Show simple item record

Predictors of relationship satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic

dc.contributor.authorAscigil, Esra
dc.contributor.authorLuerssen, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Richard
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Amie M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T20:29:57Z
dc.date.available2024-12-04 15:29:55en
dc.date.available2023-12-04T20:29:57Z
dc.date.issued2023-11
dc.identifier.citationAscigil, Esra; Luerssen, Anna; Gonzalez, Richard; Gordon, Amie M. (2023). "Predictors of relationship satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic." Social and Personality Psychology Compass 17(11): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn1751-9004
dc.identifier.issn1751-9004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/191666
dc.description.abstractPrior work and theory suggest many vulnerabilities, stressors, and adaptive processes shape relationship satisfaction. In the current research, we used machine learning to understand which constructs have greater predictive importance for perceived changes in satisfaction since the pandemic began and satisfaction over the prior week. In a large sample collected at the beginning of the pandemic (N = 1873; Study 1), relationship processes were most predictive, explaining up to 70% of variance in satisfaction. Feeling appreciative of one’s partner and being satisfied with quality time spent with one’s partner were consistently top predictors of satisfaction. We also examined whether these important predictors were associated with changes in relationship satisfaction across the first year of the pandemic in a longitudinal subsample (N = 618; Study 2). Appreciation and satisfaction with quality time were associated with high and relatively stable relationship satisfaction over time.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherGuilford Publications
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19
dc.subject.otherrelationship satisfaction
dc.subject.othermachine-learning
dc.titlePredictors of relationship satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/191666/1/spc312881.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/191666/2/spc312881_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/spc3.12881
dc.identifier.sourceSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. ( 1995 ). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118 ( 1 ), 3 – 34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoel, S., Eastwick, P. W., Allison, C. J., Arriaga, X. B., Baker, Z. G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Bergeron, S., Birnbaum, G. E., Brock, R. L., Brumbaugh, C. C., Carmichael, C. L., Chen, S., Clarke, J., Cobb, R. J., Coolsen, M. K., Davis, J., de Jong, D. C., Debrot, A., DeHaas, E. C., …, & Wolf, S. ( 2020 ). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 ( 32 ), 19061 – 19071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917036117
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon, A. M., Cross, E., Ascigil, E., Balzarini, R., Luerssen, A., & Muise, A. ( 2022 ). Feeling appreciated buffers against the negative effects of unequal division of household labor on relationship satisfaction. Psychological Science, 33 ( 8 ), 1313 – 1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221081872
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEder, S. J., Nicholson, A. A., Stefanczyk, M. M., Pieniak, M., Martínez-Molina, J., Pešout, O., Binter, J., Smela, P., Scharnowski, F., & Steyrl, D. ( 2021 ). Securing your relationship: Quality of intimate relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic can be predicted by attachment style. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 647956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647956
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaddell, N., Overall, N. C., Chang, V. T., & Hammond, M. D. ( 2021 ). Gendered division of labor during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown: Implications for relationship problems and satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38 ( 6 ), 1759 – 1781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996476
dc.identifier.citedreferencePietromonaco, P. R., & Overall, N. C. ( 2021 ). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships. American Psychologist, 76 ( 3 ), 438 – 450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiehuis, S., Davis, K., Reifman, A., Callaway, K., Luempert, A., Rebecca Oldham, C., Head, J., & Willis-Grossmann, E. ( 2022 ). Psychometric evaluation of single-item relationship satisfaction, love, conflict, and commitment measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221133693
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. ( 2006 ). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Publications.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.