View Item 

Show simple item record

Interproximal implant thread exposure after initial bone remodeling as a risk indicator for peri-implantitis
dc.contributor.authorRavidà, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSamal, Ankita
dc.contributor.authorQazi, Musa
dc.contributor.authorWebber, Liana Preto
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.contributor.authorGalindo-Moreno, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorBorgnakke, Wenche S.
dc.contributor.authorSaleh, Muhammad H. A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T13:57:11Z
dc.date.available2024-07-14 09:57:10en
dc.date.available2023-07-14T13:57:11Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.identifier.citationRavidà, Andrea ; Samal, Ankita; Qazi, Musa; Webber, Liana Preto; Wang, Hom-Lay ; Galindo-Moreno, Pablo ; Borgnakke, Wenche S.; Saleh, Muhammad H. A. (2023). "Interproximal implant thread exposure after initial bone remodeling as a risk indicator for peri- implantitis." Journal of Periodontology 94(6): 751-764.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/177267
dc.description.abstractBackgroundDue to the clinical challenges involved in successfully treating peri-implantitis, it is imperative to identify patient- and implant-level risk factors for its prevention. The main goal of this retrospective longitudinal radiographic and clinical study was to investigate whether interproximal radiographic implant thread exposure after physiological bone remodeling may be a risk factor for peri-implantitis. The secondary goal was to evaluate several other potential risk indicators.MethodsOf 4325 active dental school patients having implants placed, 165 partially edentulous adults (77 men, 88 women) aged 30–91 with ≥2 years of follow-up upon implant restoration were included. Implants with ≥1 interproximal thread exposed (no bone-to-implant contact) (n = 98, 35%) constituted the test group and those without exposed threads (n = 182, 65%) the control group. Descriptive, binary, and multivariate regression analyses were evaluated for goodness of fit. Wald tests were used to evaluate for significance set at 0.05.ResultsOf the 280 implants (98 test, 182 control), 8 (2.9%) failed over a mean follow-up period of 7.67 (±2.63) years, and 27 implants (19 test, 8 control) developed peri-implantitis, with the exposed group having eight-fold (7.82 times) adjusted greater odds than the non-exposed. The risk increased four-fold (3.77 times) with each thread exposed. No other patient- or implant-related potentially confounding risk factors were identified.ConclusionsExposed interproximal implant threads after physiologic bone remodeling may be an independent risk indicator for incident peri-implantitis. Hence, clinicians should closely monitor patients with implant threads that have no bone-to-implant contact for incident peri-implantitis.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbone resorption
dc.subject.otherperiodontics
dc.subject.otherradiography
dc.subject.othertooth loss
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.titleInterproximal implant thread exposure after initial bone remodeling as a risk indicator for peri-implantitis
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/177267/1/jper11049.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/177267/2/jper11049_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.22-0499
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310: 2191 - 2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 7 - 21. doi: 10.1111/prd.12185
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 129 - 136. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTirone F, Salzano S, Rodi D, Pozzatti L. Three-year evaluation of the influence of implant surfaces on implant failure and peri-implantitis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial with split-mouth design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021; 36: e23 - e30. 10.11607/jomi.8538
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerks J, Schaller D, Håkansson J, Wennström JL, Tomasi C, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: prevalence of peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2016; 95: 43 - 49. doi: 10.1177/0022034515608832
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRakasevic D, Lazic Z, Soldatovic I, Scepanovic M, Gabric D. Influence of titanium implant macrodesign on peri-implantitis occurrence: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26: 5237 - 5246. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04492-z
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomanos G, Damouras M, Veis AA, Hess P, Schwarz F, Brandt S. Comparison of histomorphometry and microradiography of different implant designs to assess primary implant stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22: 373 - 379. doi: 10.1111/cid.12915
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKligman S, Ren Z, Chung CH, et al. The impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration and biofilm formation. J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 1641. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081641
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAljateeli M, Wang HL. Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration. Implant Dent. 2013; 22: 127 - 132. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318278a90b
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStavropoulos A, Bertl K, Winning L, Polyzois I. What is the influence of implant surface characteristics and/or implant material on the incidence and progression of peri-implantitis? a systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32 (Suppl 21 ): 203 - 229. doi: 10.1111/clr.13859
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDo JH. Peri-Implantitis and concomitant perigraftitis of an implant placed in a site that had alveolar ridge preservation three decades earlier: a case report with human histology. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2022; 12: 44 - 50. doi: 10.1002/cap.10181
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung RE, Herzog M, Wolleb K, Ramel CF, Thoma DS, Hämmerle CH. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 348 - 354. doi: 10.1111/clr.12806
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding doctors in clinical research; adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964. https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/DoH-Jun1964.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects; adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 and as revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975. https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/DoH-Oct1975.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018; 89: S159 - S172. doi: 10.1002/jper.18-0006
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1– review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 536 - 543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoornewaard R, Christiaens V, De Bruyn H, et al. Long-term effect of surface roughness and patients’ factors on crestal bone loss at dental implants; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19 ( 2 ): 372 - 399. doi: 10.1111/cid.12457
dc.identifier.citedreferencePimentel SP, Shiota R, Cirano FR, et al. Occurrence of peri-implant diseases and risk indicators at the patient and implant levels: a multilevel cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2018; 89: 1091 - 1100. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0599
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Reasons for failures of oral implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41: 443 - 476. doi: 10.1111/joor.12157
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Aranda L, Diaz KT, et al. Impact of maintenance therapy for the prevention of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016; 95: 372 - 379. doi: 10.1177/0022034515622432
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Souza Batista VE, Verri FR, Lemos CAA, et al. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121: 41 - 51. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.004
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRavidà A, Tattan M, Askar H, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Comparison of three different types of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a long-term retrospective study of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30: 295 - 305. doi: 10.1111/clr.13415
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDreyer H, Grischke J, Tiede C, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of peri-implantitis: a systematic review. J Periodontal Res. 2018; 53: 657 - 681. doi: 10.1111/jre.12562
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunpinar S, Meraci B, Karas M. Analysis of risk indicators for prevalence of peri-implant diseases in Turkish population. Int J Implant Dent. 2020; 6: 19. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00215-9
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapi P, Di Murro B, Pranno N, et al. Prevalence of peri-implant diseases among an Italian population of patients with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2019; 90: 1374 - 1382. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0077
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDa Silva JD, Kazimiroff J, Papas A, et al. Outcomes of implants and restorations placed in general dental practices: a retrospective study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145: 704 - 713. 10.14219/jada.2014.27
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaleh MH, Galli M, Siqueira R, Vera M, Wang HL, Ravidà A. The prosthetic-biologic connection and its influence on peri-implant health: an overview of the current evidence. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022; 37: 690 - 699. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9523
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 (Suppl 1 ): S267 - S290. doi: 10.1002/jper.16-0350
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of Workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 (Suppl 1 ): S313 - S318. doi: 10.1002/jper.17-0739
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Kan JY, Borgnakke WS. Impact of local predisposing/precipitating factors and systemic drivers on peri-implant diseases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023. doi: 10.1111/cid.13155. In press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRokaya D, Srimaneepong V, Wisitrasameewon W, Humagain M, Thunyakitpisal P. Peri-implantitis update: risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur J Dent. 2020; 14: 672 - 682. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715779
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease: a systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42: S158 - S171. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12334
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiaz P, Gonzalo E, Villagra LJG, Miegimolle B, Suarez MJ. What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22: 449. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02493-8
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRakic M, Galindo-Moreno P, Monje A, et al. How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22: 1805 - 1816. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2276-y
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Hirooka H, Polyzois I, Kelekis-Cholakis A, Wang HL, Working Group 3. Diagnosis and non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases and maintenance care of patients with dental implants – consensus report of Working group 3. Int Dent J. 2019; 69 (Suppl 2 ): 12 - 17. doi: 10.1111/idj.12490
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 (Suppl 1 ): S304 - S312. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0588
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Dahlin C, Reinedahl D, Tengvall P, Trindade R, Wennerberg A. An imbalance of the immune system instead of a disease behind marginal bone loss around oral implants: position paper. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35: 495 - 502. 10.11607/jomi.8218
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoos-Jansåker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. part III: factors associated with peri-implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33: 296 - 301. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00908.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33: 929 - 935. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01001.x
dc.identifier.citedreferencePontoriero R, Tonelli MP, Carnevale G, Mombelli A, Nyman SR, Lang NP. Experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis. a clinical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994; 5: 254 - 259. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050409.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRavidà A, Siqueira R, Di Gianfilippo R, et al. Prognostic factors associated with implant loss, disease progression or favorable outcomes after peri-implantitis surgical therapy. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022; 24: 222 - 232. doi: 10.1111/cid.13074
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRavidà A, Rodriguez MV, Saleh MHA, et al. The correlation between history of periodontitis according to staging and grading and the prevalence/severity of peri-implantitis in patients enrolled in maintenance therapy. J Periodontol. 2021; 92: 1522 - 1535. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0012
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrisch E, Vach K, Ratka-Krueger P. Impact of supportive implant therapy on peri-implant diseases: a retrospective 7-year study. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47: 101 - 109. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13206
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosta FO, Takenaka-Martinez S, Cota LO, Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Costa JE. Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 173 - 181. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01819.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo M, Layton DM, Roccuzzo A, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Clinical outcomes of peri-implantitis treatment and supportive care: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 (Suppl 16 ): 331 - 350. doi: 10.1111/clr.13287
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXue T, Attarilar S, Liu S, et al. Surface modification techniques of titanium and its alloys to functionally optimize their biomedical properties: thematic review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 603072. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.603072
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger MB, Slosar P, Schwartz Z, et al. A review of biomimetic topographies and their role in promoting bone formation and osseointegration: implications for clinical use. Biomimetics (Basel). 2022; 7. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7020046
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanz-Martin I, Paeng K, Park H, Cha JK, Jung UW, Sanz M. Significance of implant design on the efficacy of different peri-implantitis decontamination protocols. Clin Oral Investig. 2021; 25: 3589 - 3597. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03681-y
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBosshardt DD, Chappuis V, Buser D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 22 - 40. doi: 10.1111/prd.12179
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper11049.pdf
Size:
1005.KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper11049_am.pdf
Size:
1.818MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.