Show simple item record

Design Control for Clinical Translation of 3D Printed Modular Scaffolds

dc.contributor.authorHollister, SJ
dc.contributor.authorFlanagan, CL
dc.contributor.authorZopf, DA
dc.contributor.authorMorrison, RJ
dc.contributor.authorNasser, H
dc.contributor.authorPatel, JJ
dc.contributor.authorEbramzadeh, E
dc.contributor.authorSangiorgio, SN
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, MB
dc.contributor.authorGreen, GE
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T17:06:57Z
dc.date.available2024-01-09T17:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-01
dc.identifier.issn0090-6964
dc.identifier.issn1573-9686
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25666115
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/191961en
dc.description.abstractThe primary thrust of tissue engineering is the clinical translation of scaffolds and/or biologics to reconstruct tissue defects. Despite this thrust, clinical translation of tissue engineering therapies from academic research has been minimal in the 27 year history of tissue engineering. Academic research by its nature focuses on, and rewards, initial discovery of new phenomena and technologies in the basic research model, with a view towards generality. Translation, however, by its nature must be directed at specific clinical targets, also denoted as indications, with associated regulatory requirements. These regulatory requirements, especially design control, require that the clinical indication be precisely defined a priori, unlike most academic basic tissue engineering research where the research target is typically open-ended, and furthermore requires that the tissue engineering therapy be constructed according to design inputs that ensure it treats or mitigates the clinical indication. Finally, regulatory approval dictates that the constructed system be verified, i.e., proven that it meets the design inputs, and validated, i.e., that by meeting the design inputs the therapy will address the clinical indication. Satisfying design control requires (1) a system of integrated technologies (scaffolds, materials, biologics), ideally based on a fundamental platform, as compared to focus on a single technology, (2) testing of design hypotheses to validate system performance as opposed to mechanistic hypotheses of natural phenomena, and (3) sequential testing using in vitro, in vivo, large preclinical and eventually clinical tests against competing therapies, as compared to single experiments to test new technologies or test mechanistic hypotheses. Our goal in this paper is to illustrate how design control may be implemented in academic translation of scaffold based tissue engineering therapies. Specifically, we propose to (1) demonstrate a modular platform approach founded on 3D printing for developing tissue engineering therapies and (2) illustrate the design control process for modular implementation of two scaffold based tissue engineering therapies: airway reconstruction and bone tissue engineering based spine fusion.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.subjectBronchi
dc.subjectCervical Vertebrae
dc.subjectComputer-Aided Design
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPrinting, Three-Dimensional
dc.subjectSplints
dc.subjectTissue Engineering
dc.subjectTissue Scaffolds
dc.subjectTrachea
dc.titleDesign Control for Clinical Translation of 3D Printed Modular Scaffolds
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid25666115
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/191961/2/2015_Ann Biomed Eng_DesignControlof3DPrintedModularScaffolds.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10439-015-1270-2
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/21962
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of Biomedical Engineering
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-01-09T17:06:54Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8300-141X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2313-8542
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5156-9542
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 2015_Ann Biomed Eng_DesignControlof3DPrintedModularScaffolds.pdf : Published version
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage774
dc.identifier.endpage786
dc.identifier.name-orcidHollister, SJ
dc.identifier.name-orcidFlanagan, CL
dc.identifier.name-orcidZopf, DA; 0000-0001-8300-141X
dc.identifier.name-orcidMorrison, RJ; 0000-0002-2313-8542
dc.identifier.name-orcidNasser, H
dc.identifier.name-orcidPatel, JJ
dc.identifier.name-orcidEbramzadeh, E
dc.identifier.name-orcidSangiorgio, SN
dc.identifier.name-orcidWheeler, MB
dc.identifier.name-orcidGreen, GE; 0000-0002-5156-9542
dc.working.doi10.7302/21962en
dc.owningcollnameBiomedical Engineering, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.