View Item 

Show simple item record

Comparison of the minimally-invasive roll-in envelope flap technique to the holding suture technique in implant surgery: A prospective case series
dc.contributor.authorShakibaie, Behnam
dc.contributor.authorSabri, Hamoun
dc.contributor.authorBlatz, Marcus B.
dc.contributor.authorBarootchi, Shayan
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-01T20:51:40Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01 16:51:38en
dc.date.available2023-06-01T20:51:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.identifier.citationShakibaie, Behnam; Sabri, Hamoun; Blatz, Marcus B.; Barootchi, Shayan (2023). "Comparison of the minimally-invasive roll-in envelope flap technique to the holding suture technique in implant surgery: A prospective case series." Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 35(4): 625-631.
dc.identifier.issn1496-4155
dc.identifier.issn1708-8240
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/176886
dc.description.abstractObjeciveThe peri-implant soft tissue phenotype plays a role in the long-term success of dental implants, thus, creating the need for the application of different techniques for the management of its adjacent soft tissues. The aim of this case series was to describe and evaluate the clinical outcomes of the microsurgical roll-in-envelope flap (RIE) approach, in comparison with a more commonly used method for manipulation of the peri-implant soft tissues, namely the holding-suture flap (HS) technique.Materials and Methods10 posterior dental implants in 10 healthy individuals were selected and randomly assigned treatment by each of the mentioned groups relative to the flap design. Mucosal thickness was measured at the time of the surgery and at 6 and 12 weeks, serving as the main outcome.ResultsThe healing was uneventful at all sites without any patient drop-outs. The comparison of two groups revealed a three-fold reduction in the mucosal thickness in HS group compared to RIE.ConclusionsIn presence of sufficient periimplant supporting tissues and when indicated, the RIE flap seems to yield superior outcomes reducing pain/discomfort compared to connective tissue grafts.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.othertissue graft
dc.subject.othermicroscope
dc.subject.otherimplant microsurgery
dc.subject.othersoft tissue augmentation
dc.subject.otherdental implant
dc.titleComparison of the minimally-invasive roll-in envelope flap technique to the holding suture technique in implant surgery: A prospective case series
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176886/1/jerd13027_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/176886/2/jerd13027.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jerd.13027
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 631 - 637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2021; 92: 21 - 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCairo F, Barbato L, Tonelli P, Batalocco G, Pagavino G, Nieri M. Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44: 769 - 776.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVallecillo C, Toledano-Osorio M, Vallecillo-Rivas M, Toledano M, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Osorio R. Collagen matrix vs. autogenous connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13 ( 11 ): 1810.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Di Gianfilippo R, et al. Patient experience of autogenous soft tissue grafting has an implication for future treatment: a 10- to 15-year cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2021; 92: 637 - 647.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGobbato L, Nart J, Bressan E, Mazzocco F, Paniz G, Lops D. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcomes after the application of a subepithelial connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally advanced flap or via a tunneling technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 2191 - 2202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShakibaie-M B. Uses of the operating microscope in minimally invasive implantology. Quintessenz. 2010; 61: 293 - 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiannobile WV, Jung RE, Schwarz F. Groups of the 2nd osteology foundation consensus M. evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: osteology foundation consensus report part 1-effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 ( Suppl 15 ): 7 - 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 ( Suppl 15 ): 32 - 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang II, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33: 212 - 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhorshed A, Vilarrasa J, Monje A, Nart J, Blasi G. Digital evaluation of facial peri-implant mucosal thickness and its impact on dental implant aesthetics. Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 27: 581 - 590.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hammerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28: 357 - 365.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27: 251 - 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, et al. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2020; 91: 9 - 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams L. Augmentation of the deformed residual edentulous ridge for fixed prosthesis. Compend Contin Educ Gen Dent. 1980; 1: 205 - 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScharf DR, Tarnow DP. Modified roll technique for localized alveolar ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992; 12: 415 - 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemcovsky CE, Artzi Z. Split palatal flap. I. A surgical approach for primary soft tissue healing in ridge augmentation procedures: technique and clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999; 19: 175 - 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePandolfi A. A modified approach to horizontal augmention of soft tissue around the implant: omega roll envelope flap. Description of surgical technique. La Clin Ter. 2018; 169: e165 - e169.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark SH, Wang HL. Pouch roll technique for implant soft tissue augmentation: a variation of the modified roll technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32: e116 - e121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Gasser TJW, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF. Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing implant sites augmented with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft: 3-year data after insertion of reconstructions. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47: 630 - 639.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArtzi Z, Renert U, Netanely E, Thoma DS, Vered M. Histologic composition of marginal mucosal tissue augmented by a resorbable volume-stable collagen matrix in soft tissue thickening procedures in humans: a morphometric observational study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26: 427 - 435.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShakibaie-M B. Microscope-guided external sinus floor elevation (MGES)–a new minimally invasive surgical technique. IMPLANTOLOGIE. 2008; 16: 21 - 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZuhr O, Fickl S, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Hurzeler M. Covering of gingival recessions with a modified microsurgical tunnel technique: case report. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2007; 27: 457 - 463.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurkhardt R, Lang NP. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro-and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 287 - 293.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosseini M, Worsaae N, Gotfredsen K. Tissue changes at implant sites in the anterior maxilla with and without connective tissue grafting: a five-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31: 18 - 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo M, Grasso G, Dalmasso P. Keratinized mucosa around implants in partially edentulous posterior mandible: 10-year results of a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 491 - 496.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Wang HL, Ravida A, et al. Ridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group C. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019; 12: 399 - 416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonca AF, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 407 - 412.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 212 - 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014; 93: 950 - 958.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarakat K, Ali A, Abdel Meguid A, Abdel MM. Modified roll flap a handy technique to augment the peri-implant soft tissue in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Tanta Dent J. 2013; 10: 123 - 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabri H, Sarkarat F, Mortezagholi B, Aghajani D. Non-surgical management of oro-antral communication using platelet-rich fibrin: a review of the literature. Oral Surg. 2022; 15 ( 3 ): 455 - 464.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Wang HL. Implant soft tissue dehiscence coverage esthetic score (IDES): a pilot within- and between-rater analysis of consistency in objective and subjective scores. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32: 349 - 358.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanini M, Marzadori M, Sangiorgi M, Rendon A, Testori T, Zucchelli G. Complications and treatment errors in peri-implant soft tissue management. Periodontol 2000. 2023: 1 - 15. doi: 10.1111/prd.12470
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Tavelli L, Di Gianfilippo R, et al. Soft tissue phenotype modification predicts gingival margin long-term (10-year) stability: longitudinal analysis of six randomized clinical trials. J Clin Periodontol. 2022; 49: 672 - 683.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Gil A, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. Management and prevention of soft tissue complications in implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000. 2000; 2022 ( 88 ): 116 - 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, et al. Classification of facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. J Periodontol. 2019; 90: 1116 - 1124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTabanella G. The buccal pedicle flap technique for periimplant soft tissue boosting. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019; 14: 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2000; 2017 ( 73 ): 7 - 21.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jerd13027_am.pdf
Size:
767.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jerd13027.pdf
Size:
1.190MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.