Show simple item record

Imaging response assessment for predicting outcomes after bioselection chemotherapy in larynx cancer: A secondary analysis of two prospective trials

dc.contributor.authorGharzai, LA
dc.contributor.authorPakela, J
dc.contributor.authorJaworski, EM
dc.contributor.authorEl Naqa, I
dc.contributor.authorShah, J
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, PG
dc.contributor.authorSpector, ME
dc.contributor.authorBradford, CR
dc.contributor.authorChinn, SB
dc.contributor.authorMalloy, K
dc.contributor.authorKupfer, R
dc.contributor.authorShuman, A
dc.contributor.authorMorrison, R
dc.contributor.authorStucken, CL
dc.contributor.authorRosko, A
dc.contributor.authorPrince, ME
dc.contributor.authorCasper, K
dc.contributor.authorEisbruch, A
dc.contributor.authorWolf, G
dc.contributor.authorSwiecicki, PL
dc.contributor.authorWorden, F
dc.contributor.authorMierzwa, ML
dc.coverage.spatialIreland
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T17:20:41Z
dc.date.available2024-01-09T17:20:41Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-01
dc.identifier.issn2405-6308
dc.identifier.issn2405-6308
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024462
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/191971en
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: Bioselection with induction chemotherapy in larynx cancer is associated with excellent larynx preservation and disease-specific survival but requires visual inspection of the primary tumor. We retrospectively compare clinical and imaging response in bioselected patients to develop predictive models of surgeon-assessed response (SR), laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS) in bioselected patients. Materials and methods: In a secondary analysis of patients on two single-institution bioselection trials, model building used a regularized regression model (elastic-net) and applied nested cross-validation. Logistic regression-based model was used to predict SR and Cox proportional hazard-based models were used to predict LFS and OS. Results: In 115 patients with a median age of 57 years, most patients had supraglottic tumors (73.0%) and T3/T4 disease (94.8%). Definitive treatment was chemoradiation in 76.5% and laryngectomy in 23.5%. Change in primary tumor (OR = 5.78, p < 0.001) and N-classification (OR = 1.64, p = 0.003) predicted SR (AUC 0.847). Change in tumor volume (HR = 0.58, p < 0.001) predicted LFS (c-index 0.724). N-classification (HR = 1.48, p = 0.04) and pre-chemotherapy tumor volume (HR = 1.30, p = 0.174) predicted OS (c-index 0.552). Conclusions: Imaging offers a non-invasive opportunity to evaluate response to induction chemotherapy, complementary to surgeon assessment. Further evaluation of approaches to bioselection that optimize generalizability of this paradigm are needed, and clinical trials utilizing imaging to predict outcomes including LFS are warranted.
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsLicence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectBioselection imaging
dc.subjectChemoradiation
dc.subjectLaryngectomy
dc.subjectLocally advanced laryngeal cancer
dc.titleImaging response assessment for predicting outcomes after bioselection chemotherapy in larynx cancer: A secondary analysis of two prospective trials
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/191971/2/Imaging response assessment for predicting outcomes after bioselection chemotherapy in larynx cancer A secondary analysis of.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ctro.2021.12.006
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/21972
dc.identifier.sourceClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-01-09T17:20:36Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3439-4899
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6023-1132
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3847-8865
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7646-6075
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4282-0640
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0337-9293
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0000-0757-8348
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9305-7860
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2313-8542
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1448-3376
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6432-5451
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1120-9008
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2878-3863
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6632-4951
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3923-9970
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Imaging response assessment for predicting outcomes after bioselection chemotherapy in larynx cancer A secondary analysis of.pdf : Published version
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.startpage30
dc.identifier.endpage36
dc.identifier.name-orcidGharzai, LA
dc.identifier.name-orcidPakela, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidJaworski, EM; 0000-0003-3439-4899
dc.identifier.name-orcidEl Naqa, I; 0000-0001-6023-1132
dc.identifier.name-orcidShah, J; 0000-0002-3847-8865
dc.identifier.name-orcidHawkins, PG
dc.identifier.name-orcidSpector, ME; 0000-0001-7646-6075
dc.identifier.name-orcidBradford, CR
dc.identifier.name-orcidChinn, SB; 0000-0003-4282-0640
dc.identifier.name-orcidMalloy, K; 0000-0002-0337-9293
dc.identifier.name-orcidKupfer, R; 0009-0000-0757-8348
dc.identifier.name-orcidShuman, A; 0000-0002-9305-7860
dc.identifier.name-orcidMorrison, R; 0000-0002-2313-8542
dc.identifier.name-orcidStucken, CL; 0000-0003-1448-3376
dc.identifier.name-orcidRosko, A; 0000-0001-6432-5451
dc.identifier.name-orcidPrince, ME; 0000-0002-1120-9008
dc.identifier.name-orcidCasper, K; 0000-0003-2878-3863
dc.identifier.name-orcidEisbruch, A
dc.identifier.name-orcidWolf, G
dc.identifier.name-orcidSwiecicki, PL
dc.identifier.name-orcidWorden, F; 0000-0002-6632-4951
dc.identifier.name-orcidMierzwa, ML; 0000-0002-3923-9970
dc.working.doi10.7302/21972en
dc.owningcollnameRadiation Oncology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.