Show simple item record

White Matter Hyperintensity-Adjusted Critical Infarct Thresholds to Predict a Favorable 90-Day Outcome

dc.contributor.authorPatti, J
dc.contributor.authorHelenius, J
dc.contributor.authorPuri, AS
dc.contributor.authorHenninger, N
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-02T03:35:33Z
dc.date.available2024-03-02T03:35:33Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-01
dc.identifier.issn0039-2499
dc.identifier.issn1524-4628
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/192524en
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose - There is increasing interest in defining stroke lesion volume thresholds to predict poststroke outcome. However, there is a paucity of data on factors that impact the association between critical infarct thresholds volume and outcome. We sought to determine whether lesion thresholds best predicting outcome depend on the degree of preexisting white matter hyperintensity (WMH) lesion burden. Methods - Magnetic resonance imaging infarct volumes were quantified in 414 consecutive patients with anterior circulation ischemic strokes evaluated between January 2014 and December 2014. The WMH lesion volume was graded according to the Fazekas scale and dichotomized to absent to mild versus moderate to severe. Receiver operator characteristics curves were calculated to determine the infarct volume threshold best predicting the 90-day outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether the critical lesion thresholds independently predicted a favorable 90-day outcome after adjusting for pertinent confounders. Results - The infarct volumes thresholds predicting the 90-day outcome for the entire cohort (standard thresholds) were ≤29.5 mL (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-1), ≤29.9 mL (mRS 0-2), and ≤34.1 mL (mRS 0-3). For patients with absent-to-mild WMH lesion burden, WMH-adjusted critical infarct thresholds were significantly greater than the standard infarct thresholds. In the fully adjusted multivariable regression models, the WMH-adjusted infarct thresholds correctly predicted the outcome to a similar degree as the standard thresholds. Conclusions - In this proof-of-concept study, the WMH lesion burden impacted the critical outcome-predicting infarct thresholds. If confirmed, using a WMH-adjusted infarct threshold could allow defining patients that have a favorable outcome despite having relatively large infarct volumes.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.subjectbrain injury
dc.subjectcerebral small vessel diseases
dc.subjectinfarction
dc.subjectischemic stroke
dc.subjectleukoaraiosis
dc.subjectoutcome
dc.subjectwhite matter hyperintensities
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectBrain
dc.subjectBrain Ischemia
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectWhite Matter
dc.titleWhite Matter Hyperintensity-Adjusted Critical Infarct Thresholds to Predict a Favorable 90-Day Outcome
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.pmid27633020
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/192524/2/White Matter Hyperintensity-Adjusted Critical Infarct Thresholds to Predict a Favorable 90-Day Outcome.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013982
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22428
dc.identifier.sourceStroke
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2024-03-02T03:35:26Z
dc.identifier.volume47
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.startpage2526
dc.identifier.endpage2533
dc.identifier.name-orcidPatti, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidHelenius, J
dc.identifier.name-orcidPuri, AS
dc.identifier.name-orcidHenninger, N
dc.working.doi10.7302/22428en
dc.owningcollnameNeurology, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.