Show simple item record

Decision-Making for Extremely Preterm Infants: A Qualitative Systematic Review

dc.contributor.authorKrick, JA
dc.contributor.authorFeltman, DM
dc.contributor.authorArnolds, M
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T17:12:34Z
dc.date.available2023-12-11T17:12:34Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-01
dc.identifier.issn0022-3476
dc.identifier.issn1097-6833
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35940293
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/191699en
dc.description.abstractObjective: To synthesize and describe important elements of decision-making during antenatal consultation for threatened preterm delivery at the margin of gestational viability. Study design: Data sources including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus were searched. We included all qualitative literature published on decision-making from 1990 to July 2021. Two authors independently screened and evaluated each study using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist; studies reaching moderate and high quality were included. We developed an extraction tool to collect and categorize data from each qualitative article, then used thematic analysis to analyze and describe the findings. Results: Twenty-five articles incorporating the views of 504 providers and 352 parents were included for final review. Thematic analysis revealed 4 main themes describing the experience of health care providers and parents participating in decision-making: factors that influence decision-making, information sharing, building a partnership, and making the decision. Parents and providers were not always in agreement upon which elements were most essential to the process of decision-making. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded. Conclusions: Qualitative literature highlighting key factors which are important during antenatal counseling can inform and guide providers through the process of shared decision-making. Communicating clear, honest, and balanced information; avoiding artificially dichotomized options; and focusing on partnership building with families will help providers use the antenatal consultation to reach personalized decisions for each infant.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectInfant, Newborn
dc.subjectInfant
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectInfant, Extremely Premature
dc.subjectDecision Making
dc.subjectParents
dc.subjectHealth Personnel
dc.subjectInformation Dissemination
dc.subjectQualitative Research
dc.titleDecision-Making for Extremely Preterm Infants: A Qualitative Systematic Review
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid35940293
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/191699/2/Decision making for extremely preterm infants systematic review.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.07.017
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/21879
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Pediatrics
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2023-12-11T17:12:33Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8055-1723
dc.identifier.volume251
dc.identifier.startpage6
dc.identifier.endpage16
dc.identifier.name-orcidKrick, JA
dc.identifier.name-orcidFeltman, DM
dc.identifier.name-orcidArnolds, M; 0000-0001-8055-1723
dc.working.doi10.7302/21879en
dc.owningcollnamePediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.