Show simple item record

Common Barriers to Replicability and Retrieval in Systematic Review Search Strategies

dc.contributor.authorTownsend, Whitney A
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Patricia G
dc.contributor.authorGinier, Emily C
dc.contributor.authorMacEachern, Mark P
dc.contributor.authorSaylor, Kate M
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Judith E
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T19:28:47Z
dc.date.available2023-06-27T19:28:47Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/177127en
dc.description.abstractObjective: To identify the most common elements of systematic review search strategies that affect the replicability of the search and the comprehensiveness of the retrieval. Methods: Participants from three cohorts of a systematic review-focused workshop were asked to draft a replicable search strategy based on a brief scenario and a research question from a published systematic review. Participants were provided with three studies that were included in the published systematic review, but not the original systematic review. The researchers in the scenario asked for three commonly-requested limits: date range, inclusion of specific outcome, and publication type. Participants were free to choose to apply these limits or none. Submitted strategies were evaluated by two blinded reviewers for replicability, use of search limits, retrieval of the three provided studies, and retrieval of all studies included in the published systematic review. This study received exemption status from the Institutional Review Board.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectSystematic Reviewen_US
dc.subjectExpert Searchingen_US
dc.titleCommon Barriers to Replicability and Retrieval in Systematic Review Search Strategiesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumLibrary, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/177127/1/MLA2018_CapstoneAnalysis_Paper.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/177127/2/MLA2018_CapstoneAnalysis_Paper.pptx
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/7861
dc.identifier.source2018 Medical Library Association Annual Conferenceen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4749-9369en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of MLA2018_CapstoneAnalysis_Paper.pdf : Conference paper in pdf format
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of MLA2018_CapstoneAnalysis_Paper.pptx : Conference paper in ppt format
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidTownsend, Whitney; 0000-0002-4749-9369en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/7861en_US
dc.owningcollnameLibrary (University of Michigan Library)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.