Disability, program access, empathy and burnout in US medical students: A national study
Meeks, Lisa M.; Pereira-Lima, Karina; Plegue, Melissa; Jain, Neera R.; Stergiopoulos, Erene; Stauffer, Catherine; Sheets, Zoie; Swenor, Bonnelin K.; Taylor, Nichole; Addams, Amy N.; Moreland, Christopher J.
2023-06
Citation
Meeks, Lisa M.; Pereira-Lima, Karina ; Plegue, Melissa; Jain, Neera R.; Stergiopoulos, Erene; Stauffer, Catherine; Sheets, Zoie; Swenor, Bonnelin K.; Taylor, Nichole; Addams, Amy N.; Moreland, Christopher J. (2023). "Disability, program access, empathy and burnout in US medical students: A national study." Medical Education 57(6): 523-534.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate whether self-disclosed disability and self-reported program access are associated with measures of empathy and burnout in a national sample of US medical students.MethodsThe authors obtained data from students who responded to the Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) Year 2 Questionnaire (Y2Q) in 2019 and 2020. Data included demographic characteristics, personal variables, learning environment indicators, measures of burnout (Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for Medical Students), empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and disability-related questions, including self-reported disability, disability category and program access. Associations between disability status, program access, empathy and burnout were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models accounting for YQ2 demographic, personal-related and learning environment measures.ResultsOverall, 23 898 (54.2%) provided disability data and were included. Of those, 2438 (10.2%) self-reported a disability. Most medical students with disabilities (SWD) self-reported having program access through accommodations (1215 [49.8%]) or that accommodations were not required for access (824 [33.8%]). Multivariable models identified that compared with students without disabilities, SWD with and without program access presented higher odds of high exhaustion (1.50 [95% CI, 1.34–1.69] and 2.59 [95% CI, 1.93–3.49], respectively) and lower odds of low empathy (0.75 [95% CI, 0.67–.85] and 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52–0.90], respectively). In contrast, multivariable models for disengagement identified that SWD reporting lack of program access presented higher odds of high disengagement compared to students without disabilities (1.43 [95% CI, 1.09–1.87], whereas SWD with program access did not (1.09 [95% CI, 0.97–1.22]).ConclusionsDespite higher odds of high exhaustion, SWD were less likely to present low empathy regardless of program access, and SWD with program access did not differ from students without disabilities in terms of disengagement. These findings add to our understanding of the characteristics and experiences of SWD including their contributions as empathic future physicians.Meeks et al. demonstrate that program access is essential for the wellbeing of students with disabilities while showing that they may be more empathic physicians. #DocsWithDisabilitiesPublisher
Assocation of American Medical Colleges Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
0308-0110 1365-2923
Other DOIs
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.