Show simple item record

A hydrological prediction system based on the SVS land-surface scheme: efficient calibration of GEM-Hydro for streamflow simulation over the Lake Ontario basin

dc.contributor.authorGaborit, Étienne
dc.contributor.authorFortin, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorXu, Xiaoyong
dc.contributor.authorSeglenieks, Frank
dc.contributor.authorTolson, Bryan
dc.contributor.authorFry, Lauren M
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Tim
dc.contributor.authorAnctil, François
dc.contributor.authorGronewold, Andrew D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-18T18:25:38Z
dc.date.available2024-03-18T18:25:38Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-28
dc.identifier.citationGaborit, E., V. Fortin, X. Xu, F. Seglenieks, B. Tolson, L.M. Fry, T. Hunter, F. Anctil, A.D. Gronewold, 2017. A hydrological prediction system based on the SVS land-surface scheme: effective calibration of GEM-Hydro for streamflow simulation over the Lake Ontario basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 21(9), 4825-4839.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/192645en
dc.description.abstractThis work explores the potential of the distributed GEM-Hydro runoff modeling platform, developed at Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) over the last decade. More precisely, the aim is to develop a robust implementation methodology to perform reliable streamflow simulations with a distributed model over large and partly ungauged basins, in an efficient manner. The latest version of GEM-Hydro combines the SVS (Soil, Vegetation and Snow) land-surface scheme and the WATROUTE routing scheme. SVS has never been evaluated from a hydrological point of view, which is done here for all major rivers flowing into Lake Ontario. Two established hydrological models are confronted to GEM-Hydro, namely MESH and WATFLOOD, which share the same routing scheme (WATROUTE) but rely on different land-surface schemes. All models are calibrated using the same meteorological forcings, objective function, calibration algorithm, and basin delineation. GEM-Hydro is shown to be competitive with MESH and WATFLOOD: the NSE  √  (Nash–Sutcliffe criterion computed on the square root of the flows) is for example equal to 0.83 for MESH and GEM-Hydro in validation on the Moira River basin, and to 0.68 for WATFLOOD. A computationally efficient strategy is proposed to calibrate SVS: a simple unit hydrograph is used for routing instead of WATROUTE. Global and local calibration strategies are compared in order to estimate runoff for ungauged portions of the Lake Ontario basin. Overall, streamflow predictions obtained using a global calibration strategy, in which a single parameter set is identified for the whole basin of Lake Ontario, show accuracy comparable to the predictions based on local calibration: the average NSE  √  in validation and over seven subbasins is 0.73 and 0.61, respectively for local and global calibrations. Hence, global calibration provides spatially consistent parameter values, robust performance at gauged locations, and reduces the complexity and computation burden of the calibration procedure. This work contributes to the Great Lakes Runoff Inter-comparison Project for Lake Ontario (GRIP-O), which aims at improving Lake Ontario basin runoff simulations by comparing different models using the same input forcings. The main outcome of this study consists in a new generalizable methodology for implementing a distributed hydrologic model with a high computation cost in an efficient and reliable manner, over a large area with ungauged portions, using global calibration and a unit hydrograph to replace the routing component.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Unionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 21: Issue 9en_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectHydrologic Cycleen_US
dc.subjectHydrologic Modelingen_US
dc.subjectModel Comparisonen_US
dc.subjectGreat Lakesen_US
dc.subjectRoutingen_US
dc.subjectStatisticsen_US
dc.titleA hydrological prediction system based on the SVS land-surface scheme: efficient calibration of GEM-Hydro for streamflow simulation over the Lake Ontario basinen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEnvironment and Sustainability, School foren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, LS&Aen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLead Investigator (US), Global Center for Climate Change Impacts on Transboundary Watersen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/192645/2/hess-21-4825-2017.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4825-2017
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22461
dc.identifier.sourceHydrology and Earth System Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3576-2529en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of hess-21-4825-2017.pdf : Main article in PDF form
dc.identifier.name-orcidGronewold, Andrew; 0000-0002-3576-2529en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/22461en_US
dc.owningcollnameEnvironment and Sustainability, School for (SEAS/SNRE)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.