, T. A. Rand, and R. M. Ewers. 2007. “ Interactive Effects of Habitat Modification and Species Invasion on Native Species Decline.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 489 – 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDong, L.-J., H.-W. Yu, and W.-M. He. 2015. “ What Determines Positive, Neutral and Negative Impacts of Solidago Canadensis Invasion on Native Plant Species Richness? ” Scientific Reports 5: 16804.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrlich, P. R. 1988. “ The Loss of Diversity: Causes and Conseqyebces.” In Biodiversity, edited by E. O. Wilson and F. M. Peter, 21–7. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFick, S. E., and R. J. Hijmans. 2017. “ WorldClim 2: New 1 km Spatial Resolution Climate Surfaces for Global Land Areas.” International Journal of Climatology 37 ( 12 ): 4302 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrancis, A. P., and D. J. Currie. 2003. “ A Globally Consistent Richness-Climate Relationship for Angiosperms.” The American Naturalist 161: 523 – 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFridley, J. D. 2012. “ Extended Leaf Phenology and the Autumn Niche in Deciduous Forest Invasions.” Nature 485: 359 – 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGonzález-Moreno, P., J. M. Diez, I. Ibáñez, X. Font, and M. Vilà. 2014. “ Plant Invasions Are Context-Dependent: Multiscale Effects of Climate, Human Activity and Habitat.” Diversity and Distributions 20: 720 – 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrace, J. B., T. Michael Anderson, M. D. Smith, E. Seabloom, S. J.   Andelman, G. Meche, E. Weiher, et al. 2007. “ Does Species Diversity Limit Productivity in Natural Grassland Communities? ” Ecology Letters 10: 680 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, S., and B. Wilsey. 2001. “ Empirical Relationships between Species Richness, Evenness, and Proportional Diversity.” The American Naturalist 158: 286 – 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris, I., P. D. Jones, T. J. Osborn, and D. H. Lister. 2014. “ Updated High-Resolution Grids of Monthly Climatic Observations - The CRU TS3.10 Dataset.” International Journal of Climatology 34: 623 – 42. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelsen, K., S. W. Smith, J. Brunet, S. A. O. Cousins, P. De Frenne, A. Kimberley, A. Kolb, et al. 2018. “ Impact of an Invasive Alien Plant on Litter Decomposition along a Latitudinal Gradient.” Ecosphere 9: e02097.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbáñez, I., D. S. W. Katz, D. Peltier, S. M. Wolf, and B. T. Connor Barrie. 2014. “ Assessing the Integrated Effects of Landscape Fragmentation on Plants and Plant Communities: The Challenge Of Multiprocess–Multiresponse Dynamics.” Journal of Ecology 102: 882 – 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbáñez, I., G. Liu, L. Petri, S. Schaffer-Morrison, and S. Schueller. 2021. “ Assessing Vulnerability and Resistance to Plant Invasions: A Native Community Perspective.” Invasive Plant Science and Management 14: 64 – 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbáñez, I. 2022a. “R_JAGS Code for Estimation and Analysis of Species-Area-Relationship (SAR) Parameters from NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network) Data on Plant Surveys.” Dryad. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.z612jm6dx.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbáñez, I. 2022b. “R_JAGS Code for Estimation and Analysis of Species-Area-Relationship (SAR) Parameters from NEON (National Ecological Observatory Network) Data on Plant Surveys.” Zenodo. Code. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6477962.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKartesz, J. T. 2015. The Biota of North America Program (BONAP). Chapel Hill, NC: Taxonomic Data Center. http://www.bonap.net/tdc.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeller, M., D. S. Schimel, W. W. Hargrove, and F. M. Hoffman. 2008. “ A Continental Strategy for the National Ecological Observatory Network.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 282 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKennedy, C. M., J. Oakleaf, D. M. Theobald, S. Baruch-Mordo, and J. Kiesecker. 2018. “Global Human Modification.” Figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7283087.v1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, J. M. 2001. “ Local Interactions, Dispersal, and Native and Exotic Plant Diversity along a California Stream.” Oikos 95: 397 – 408.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.